BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Who Knew What When? Timelines of Key Players Don't Match Each Other on Foley
October 25, 2006 12:07 PM
The House Ethics Committee will have to sort through contradictory testimony about what House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) knew about the Mark Foley scandal and when he knew it.
Speaker Hastert gave his account behind closed doors yesterday and said he hopes the committee will "continue to move forward to get to the bottom of this."
But over the past two weeks, the committee has heard from a number of witnesses whose public statements do not match up.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Here is an overview of the key players in the investigation and the accounts they have given about what they knew, when they knew it, and who they told:
House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.): Hastert issued a statement saying neither he nor anyone in the Republican leadership knew about Foley's "vile and repulsive" sexually explicit instant messages to a former page until ABC News made them public on Sept. 29 and Foley resigned.
Hastert says he has no memory of being told about a separate "overly friendly" e-mail exchange between Foley and another former page in the fall of 2005, but his office issued a statement indicating senior staffers were informed of it at that time.
Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.): In what appears to be the earliest known incident involving Foley, Kolbe says his office heard from one of his former pages about inappropriate instant messages from Foley as early as 2000. Kolbe's office tells ABC News the complaint was passed along to Foley's office and the then Clerk of the House Jeff Trandahl and that they believed "the issue was resolved."
Kirk Fordham (then Rep. Foley's chief of staff): Fordham says, as far back as 2002 or 2003, he alerted "senior staff at the highest level of the House of Representatives" about his concern over Foley's "inappropriate behavior." Sources tell ABC News that Fordham did so after hearing that Foley paid an after-hours visit to the page dorm. Fordham says Speaker Hastert's Chief of Staff Scott Palmer then met with Hastert.
Scott Palmer (Speaker Hastert's Chief of Staff): Palmer issued a statement saying Fordham's version of events "did not happen."
Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.): Rep. Alexander contacted Hastert's office in the fall of 2005, after one of Alexander's former pages complained about getting inappropriate e-mails from Foley. Hastert's office says this is the first time they heard of concerns about Foley.
Jeff Trandahl (former Clerk of the House): Notified of Foley's e-mails to the former Louisiana page by a member of Hastert's staff in the fall of 2005, Trandahl told Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.), chairman of the Page Board, and the two of them met privately with Foley and warned him to stop contacting the 16-year-old.
Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.): Shimkus says the conversation with Trandahl in the fall of 2005 was the first he ever heard of problems with Foley. He says in retrospect, "There's stuff that everybody would have done differently."
Ted Van Der Meid (Speaker Hastert's Counsel and Floor Manager): Van Der Meid has not given his account publicly, but Trandahl is believed to have testified that he regularly informed Van Der Meid of "all issues dealing with the page program," including a "problem group of members and staff who spent too much time socializing with pages."
Rep. Tom Reynolds (R-N.Y.): About six months after it happened, in the spring of 2006, Reynolds says he learned of Foley's inappropriate e-mails to the Louisiana teen and personally raised the issue in a meeting with Speaker Hastert. Hastert has said he does not recall the conversation but does not dispute Reynolds' account.
Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio): His accounts have been contradictory. Boehner initially told the Washington Post he learned about the e-mail last spring, discussed it with Hastert, "and he told me it had been taken care of." Boehner then called the Post back to say he wasn't sure he'd spoken to Hastert after all. In subsequent interviews, he said he was "99 percent sure" he had talked to the speaker, and he "believed it had been dealt with."
Read The Blotter's Full Coverage of the Foley Internet Scandal.
October 25, 2006 in Mark Foley Internet Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (5)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The non-profit CREW say on their blog that the Ethics Panels chairman, Rep. "Doc" Hastings, was put in place to cover up any misbehavior by the House's Republican leadership. I read that as expect some lowly Rep. to publicly take the rap for them.
However voters should know the identities of the "problem group of members and staff who spent too much time socializing with pages" that ABC said they believed were described by Speaker Hastert's Counsel, Ted Van Der Meid.
Posted by: Chris Baker | Oct 25, 2006 1:27:36 PM
This is insane. Of course the stories can't line up when all of the players are lying. And of course it's easy for Dennyboy to demand investigations of people that are going to lie to save their own hides - including himself. At the end of the so-called investigation, you will still have the same people lying, and no one will be held accountable for allowing a child predator to abuse congressional pages for years.
Posted by: Chris Ketcham | Oct 25, 2006 2:05:40 PM
Hou can the Speaker of the House remain in that position. Give him the benefit of the doubt that "he doesn't recall" after all the people have testified that they spoke or sent that information to his office. Still he SHOULD have know so either he is the one who was responsible.
Posted by: Peggy Benton | Oct 26, 2006 12:20:28 AM
Covering up lies with lies, it's the good old republican way. And if that fails, they should be able to figure out a way to blame Clinton or Carter. I hope the American public are on to their slash and attack politics. They have lied to us so much, they wouldn't recognize the truth if it hit them in the face, and this is the party of morales.
Posted by: Charlie Ellenburg | Oct 26, 2006 9:08:40 AM
Apparently the House Republicans didn't get the message - shut up and do you job. Now they have to take a few more blows to their body politic and, most assuredly, retreat in shame and embarrassment from the public arena for good. No cushy consulting jobs for them. Who would want them in the same building, let alone the same office?
They deserve the attention they are so deservedly getting.
Brian Ross and his investigative team, my compliments.
Posted by: Michael Collins | Dec 8, 2006 2:10:07 AM
Post a comment
