BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Abramoff Reports to Prison; Officials Focus on Reid, Others
November 15, 2006 1:23 PM
As convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff reported to federal prison today, a source close to the investigation surrounding his activities told ABC News that Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was one of the members of Congress Abramoff had allegedly implicated in his cooperation with federal prosecutors.
A spokesperson for Reid, elected yesterday as the Senate Majority Leader, said the senator had done nothing illegal or unethical.
"We have no idea what Abramoff is telling prosecutors to save his skin, but I do know that these kind of old allegations are completely ridiculous and untrue," Sen. Reid's spokesman Jim Manley told ABC News.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
A source close to the investigation says Abramoff told prosecutors that more than $30,000 in campaign contributions to Reid from Abramoff's clients "were no accident and were in fact requested by Reid."
Abramoff has reportedly claimed the Nevada senator agreed to help him on matters related to Indian gambling.
The Associated Press reported earlier this year that Reid wrote at least four letters helpful to the tribes that had contributed money to his campaign.
Reid has denied there was any connection between the letters and the contributions and has said he is a longtime opponent of certain kinds of Indian reservation gambling.
The AP reported that Reid acknowledged "routine contacts" with Abramoff's lobbying partners and intervening to block rival tribal casinos.
The AP also reported that Abramoff's billing records showed extensive contact with Reid's office over a three-year period in which Reid collected more than $68,000 from Abramoff's firm, partners and clients.
Prosecutors have said that Abramoff's cooperation is essential to the corruption investigation, but, so far, they have brought only one prosecution against a member of Congress connected to Abramoff, Republican Bob Ney of Ohio, who resigned.
The source said prosecutors do not intend to rely solely on Abramoff's account of events, and his allegations against Reid and others will not necessarily result in criminal charges.
Sources close to the federal investigation say Abramoff has offered testimony about his contacts with "six to eight seriously corrupt Democratic senators" and an ever larger number of Republican members of Congress.
In addition to Reid, the sources say Abramoff has been most closely questioned about his contacts with Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.), who was defeated in last week's election.
"Being defeated may have been one of the best things that ever happened to Burns," said a source close to the investigation. "There is much more interest in members of Congress who are still in office," the source said.
Burns, who received more than $150,000 in Abramoff-connected campaign contributions, has strongly denied any wrongdoing and returned the money.
Sen. Reid has been an outspoken critic of the connections between Abramoff and Republican legislators.
In a speech earlier this year, Sen. Reid described it as "a program where the lobbyists paid and the Republican members of Congress played."
The Justice Department said it would have no comment on the ongoing Abramoff investigation.
November 15, 2006 in Abramoff Lobbying Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (418)
Typical, Rep get nailed, Dems got off
Posted by: steve | Nov 15, 2006 1:43:27 PM
Ooh, you mean the squeaky-clean Dems took money from Abramoff too? By the news coverage before the election, you would've thought only the GOP was involved. Funny how that works, isn't? If evidence emerges of criminal conduct, I guarantee the Dems will ELEVATE that crook through their ranks...that's the Dem way.
Posted by: Rick | Nov 15, 2006 1:43:58 PM
Here's a surprise... Harry Reid is corrupt. Next you are going to tell me that Sen. Byrd is a racist who was part of the KKK (notice the sarcasm). I say get rid of all of the corrupt members of Congress from ALL parties, not just the Republicans. Wake up America, the Republicans are not the only party with corrupt members. The difference is that when a Republican gets caught, they at least do the right thing and resign.
Posted by: Eric S. | Nov 15, 2006 1:46:05 PM
Democrats play nasty and the MSM plays right along with them. Partners in crime.
Posted by: Jen | Nov 15, 2006 1:48:09 PM
Typical, corrupt Reps trying to drag Dems with them.
Posted by: Eric | Nov 15, 2006 1:48:59 PM
I wonder why ABC would sit on this story until after the elections?
