« Previous | Main | Next »

1,245 Secret CIA Flights Revealed by European Parliament

November 28, 2006 4:56 PM

Abc_secret_prsions_060508_nr_1 The CIA flew 1,245 secret flights into European airspace, according to a European Parliament draft report obtained by ABC News.

The report is the result of a year-long investigation into secret CIA "extraordinary rendition" flights and prisons in Europe.

No European country has officially acknowledged being part of the program.

But citing records from an informal meeting of European and NATO foreign ministers last December that included Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the Parliament's draft report concludes "member states had knowledge of the programme of extraordinary rendition and secret prisons." 

The report said the recently fired head of Italian intelligence, General Nicolo Pollari, "concealed the truth" when he appeared before the Parliament's investigating committee and stated "that Italian agents played no part in any CIA kidnapping."

The report detailed the involvement of many European countries in what it called the CIA's "illegal" program.

It listed the number of CIA flights, or stopovers, it found in a number of countries.

Italy: 46 stopovers.

United Kingdom: 170 stopovers.

Germany: 336 stopovers.

Spain: 68 stopovers.

Portugal: 91 stopovers.

Ireland: 147 stopovers.

Greece: 64 stopovers

Cyprus: 57 stopovers.

Romania: 21 stopovers.

Poland: 11 stopovers.

Read the Full European Parliament Draft Report.

November 28, 2006 in CIA Secret Prisons | Permalink | User Comments (37)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It is disturbing to see that Nato members and other Caucasians and Turkey are aligned against the Third World in this secret, covert pact.

It becomes clear what the so-called terrorist are really fighting for, their very existence and control of their natural resources.

DEMOCRACY! Rule by demons.

Posted by: Willie Mason | Nov 28, 2006 5:43:41 PM

So what?

Posted by: Rob | Nov 28, 2006 5:43:43 PM

It is time to go global and cease the need for the spy agencies. Taxpayers do not benefit from them, they spend loads of money and what is the purpose and what good do they actually do, aside from lying to the taxpayers?

Posted by: blondmadison | Nov 28, 2006 5:51:05 PM

Terrorists are terrorists. Whether or not what the CIA did was right, what the terrorists do is wrong. Period.

Posted by: Craig | Nov 28, 2006 6:01:52 PM

Well, it looks like we still have some friends around the world helping us. I think that is a good thing.

Posted by: Rod M | Nov 28, 2006 6:18:35 PM

BFD.....
Oh, they are not "so called" terrorist, they ARE terrorist.
It is naïve to think that we can dispense with spy agencies. They serve a vital function for our national security.
They can certainly be vastly improved and better managed than they have been in recent history.

Posted by: bungee | Nov 28, 2006 6:37:06 PM

Good. Good over Evil. I don't think sensitive logistical information needs to be made public.

Posted by: Steve | Nov 28, 2006 7:18:38 PM

We need more secret prisons.

Posted by: George | Nov 28, 2006 7:45:45 PM

Just another attempt by the man to keep people down.

Posted by: Reggie Smith | Nov 28, 2006 8:00:49 PM

Hey Bungee, how do you know the people Bush secretly, and illegally, transported for torture ARE terrorists? Name one of them. Just one. Or are you saying our President can torture people in secret, and has no burden of proof other than saying "trust me?"

If you had ever read our Constitution, you would know we have a court system for alleged criminals. And we have it for a reason. IF they ARE terrorists, as you claim, then why couldn't Bush have brought them before a court of law to stand trial? Instead, he hid them from the world and tortured them, which suggests he didn't have enough evidence for a full, fair trial. And if he didn't have enough evidence for a trial, he sure didn't have enough evidence to torture.

Let's just hope Bush doesn't decide to randomly call YOU a terrorist one day. You can see what fate would be waiting for you.

Posted by: maureen | Nov 28, 2006 8:03:04 PM

it would be mind boggling to think how many they have done around the world.
Cutie
Kingston, Jamaica

Posted by: cutel francis | Nov 28, 2006 9:13:16 PM

We need agencies like the CIA. Somebody has to keep an eye out for potential terrorists.

Secret prisons are fine for terrorists - but who decides who is and isn't a terrorist? That's the problem. Once we allow the government to send terrorists to secret prisons, all they have to do is change the definition of 'terrorist' to send you to a secret prison.

Posted by: Chris R | Nov 28, 2006 9:21:24 PM

Wrong is wrong. It does not matter which side you are on.

If one innocent man is kidnapped its wrong.

For those who think its ok I guess you would not have a probelm spending a couple of years being tortured for the goodness of all.

I dont think you would have that opinion if it happend to you.

Posted by: Langx | Nov 28, 2006 11:10:50 PM

With over 50% of the prisoners not having any terrorist connections and some being released, this secret prison, torture business is so Hitler. how many decades will it take to get our nation back on course. All of this is completely against our constitution, why no impeachment?

Posted by: Lester | Nov 29, 2006 8:00:05 AM

These are all war crimes, violations of Geneva, and impeachable offenses.

Failure to impeach, remove, prosecute and punish, then "render" to the Hague for any pending charges make one complicit as a war criminal themselves -- aiding and abetting after the fact.

With majority power comes responsiblity -- and culpability. The LieberDems have to decide if they're with the torturers or against them. Before their 100 hours of wish-list fulfillment.

There is no middle ground.

Impeachment IS our postive agenda.

It is our ONLY moral, patriotic option.

--

Posted by: thedeanpeople | Nov 29, 2006 10:07:24 AM

"Instead, he hid them from the world and tortured them..."

Maureen,
To paraphrase what YOU said, how do you know they were tortured? Name one of them. Just one.

You seem very interested in believing the negative...

Posted by: Ric | Nov 29, 2006 4:12:32 PM

so whats a few flts and jails between friends, anyhow?

Posted by: goetz | Nov 29, 2006 4:46:44 PM

Agree they need to go through due process, wtf since when did the President become King? I thought the founding fathers created a revolution because of this....

Posted by: Aaron C | Nov 29, 2006 5:29:28 PM

"Maureen,
To paraphrase what YOU said, how do you know they were tortured? Name one of them. Just one. - goetz"

I can name more than one:
Mohammad Al-Zery and Khaled el-Masri, among others - both innocent, both kidnapped by the CIA and "rendered" to countries where they were tortured. A great many have been "rendered" to Uzbekistan where torture is systematic and includes drowning and suffocation, rape quite commonly, and also immersion of limbs in boiling liquid.

Posted by: Vierotchka | Nov 29, 2006 8:57:32 PM

Some of you kill me....talking about constitutional rights and due process...these people don't have any rights! They aren't Americans! They want to kill you, how can you be so naive? There are evils in this world and things need to be done "under the table" and out of the publics eye for the publics on good. The day we start treating terrorists as victims is the day we lose. Some of you are really out of touch with reality. Pick up a history book sometime.

Posted by: Jeffrey | Nov 29, 2006 10:11:42 PM

Post a comment