BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
ALERT: A New Message From Osama Bin Laden Is on the Way
Legal Powerhouse Olson Will Take W.Va. Court Case to SCOTUS
Panel OKs "Boot Camp" Bill
Oil Giants to Appear Before Congress
Bush Signs CNMI Immigration Bill into Law
Embattled Official Defends Pricey Hand Towels
Shock and Awe on M Street
WEWS Cleveland: Natural Gas Boom Has Hidden Danger
Lobbyists Making Even More Money Than Ever
Thanks to You, the Blotter Marks Second Year With More Success
White House Ousts Top Official Accused of Political Favoritism
Second Trial for Boeing Whistleblower
Undercover Investigation: One-Stop Shopping for Steroids
Report: U.S. Anti-Corruption Efforts Looking Good (in Iraq)
CIA Tape Probes, Still Chugging Along
Ex-KBR Workers to Testify on Contract Fraud
McCain Aided Arizona Businessman
Duke Briber Hasn't Made Bail, Judge Says
Rezko out on Bail
Despite Admission, Latest Hill Scandal "Still a Whodunit"
Radical Ties an Issue as Dems Debate
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
House Speaker Testifies on Foley Scandal
October 24, 2006 2:35 PM
What did the speaker know, and when did he know it? House Speaker Dennis Hastert gives his own answer to that question today, as he testifies before the House Ethics Committee on the Mark Foley scandal.
Hastert went behind closed doors with the committee at 1:30 p.m., following two other key figures in the investigation.
Rep. Tom Reynolds (R-NY) spent nearly three hours before the committee earlier today. He wouldn't comment on the specifics of his testimony, saying "the committee asked me not to."
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
But earlier this month, Reynolds said he personally told Speaker Hastert last spring about concerns over Foley's "overly friendly" e-mails to former pages.
"When I found out about this whole instance for the first time in the spring of '06, I reported it to my supervisor, like anyone would in an office circumstance," Reynolds said three weeks ago. "I took it to the speaker of the House."
Speaker Hastert has said he has no memory of such a warning.
Reynolds' former chief of staff, Kirk Fordham, who previously worked for Mark Foley, said he also brought their concerns to the attention of Hastert's staff.
Hastert's Chief of Staff Scott Palmer has denied Fordham's account. Palmer wrapped up more than six hours of testimony last night, and his attorney said that while he couldn't discuss the substance, it was "consistent with the position he has taken all along."
Read the Blotter's Full Coverage of the Foley Internet Scandal.
October 24, 2006 in Mark Foley Internet Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (10)
So if we donate or contribute any fund or money to the church or politician and they goin any troble and spend that for legel fees we cannot say ourself sexoffenders. But if any muslims give money to mosque for good reasons and end up in terrorist hand. We can say the donor is terrrorist. Where are we?
Posted by: Dipti | Oct 24, 2006 4:13:00 PM
I pray that Hastert gets sent to prison for what he did to our government. If his only punishment is to take a high-paying job as a lobbyist, it will send a message to the others that the US government welcomes corrumption.
Posted by: Sanders Kaufman | Oct 24, 2006 4:28:08 PM
Wake up America!! This man is 3rd in line to become president of the United States of America should something happen to the current president & vice-president like for instance that suddenly they must be held accountable for their crimes against the United States and its citizens and the FBI must arrest the current sitting president & vice-president for these crimes while still in office; not to mention this man is arguably the 4rth most powerful person in America right now and the CEO of the Congress; so if he did not know about what was transpiring he is incompetent and should be fired, and worse if he knew about it and did nothing to protect these kids then he is negligent and incompetent and should be fired, and worst of all if he knew about it and did nothing to protect these kids and is now lying to the United States of America and its citizens for whom he works to "cover up" his incompetence, negligence, and now criminal acts then he should be fired and prosecuted. If the United States of America and its citizens desreve and expect excellence, truth, and justice especially from those granted such positions of power in our democratic form of government then how can we, the United States of America and its citizens, trust this man who could become president to protect us when he can't even protect the children in the page program at the institution where he is the CEO from the adult male predators. My fellow Americans, Republican and Democrats, this man is a clear and present danger to our National Security; he must be removed from office for incompetence, negligence, and now what apears to be a criminal cover-up. If this man can't even protect the people in the congress how could he possible protect us?????
Posted by: Todd Restelli | Oct 24, 2006 6:07:43 PM
I just want to thank the conservative camp for putting these crooks and pediphiles in our government. It seems no one know what the other is doing, I do not believe this is the way government is suppose to work. But hey what do I know I am just a simple working depending on people like our speaker to protect us. How much more do we have to take before this country wakes up to reality?
Posted by: john | Oct 24, 2006 6:58:20 PM
Mr. Hastert, it is so unbelievable that a man of your stature, your position and the length of service would publicly say "I didn't know about it." You are a man whose "job description" is one that says "you must know about everything that is going on." Do you still want us to believe you knew nothing about this? Can you look intelligent America in the face and say "trust me - I am innocent." Are you going to be like the executives of Enron and hide this and let other people suffer. Mr. Hastert how do you spell integrity? Does your dictionary spell it "deny"?
Posted by: Sharon | Oct 24, 2006 7:34:24 PM
Ya know, it's joe republican who should be furious with the republican party. What a slap in the face to themselves. Their own party played them like a fiddle. We tried to tell 'em. Oh well,
Posted by: stevex47 | Oct 24, 2006 10:18:11 PM
From Bush, Cheney, and Hassert on this is the most overtly greedy and power hungry Administration I have seen in my lifetime. Nixon's coverup and corruption pales in comparison to this bunch. Either Clinton or Carter get blamed for whatever goes wrong. No one will accept blame for their lies and incompetence. The smartest move Bill Frist made is not running for reelection. May God help our wonderful country, as well as the rest of the world if this group is not removed from power!
Posted by: Jo Whiz | Oct 24, 2006 10:27:05 PM
i think that it is so sad that this once great country is being run by liars and by people who just run this country for their own gains anyone convicted for fraud or lying should lose their benifits just like us poor working class would to keep racking up their original earnings and benifits which they accumalated while profiting themselves is ridiclous.when is america going to wake up and stop this.i ask you could the normal working person pay 30,000 a month for some so called addiction just because he was found out and still collect a hefty pension.i ask you what is wrong with this picture i don,t care if you are a republican,democrat,or liberal.something should be done
Posted by: sweetie | Oct 25, 2006 8:07:22 PM
What a sleezy bunch of leaders representing us. Just when I thought we had "bottomed out" with Richard Nixson and Spiro Agnew, along comes King George and his thugs, Cheny, Dumbsfeld, Rove, Rice and Hastert to prove that maybe Nixon and Agnew were not so bad after all. Now I wonder why they wanted this Congress to grant them imunity, imunity from what? War crimes? Lying? Complete disregard for the US Constitution?
Posted by: Charlie Ellenburg | Oct 26, 2006 8:26:24 AM
Mr.Hastert is not kidding anyone with his lies. Matter of fact, it seems America is starting to pay attention and realizing all these crooks in office are lying about something or another. Its time America takes back our country and kicks these crooks out of office. Dem or Rep, all government officals, including the president, should be held accountable and investigated just like anyone else who commits crimes!
Posted by: DJ | Oct 26, 2006 2:08:24 PM
Post a comment