Posted by: NeoLiberal | Nov 15, 2006 1:49:29 PM
It will be interesting to see if the media attacks the dirty dems with the same ferocity as they do dirty republicans. Somehow I doubt they will.
Posted by: Mike | Nov 15, 2006 1:49:37 PM
Funny how this only seems to be news AFTER the election.....
And they say there is no liberal bias.....yeah, right.
Posted by: Ed Davis | Nov 15, 2006 1:49:48 PM
That's funny. News about Harry Reid's "interesting" land deal was out there weeks before the election. ABC and others determined that it wasn't important enough to report on. Now that the election is over, this is becoming news. I'm glad ABC and others have no agenda.
Posted by: Jeff Daniels | Nov 15, 2006 1:50:25 PM
The liberal media completely igneored the $1 million Bribe that Reid took from his land developer friend in Las Vegas which did make the news breiefly before the election but was over shadowed by big gay foley's e-mails in the libturd news. Now it turns out reid was taking big bribes from Abramoff as well.
Maybe Lincoln Jeffords has room in his freezer for Harry's cash as well.
Posted by: Joe Mahmah | Nov 15, 2006 1:51:36 PM
Remember Dems are held to a different, not the same or higher standard...for them to receive bribes and be part of corruption is all acceptible as long as they are perceived as looking out for the working and middle class...
Posted by: Tony | Nov 15, 2006 1:51:36 PM
Isn't it OBVIOUS?!? Abramoff was/is/and will ALWAYS be a DEMOCRAT!!!! Don't you get it? He SET UP the Republicans before the elections for the Dems, and now that his New York ass is behind bars he starts naming the Dems who refuse to save him.
Typical shameless Dem move. Nice job America!
Posted by: eris | Nov 15, 2006 1:51:44 PM
boxer and pelosi and/or their family members worked for indian casino in calif.
Posted by: kevin hawkins | Nov 15, 2006 1:51:47 PM
Well, when Harry Reid says Abrahamoff is lying, we're supposed to believe him. But of course if a Republican says it THEY are lying.
And the Dems elected him their leader again, along with their soon to be majority leader in the house Jack Murtha.
The most transparently corrupt congress in history? They put them out front and center now, don't they. It's like they're rubbing it in America's face now.
Posted by: Roman | Nov 15, 2006 1:52:17 PM
I could not have said it any better...Ditto
Posted by: Bryan K | Nov 15, 2006 1:52:33 PM
If any serving Politician is suspected of having been involved in corrupt practises, that Politician should step down from any committees he / she serves on, so as to allow as speedy an investigation as possible, without seriously disrupting the administration or the workings of Congress.
Posted by: Stuart | Nov 15, 2006 1:52:42 PM
Great reporting Brian Ross. This has been known for a long time, of course you, MSM, only start to promote AFTER the mid-term elections. You hypocrite.
Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 1:52:46 PM
I'm absolutely sickened by all the double talk coming out of D.C. I completely agree that no matter what party they're from, ALL corrupt congressmen and women should resign....Power really goes to people's heads, no matter what their political persuasion.
Posted by: Keisha | Nov 15, 2006 1:52:55 PM
Of course none of this information was known prior to election day? hmmmmm....
Posted by: Dirty Harry | Nov 15, 2006 1:53:25 PM
Gee, ABC wouldn't have held this story until AFTER the elections, would they?
NAHHHHHHHHHHHHH....
Posted by: Tony | Nov 15, 2006 1:53:30 PM
Why did you wait until after the election to break this news!?
Posted by: Bobby K. | Nov 15, 2006 1:53:41 PM
Well if Harry Reid is convicted, I hope at least then Joe Lieberman will support the party that helped him get reelected which was not the dems nor the inds.
Posted by: Bill | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:14 PM
I find in funny that Brian Ross breaks this story on Reid AFTER the elections.....hmmmmm.....
Posted by: Charles Cox | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:19 PM
Will this lead the evening news? I think not!
