BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Turmoil in Hastert's Office as Key Staff Testifies
October 23, 2006 1:37 PM
Top aides to Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) are expected to testify this week in the House Ethics Committee investigation of the Foley page scandal.
Hastert may also appear, according to Chicago Sun-Times political reporter Lynn Sweet. Today Chief of Staff Scott Palmer entered the room to testify before the committee around 2p.m.
The investigation of how the Republican leadership handled the issue has provoked turmoil and finger-pointing in Hastert's office, congressional sources say.
Some of Hastert's principal aides have hired criminal defense lawyers to represent them during the investigation. Ted Van Der Meid, Hastert's chief in-house counsel, has retained Washington, D.C.-based attorney Lee Blalack, who also represents convicted former Congressman Duke Cunningham.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
A key focus of the congressional investigation is the timing of when Hastert and his top staff first learned of Foley's problem behavior toward congressional pages.
The results of an internal review conducted by the speaker's office, released on Sept. 30, said Hastert's staff only learned of complaints about Foley in the fall of 2005 after a congressional page complained about inappropriate e-mails.
But former House Clerk Jeff Trandahl as well as Kirk Fordham, Foley's former chief of staff, have both told associates, and are believed to have testified before the House Ethics Committee, that top staff in Speaker Hastert's office were informed several years ago about Foley's inappropriate behavior toward congressional pages.
Read the Blotter's Full Coverage on the Foley Internet Scandal.
October 23, 2006 in Mark Foley Internet Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (40)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Um, if no one did anything wrong as Hastert has said, then why are they all hiring defense lawyers?
Posted by: me | Oct 23, 2006 2:40:47 PM
Does it matter. Hastert knew and did nothing. Wouldn't it have worked it's way up his priority list in a year? Why would it take longer? Lies take longer to cover-up than the truth!
Posted by: AbbieX | Oct 23, 2006 2:45:17 PM
Hastert "may also appear" ?! Hastert's in the center of this! The buck stops with him! And it's not even certain he'll testify? Looks like Hastert's hand-picked investigative team is doing the job he asked them to do.
Posted by: pakaal | Oct 23, 2006 2:45:28 PM
Brian--
It is worth reporting to and reminding your audience that the political "culture" in Washington involves lots of gossip, locker-room banter, wining and dining, private trips and outings where discussions of backstairs doings are hashed over. Therefore it lacks credibility that Rep. Hastert and others were unaware of Foley's folly --or of the follies of other colleagues on both sides of the aisle.
Posted by: Doug Giebel | Oct 23, 2006 3:05:48 PM
On November 7, people in Illinois need to vote Hastert out and JOHN LAESCH (D) in.
Posted by: Lori | Oct 23, 2006 3:05:55 PM
He knew. PERIOD What has happened to our country. What a shame and a mess.
Posted by: kelly | Oct 23, 2006 3:11:41 PM
Ethics Committee and its investigative products have zero credibility. We must have an outside investigation: Somebody appoint an independent prosecutor NOW!
Posted by: CLAUDE FOUTCH | Oct 23, 2006 3:21:33 PM
Hastert should have been the first person to testify. He's the one in charge. What's up?
Posted by: Sue H | Oct 23, 2006 3:24:48 PM
It's like watching a pancake that's stuck to the kitchen ceiling. I know it's going to fall, I just don't know exactly when - although I'm surprised it stuck there as long as it did.
Put a plate under Hastert.
Posted by: Ted | Oct 23, 2006 3:26:31 PM
I wonder if Denni will make the right wing radio rounds again blaming George Soros, Bill Clinton, and Dick Morris (laughter) for his downfall and the "timing" of the Foley Scandal.
These Repubs have no shame. Bush had the nerve to tell the American People this weekend that he's "never been stay the course" on Iraq.
How can anyone believe a single word that comes out of their mouths?
Posted by: PoliShifter | Oct 23, 2006 3:26:50 PM
It looks like Hastert in a race at home now. He had a 35 point lead he now is only 7 points up. People in his District are tired of land deals, $1000.00 day fishing trips and the cover up for Foley. Republicans are taken down his signs and replacing them with the Navy Vets John Laesch signs does not look good for him.
Posted by: Dale Peters | Oct 23, 2006 3:32:03 PM
Dear "me",
Anytime there are possible leagal issues that involve charges being laid it would be wise to retain personal counsel. Guilty or not correct or not one must protect oneself against the judicial machine; just because one has been adjudicated and "justice" has been served does not imply fair treatment. One is responsible for one's own representation. That said, these people make me sick. What a load of hypocritical child-endangering basturds(sic)!
Posted by: Ron in LA | Oct 23, 2006 3:41:29 PM
WHAT I CAN STAND ABOUT THID ENTIRE MESS IS HOW SOME ARE TURNING THIS INTO A DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN ISSUE. THIS ISSUE IS OUR CHILDREN WERE NOT SAFE AND SOMEONE TRIED TO COVER IT UP.... THATS EVEN MORE SICK THAN WHAT FOLEY DID.
Posted by: DELOU | Oct 23, 2006 3:48:50 PM
Republican Rep. Sue Kelly (R-NY) was on the page board during the time Mark Foley was soliciting underage House Pages for sex. Rep. Kelly's response? Proclaiming her opponnent John Hall is "shameful in his behavior" to mention that she showed no responsibility in the scandal. Sue claims she has protected children all her life as a mother, teacher, and grandmother. She said she doesn't see why Denny Hastert should resign. Sue said she has put in bills in congress to protect children against those people who would abuse them. Sue, why don't those bills apply to you? Sue, your behavior is shameful and dangerous to children in your care.
Posted by: rugby | Oct 23, 2006 3:58:59 PM
I wouldnt be suprised if there was a whole ring of pedophiles in capitol hill. Ironic that neo con politicians and Catholic priest are immersed in this type of behaviour.
Posted by: Aaron | Oct 23, 2006 4:06:14 PM
Previous entry- Ethics Committee and its investigative products have zero credibility. We must have an outside investigation: Somebody appoint an independent prosecutor NOW!
Answer:
They are coming real soon. In a matter of weeks, actually. A lot of folks right down to and maybe including Dubya will be going off to jail without passing go and collecting $200. Then maybe we can beg the world's forgivness and get back to being the great country America was before Dumbya Inc. Stole the country.
Posted by: George Ernst | Oct 23, 2006 4:12:33 PM
It's good to see there is SOME law & order left in this nation, but let's get some heavy-sentences if they're convicted. And hey, why is Bob Ney still in-office? He keeps saying he's resigning--then, nada. Here's why: the Bush administration must be telling him he cannot, that they need him for-a-time. They need the majority to keep them out-of-jail, because the GOP-majority has been obstructing justice for six-years now.
Posted by: Matt Janovic | Oct 23, 2006 4:13:38 PM
Hastert and others obviously have lied. However, the top dog seems to be getting away with much more costly lies. Lying to justify invading a sovereign country, should be reason enough for a good Congress to put hard questions to Dubya.
Posted by: stevex47 | Oct 23, 2006 4:20:12 PM
Remember, me....
Only guilty people hire lawyers (that's how you can tell who's guilty in court).
Posted by: smoker | Oct 23, 2006 4:37:00 PM
Dennis Hasert should go ahead and admit his part and get it over witn
Posted by: dan alejandro | Oct 23, 2006 4:48:54 PM
Post a comment
