BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Exclusive: Former House Clerk's Testimony
October 19, 2006 3:11 PM
The former clerk of the House of Representatives, Jeff Trandahl, who testified for more than four hours before the House Ethics Committee today, is believed to have testified that a top aide to House Speaker Dennis Hastert was informed of "all issues dealing with the page program," according to a Republican familiar with the investigation.
The Republican source said Trandahl planned to name Ted Van Der Meid, the speaker's counsel and floor manager, as the person who was briefed on a regular basis about any issue that arose in the page program, including a "problem group of members and staff who spent too much time socializing with pages outside of official duties." One of whom was Mark Foley.
Trandahl's testimony before the House Ethics Committee could provide additional evidence that key members of the speaker's staff were aware of problems involving the page program for years.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Van Der Meid declined to comment to ABC News, but a source close to Van Der Meid says he expects to be called to testify before the House Ethics Committee next week and plans to answer all questions.
Last week, Foley's former chief of staff, Kirk Fordham, testified before the Ethics Committee about his public allegations that the speaker's chief of staff, Scott Palmer, was told about problems with Foley at least three years ago.
Palmer has said that Fordham's version of events "never happened."
Trandahl was known as a strict and protective overseer of the page program. He was mentioned in one instant message exchange obtained by ABC News that occurred between a former page and Foley in early 2003, when the teen was planning a trip to Washington to visit with other former pages.
Teen: i think everyone is going to be pretty wasted a lot of the time in dc too
Maf54: haha
Maf54: probably
Teen: well we dont have the a-- hole clerk to fire us anymore
Maf54: true
Teen: we didnt like trandahl that much…he isnt a nice guy…and he gets really scarey when he is mad
Maf54: does he
Teen: ya just a bit...oh well
Trandahl left his job as clerk of the House last year to become executive director of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
Read the Blotter's Full Coverage of the Foley Internet Scandal.
October 19, 2006 in Mark Foley Internet Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (67)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
You have to wonder what was going through Hastert's mind all this time. He and his staff acted irresponsibly with all the information they were given - what was their motive? Political, of course! Now that they've been caught in lie after lie, there is no reason to suspect they won't continue to cover up with lies. It's time for some real action against the fat man.
Posted by: Phil Stemple | Oct 19, 2006 3:38:48 PM
Hastert's professional associates are proving he is a liar. At what point does he concede or does he get to stick to his lies, no matter what?
Does the man have to be FORCED to admit this? And he was elected on public trust? He is a MODEL of INTEGRITY?
Are they all like that? Most certainly--if this one has the President backing him up in the face of testimony from many.
Posted by: blondmadison | Oct 19, 2006 3:50:31 PM
lOOKS LIKE THE PAINT IS PEELING OFF THE COVER UP, TOO BAD, THESE GUYS SMELL AND LET'S JUST HOPE MOST OF THEM ARE GONE SOON! They should put all women in charge of the page program, period. Granysue
Posted by: Sue Filutze | Oct 19, 2006 4:25:56 PM
Another Republican cover-up. Nixon is beginning to look better. This is worse than the "second rate buglary" of Watergate. This are the same people who impeached Clinton for a sexual affair with an adult woman who seduced him.
Posted by: Jim in Sao Paulo | Oct 19, 2006 4:39:32 PM
Again, all the Republican leadership needed to do was turn this over to the ethics committee. They had more than enough information to do so. The ethics committee, obviously would have found enough evidence to censure Foley if it just started asking questions, but it didn't because Hastert and company decided to bury it.
The opposite of burying it would have been to follow procedure and hand the matter over to the ethics committee, but they decided to not do that. In the end, this all comes down to this simple fact. They could have done the right thing but chose to hush the matter up.
Posted by: Bob | Oct 19, 2006 4:44:37 PM
Who cares???Isn't that his personal life anyway??? The kids probably taught him a few tricks!!! Get real!!!!
Posted by: Diane Welch | Oct 19, 2006 4:45:46 PM
Hastert has to feel like an idiot about now. His lies are being uncovered. It's evident that he was informed about the page incident long before 2005.
Posted by: N.Wilson | Oct 19, 2006 4:48:39 PM
It ain't over 'till the fat gentleman sings.
Posted by: Bill from Dover | Oct 19, 2006 4:53:58 PM
I vacillate between sadness and rage about this scandal, given that it's the party who stridently touts family values and religious beliefs. And neither they nor many of their followers see the glaring hypocrisy that's self-evident. They should be ashamed of applying their judgmental attitudes towards others while avoiding responsibility for their own reckless and immoral behavior.
Posted by: Thomas Fransen | Oct 19, 2006 4:56:51 PM
My guess is that the repubs are going to plant a fake leak claiming democrats have been messing with pages during this time frame as well. It would be typical of them to make a last minute election claim that could not be proven just before the election. The repubs have been guilty of jamming phones, sending out fake literature saying the election day was a day later, etc., etc., etc. So it will be interesting with their horribly low approval that they will do something drastic. They brought us Nixon and McCarthy after all!!!
Posted by: Mike | Oct 19, 2006 5:02:31 PM
It's a vast left-wing conspiracy!
Posted by: DR | Oct 19, 2006 5:05:18 PM
Well, it is significant that GOP leadership did not act responsibly in the matter of former Rep. Foley and the young pages, it is astonishing that our focus is once more on how public figures behave sexually, and not address their other moral transgressions.
Posted by: Zoe | Oct 19, 2006 5:07:12 PM
Hastert is going down, probably the whole gop.
Posted by: rdf | Oct 19, 2006 5:07:32 PM
"CHARACTER COUNTS"
Remember???
Guess it only applies to married Deomocrat men who receive consensual BJs from overweight, twenty-something, wealthy, children-of-privilige who willingly offer them up.
Posted by: PatrickDC202 | Oct 19, 2006 5:11:14 PM
It's easy to figure out the why's here. Foley's district is around 55% Republican, and he got like 65% of the vote.
If it was the reverse, where the district was 65% Republican, yet he was getting only 55% of the vote, he would have been sent packing a long time ago.
They would have figured any decent Republican would win easily.
Since losing the incumbent R in that district could have switched it to a D, they decided to cover it all up.
Posted by: johnnydrama | Oct 19, 2006 5:17:01 PM
What was going through Hastert's mind?
Orders from DeLay-the de facto leader:
Keep a lid on problems, Denny, and we all keep our jobs.
Posted by: CLK | Oct 19, 2006 5:19:01 PM
The Congress of the United States is the most expensive brothel in the world. Almost anyone will sell any value to maintain (a) office with its ridiculous perks, and (b) access to the corporate interests that control them--in other words, their pimps.
I'm sure there are decent people there, but offhand I can't name more than three.
But disheartened and cynical as I am, I will vote and try to choose lesser evils. To this oldtimer voting is not a privilege but an obligation. And the only way to flush out the sewage in the system.
Posted by: Mike Adkins | Oct 19, 2006 5:19:24 PM
Wow, at this rate, we'll know the full breadth of the scandal by, say, late November...
Posted by: BobSF_94117 | Oct 19, 2006 5:23:23 PM
No wonder this guy left Capitol Hill to work elsewhere--if we all saw what he saw, we'd have wised up much sooner to the lies and hypocrisy among the so-called moral majority.
Posted by: L. E. N. | Oct 19, 2006 5:33:47 PM
Yea, GrannySue -- someone like Mary Kay LaTourneau. Cuz we know that women never do anything to kids.
Posted by: Becks07 | Oct 19, 2006 5:39:33 PM
Post a comment