Posted by: Steve | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:31 PM
Of course for every corrupt Democrat taking 100,000 dollars, there are usually ten corrupt Republicans, each taking 1,000,000 dollars.
It is about the average numbers, not about exceptions. On the average, the Democrats are 10 times more ethical than GOP.
Posted by: Paul | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:50 PM
It is never good to hear that any of our members of Congress are corrupt, but I'm thankful that the media is finally doing it's job. I am a Republican and am sicknened by my party's recent scandals, especially Rep Foley. Harry Reid's land deal was barely touched on by the media because he was a Democrat. Now that the Dems are in control, the media might just do it's job. If my party losing the Congress enables reporters to report on both parties, then I am thankful we lost. It is time for an agendaless media and one that holds everyone accountable, not just the party they do not like. Thank you Brian Ross.
Posted by: Heather M Fearnside | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:51 PM
yeah, like ney did the right thing?? idiots
Posted by: joe | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:56 PM
I'M SHOCKED! SHOCKED!
Posted by: Zippie | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:57 PM
Here's a tip for B.R.: Pelosi has undocumanted workers at her vineyard and non-union workers. Go get 'em Sherlock.
Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 1:55:21 PM
If ABC had this kind of information, why did they release it after the elections and not before the elections? Coming from ABC nothing surprises me...remember the recent Elizabeth Vargas bogus picture breastfeeding a baby while reporting the news? ABC is biased and I'm not the least suprised.
Posted by: Tony | Nov 15, 2006 1:55:37 PM
I demand that ABC gleefully publishes the text messages between these two!
Posted by: ROS | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:01 PM
How about a re-vote?
Posted by: William the Impeached | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:13 PM
and if Ross and ABC didn't have this info before the election I am the tooth fairy!
Posted by: susan boyer | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:19 PM
Let's see just how fast the Dems try to sweep this little nugget under the rug now that they're in charge.
Posted by: Heather | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:23 PM
Of course this will not count as part of "the most ethical congress" in history claims by the Dems as they begin to hang themselves. Where was this for the past few weeks/months?? How convenient.
Posted by: Edward | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:34 PM
Justify it Paul, Justify it.
Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:48 PM
At least Conrad Burns gave the money back. What has Corrupt Politician posterchild Harry Reid done?
Posted by: Valisa Wheeler | Nov 15, 2006 1:57:13 PM
Nothing stays hidden. Nothing.
Posted by: Rexy | Nov 15, 2006 1:57:55 PM
Amazing how all that enfo about the corrupt DEMS managed to stay out of the news until AFTER the electon. And the MSM wonders why their numbers are so far BEHIND FOX NEWS. Because you lie and omit and obfuscate and shill for the DEMORATS and you do not even try to hide it anymore. Congratulations. This election cycle proved this once and for all.
ABC,CBS,CNN,NBC,MSNBC I refuse to watch and stopped when CNN felt it okay to show snipers killing American soldiers but wont even call them terrorist. would not want to hurt their little feelings.
GO TO HELL
BEth
Posted by: beth n | Nov 15, 2006 1:58:27 PM
Interesting how Republicans involved in scandals resign and Democrats involved in scandals just keep getting re-elected!
Posted by: mark | Nov 15, 2006 1:58:39 PM
Status Quo anyone? If a Republican steps on an ant he is anti-environment, but a Dem must rape and pillage before you hear more than a peap in the media.
Posted by: Micah Fincher | Nov 15, 2006 1:58:43 PM
The media worked too hard to elect Democrats to allow simple corruption to dash their hopes for a more Western European USA.
Posted by: R.Dahl | Nov 15, 2006 1:58:45 PM
I agree, I agree, I agree, however, Republicans have become fat and happy. I gave the NRCC 5k in hopes of them winning. They have gone far away from the days of Gingrich and the "Contract with America". They re-elected Lott, who is nothing more than a yes/no boy for the Dems. He's the primary reason Clinton didn't get removed from office. The Republicans have forgotten their base. America is not to blame for Dems winning. Republicans are.
Posted by: Rick P | Nov 15, 2006 1:59:09 PM
I say give Abramoff the Congressional Metal Of Honor for his testamony. I live in the McCain (*!.*!)state and we know crooks, even neighbors to the North like Reid. Yes, give Abramoff a CMOH, a gold watch, full congressional retirement benefits, and our Thanks for all he has and is doing for our country.
Posted by: George | Nov 15, 2006 1:59:18 PM
Reid, Murtha and Pelosi are a part of the "Axis of Corruption." Oh the so called "investigations" are going to go both ways, Thank God.. Corruption runs deep in both parties; but much deeper in the Dems court.
We were spared Hurricans this year, but the hurricane to destroy America happened during this election. I call it "AMERICA THE STUPID[ful]."
Posted by: Odie | Nov 15, 2006 1:59:23 PM
Wait, you mean ABC is finally going to admit that Reid's corruption goes beyond the shady land deal he did - I don't believe it. Y'all are sure right though, it is odd how ABC held off putting any of this information out until AFTER the election.
Maybe, just maybe, someone at ABC will post a message explaining why.
Posted by: Rad | Nov 15, 2006 1:59:45 PM
Exactly. In fact they take it one step further and instead of resigning, they slander other officials for completely irrelevant reasons and that are completely uninvolved with the same scenario just to pass the blame. But such is politics. We can only pray for the day when we can vote for a person based on their policy and ability to stay true to their word and not for how well they can pass the blame of their mistakes.
Posted by: Sean H. | Nov 15, 2006 2:00:11 PM
Why didn't Brian Ross report this before the election?
Posted by: Don | Nov 15, 2006 2:00:12 PM
Term Limits anyone? Senators and Representatives are to be Statesmen, not career politicians with their hands in the till.
Posted by: Valisa Wheeler | Nov 15, 2006 2:00:21 PM
Harry Reid has dirty hands--and everyone knew it before the election.
Posted by: Traci | Nov 15, 2006 2:00:27 PM
Snoooze.
Wake me when there is news.
Posted by: tommy | Nov 15, 2006 2:00:27 PM
I question the timing.
Posted by: Linda | Nov 15, 2006 2:00:36 PM
Reid, Murtha and Pelosi are a part of the "Axis of Corruption." Oh the so called "investigations" are going to go both ways, Thank God.. Corruption runs deep in both parties; but much deeper in the Dems court.
We were spared Hurricans this year, but the hurricane to destroy America happened during this election. I call it "AMERICA THE STUPID[ful]."
Posted by: Odie | Nov 15, 2006 2:00:58 PM
PAUL -
Are you kidding me??? So it's okay to be corrupt, as long as you are not as corrupt as your political enemy? Let's examine the Dems and let's see which party is more corrupt. Let's start with William Jefferson of LA. then let's go to Murtha and of course do we need to mention Ted Kennedy and his great driving skills. Wake up and smell the hypocracy!
Posted by: Eric S. | Nov 15, 2006 2:01:10 PM
How could a senator from Nevada have a legitimate interest in casinos?
Posted by: Poops. | Nov 15, 2006 2:01:29 PM
Wow, it seams as if this nothing more than a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Reid denies being unethical and all his dealings with Abramoff were on the up and up. Funny how everyone else that knew Jack Abramoff are saying the same thing. What else did you expect from the hypocrites we send to Washington?
I personally think we need to run all them out of town, start over, and form one party - The People for a Better America Party. Yes, I know this runs contrary to our current system, but I do know that most 'average' Americans only want what's best for our country. The only difference being which road we take to get there.
Our current politicians like to say they have the coutry's best interest in mind. Yea, right! If you believe that, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you.
Posted by: Rick W. | Nov 15, 2006 2:01:29 PM
Let's see here, Nanci Polosi supports an ethics challanged Murtha for a House leadership spot, Reid, who makes money on land deals and now this. Um, is it no wonder why for the first time in 30 years I chose not to vote? The entire congress is a scam. So sorry to say. I have finally given up. Senators and Reps are only there for themselves.
Posted by: dustylenz | Nov 15, 2006 2:02:13 PM
Ok Steve, so the Dems are 10 times more ethical than the GOP. Come on, get real. All polititions are corrupt whether they take 100k or 1 mil. I'm just interested in seeing what happens with this "new ethical" congress now that Pelosi is in charge.
Posted by: Heather | Nov 15, 2006 2:02:29 PM
How about Reid's bridge to his property in Arizona? How much will he make off of that pork? How many sons of Reid are Lobbyists? Scratch that itch Ross.
Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 2:02:43 PM
"Of course for every corrupt Democrat taking 100,000 dollars, there are usually ten corrupt Republicans, each taking 1,000,000 dollars.
It is about the average numbers, not about exceptions. On the average, the Democrats are 10 times more ethical than GOP."
ROFLMAO - That's the best spin I've heard yet. Sigh, the repub's kick theirs out, the dem's make them Majority Leaders. This is going to be fun!
Posted by: Joe | Nov 15, 2006 2:02:47 PM
Once again, the media should be ashamed of themselves for the way they covered the Abramoff scandal. It denotes arrogance and ignorance to supplant the truth with ones own partisan beliefs.
Posted by: Keystone | Nov 15, 2006 2:02:48 PM
...and for every delusional Republican who thinks they're party is cleaner there are usually 10 delusional Dems!!!
Posted by: travis | Nov 15, 2006 2:03:02 PM
I agree Bo. Paul is typical of people making ignorant statements without facts to back them up. This article doesn't even address the millions that Reid made a few years ago in real estate. He didn't report the cash until he was caught. The media didn't cover that either.
Posted by: Jonathan | Nov 15, 2006 2:03:11 PM
I am sure we will see Reid resign sometime soon.... won't we?
Posted by: CHRIS | Nov 15, 2006 2:03:27 PM
Reid, Murtha and Pelosi are a part of the "Axis of Corruption." Oh the so called "investigations" are going to go both ways, Thank God.. Corruption runs deep in both parties; but much deeper in the Dems court.
We were spared Hurricans this year, but the hurricane to destroy America happened during this election. I call it "AMERICA THE STUPID[ful]."
Posted by: Odie | Nov 15, 2006 2:03:27 PM
Why would anyone at ABC post a message explaining themselves. Most of America knows they are part of the Democrat Propaganda machine. Just look at those ratings they get. The only reason I found this space is through a more balanced site.
Posted by: steve | Nov 15, 2006 2:03:30 PM
Where were you Mr. Ross before the election? Why didn't you run these stories after the election? Perfect case of a Univ.of Iowa inferiority complex coming through! How come you didn't tell people before the election about the following:
Foley - Resigned.. for salacious IMs.
It was right he resigned but do a google and see 10,500 results.. yet during the same Mainstream Media bias ing the public about the bad GOP, why not tell people about William Jefferson the Demo who is on tape taking a $100,000 bribe.
Google 805 results.
Or how about Bob Ney GOP RESIGNED
Results 1 - 100 of about 4,400 for Bob Ney. But at the same time, when Ney RESIGNED we still have in office:
Kennedy - drowned girl
Alcee Hastings- impeached Judge for taking Bribes
Murtha - still in office on ABSCAM tapes for bribes.
Franks - having a male prostitution ring running out of his D.C. house still in office.
Studds - now dead but when in office ASSAULTED A 17 YR OLD PAGE and the democrat congress applauded him when he won re-election!
So the point I'm making here is all you've done by NOW COMING out with these stories is reinforce my suspicions as well as a lot of other people as evidenced by declining viewer/readers as we are getting our FACTS from less biased sources.
Thanks for putting the integrity and honest of the journalism courses I took at Iowa where we learned "reporters don't make the news...they report the news" as william Paley said. Please simply tell the truth and not manage the truth.
Posted by: Bushsupporter | Nov 15, 2006 2:03:56 PM
Reid, Murtha and Pelosi are a part of the "Axis of Corruption." Oh the so called "investigations" are going to go both ways, Thank God.. Corruption runs deep in both parties; but much deeper in the Dems court.
We were spared Hurricans this year, but the hurricane to destroy America happened during this election. I call it "AMERICA THE STUPID[ful]."
Posted by: Odie | Nov 15, 2006 2:04:36 PM
We'll just wait a few years and see what the "corruption free" democrats look like. just remember that absolute power corrupts absoloutely
Posted by: rory | Nov 15, 2006 2:04:52 PM
Dear Rad, you must be kidding their political director, Halperin is closely connected to George Soros-----that should answer the question. Wait until the crap hits about Murtha, what joyless time in Mudville.
Posted by: Art | Nov 15, 2006 2:05:30 PM
steve: so corruption depends on the amount you recieve.....lol
Posted by: judy | Nov 15, 2006 2:07:06 PM
Well put, Bushsupporter. Your blog says it all. Well Done!
Posted by: Eric S. | Nov 15, 2006 2:07:15 PM
What's next? Election fraud? Oh yes, the democrats didn't lose so there wasn't any election fraud.
Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 2:07:33 PM
In the past 5 years, the only corrupt Democrat I remember to be indicted and kicked out of office, was James Traficant.
Now, compare that to the number of Republicans that were indicted in the same time period.
And no, the justice system has no Liberal bias. But Reality does.
Posted by: Paul | Nov 15, 2006 2:07:58 PM
A convicted flon says Reid is corrupt because he took campain contributions from Indian groups. Republicans jump at the bait and howl about 'liberal media bias' since it was not reported prior to the elections. How utterly predictable.
Well here's a news flash: Reid took campaign contributions from Indian groups long before Abramoff was in the picture. He was a ranking member of the Indain Affairs committee for years. It is not unusual or unethical for congressmen to get campaign contributions from groups who are directly impacted by that congressperson's committee assignments.
What is unethical is a quid pro quo arrangement. And there is no evidence of that at all. THAT is a Republican speciality.
Posted by: Crackwhore | Nov 15, 2006 2:10:04 PM
If Reid is investigated and charged- then he's on equal footing with the various GOP members who were involved with Abrahamoff. And there is a difference between guys actually charged with breaking the law (the various GOP figures) and an accusation against someone. But if Reid is dirty, he has to go. Corruption is bipartisan and does none of us any good.
Posted by: PD | Nov 15, 2006 2:10:24 PM
You mean Brian Ross didn't know anything about this before the election? Mr. "investigative-reporter Ross," knew nothing about this...? Please,....ABC and all of the other liberal networks had information about Dingy Harry Reid and the other Democratic Senators that will be implicated in the scandal long before now.
Posted by: Ryan | Nov 15, 2006 2:10:27 PM
That's right Paul, the rest were swept under the rug and promoted. Read above posts.
Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 2:10:31 PM
How dare they insinuate Harry Reid is corrupt when he took $$$ from Abrahamoff; he was owed that money for the political favors he did for good ole Abe; the letters of solicitation favor for Abe from the Indian Tribes shoul not be held against ever so crooked Harry; he is kind of special don't you know, after all he is the big kahona of the Dems in the Senate and openly gets out in front of the micriphones and tells us how innocent his taking of the money is. Like the profits from developers he forgot to remember the land sold and still recoreded on his Senate Financial statement as his; then collects over a cool million from the developer years later for his mysterious eeal making...Poooor Harry. Harry, Harry, Harry, it's your time to do time.
Posted by: Don Medbery | Nov 15, 2006 2:11:41 PM
Brian Ross note to self:
- release republican scandals before the election
- democratic scandals after
- don't mention Reid's million dollars in profit from a shady land deal
Posted by: finny | Nov 15, 2006 2:11:53 PM
Paul, what do you mean the justice system has no Liberal bias. How do you think the democrats were able to pass all of their stuff off on us over the past 6 years!
Posted by: Steve | Nov 15, 2006 2:11:57 PM
ABC, CBS and NBC are little more than Democrat campaign programs! One should not expect anything more from these tilted organizations.
Posted by: Howard | Nov 15, 2006 2:12:45 PM
Umm...okay...help me understand something. Abramoff is a Republican, right? Of course, as a Republican he is going to implicate his fellow Republicans before implicating a Democrat?! You mean to tell me, that if Reid obviously broke the law, it wouldn't have been dug out by the neo-cons BEFORE the election?! Seriously...this whole Republican-Democrat blind loyalty is getting so old. Do any of you who reply here EVER think an independant thought outside of your party affiliation? Lemmings!
Posted by: Steve | Nov 15, 2006 2:13:47 PM
Not to excuse ANY corrupt member of our government, but I find it very interesting how ABC continues the attempt to frame Abramoff as a Democrat problem, which is simply laughable. For all those Republican posters who apparently cannot read:
"....six to eight 'seriously corrupt Democratic senators' and an ever larger number of Republican members of Congress."
And an EVEN LARGER NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN MEMBERS. Get it? But funny how we don't have any of their names, do we. Huh, just a coincidence, I'm sure.
Abramoff was, is, and CONTINUES to be 95% a REPUBLICAN PROBLEM- he's Tom DeLay's boy, and was doing exactly what DeLay and the GOP required of him.
Attempting to emphasize Reid's alleged role in this doesn't change that fact, sorry 'bout that, Republicans.
Posted by: bob | Nov 15, 2006 2:13:54 PM
So now the DEMS have Reid - guilty of corrupt land deals, and illegal campaign money. Byrd - ex-KKK. Kennedy - got off for murder. Murtha - Abscam. Bary Franks - Gay protstitution ring in his house. Hillary - Whitewater...and many more. What a leadership group.
Posted by: Scott | Nov 15, 2006 2:14:17 PM
Scandal! ABC News is owned by the ABC network, which is owned by Disney. When Americans waste discretionary income on gambling and spend vacation days at casinos instead of theme parks, who loses revenue? DISNEY. This ABC report is simply an attack on the supporters of big gambling by the news-reporting wing of big entertainment. If Mark Foley had suggested a trip to the Magic Kingdom with those pages he so admired, he would still be in office today.
Posted by: Michael | Nov 15, 2006 2:14:20 PM
All we can hope for is that every one of the politicians that took bribes, including Reid and Murtha, get the same deal Spiro Agnew did, resign immediately or almost certainly go to jail.
Posted by: Keating | Nov 15, 2006 2:15:00 PM
Give ABC some credit -- I say some, as in, a tiny bit. Reuters's story today on Abamoff's prison appointment is still spinning that he was but a "Republican lobbyist."
Posted by: Ken | Nov 15, 2006 2:17:52 PM
Thad Cochrane may be the only honest senator
Posted by: ogop | Nov 15, 2006 2:18:02 PM
Hey Bob, ""....six to eight 'seriously corrupt Democratic senators' and an ever larger number of Republican members of Congress."
And an EVEN LARGER NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN MEMBERS."
What exactly is the larger number? Nine? We aren't exactly told are we? That's called PROPAGANDA!
Posted by: Steve | Nov 15, 2006 2:18:06 PM
Funny how the mainstream media thinks this is news AFTER the election, I read about this months ago on the internet and Harry has alot more bones buried in the backyard......
Posted by: Ed Davis | Nov 15, 2006 2:18:22 PM
Of course there is going to be corrupt Dems. Corruption works on both sides of the aisle, especially to reach that level of politics. Some of them will be pulled into the Abromoff mess as well. It became a Republican problem when Tom Delay insisted on stacking K street lobbying firms with Republicans and the way the Republican majority routinely cut Dem
