« Previous | Main | Next »

Abramoff Reports to Prison; Officials Focus on Reid, Others

November 15, 2006 1:23 PM

Reid_nr As convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff reported to federal prison today, a source close to the investigation surrounding his activities told ABC News that Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was one of the members of Congress Abramoff had allegedly implicated in his cooperation with federal prosecutors.

A spokesperson for Reid, elected yesterday as the Senate Majority Leader, said the senator had done nothing illegal or unethical.

"We have no idea what Abramoff is telling prosecutors to save his skin, but I do know that these kind of old allegations are completely ridiculous and untrue," Sen. Reid's spokesman Jim Manley told ABC News. 

A source close to the investigation says Abramoff told prosecutors that more than $30,000 in campaign contributions to Reid from Abramoff's clients "were no accident and were in fact requested by Reid."

Abramoff has reportedly claimed the Nevada senator agreed to help him on matters related to Indian gambling. 

The Associated Press reported earlier this year that Reid wrote at least four letters helpful to the tribes that had contributed money to his campaign.

Reid has denied there was any connection between the letters and the contributions and has said he is a longtime opponent of certain kinds of Indian reservation gambling.

The AP reported that Reid acknowledged "routine contacts" with Abramoff's lobbying partners and intervening to block rival tribal casinos.

The AP also reported that Abramoff's billing records showed extensive contact with Reid's office over a three-year period in which Reid collected more than $68,000 from Abramoff's firm, partners and clients.

Prosecutors have said that Abramoff's cooperation is essential to the corruption investigation, but, so far, they have brought only one prosecution against a member of Congress connected to Abramoff, Republican Bob Ney of Ohio, who resigned.

The source said prosecutors do not intend to rely solely on Abramoff's account of events, and his allegations against Reid and others will not necessarily result in criminal charges.   

Sources close to the federal investigation say Abramoff has offered testimony about his contacts with "six to eight seriously corrupt Democratic senators" and an ever larger number of Republican members of Congress.

In addition to Reid, the sources say Abramoff has been most closely questioned about his contacts with Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.), who was defeated in last week's election.

"Being defeated may have been one of the best things that ever happened to Burns," said a source close to the investigation. "There is much more interest in members of Congress who are still in office," the source said.

Burns, who received more than $150,000 in Abramoff-connected campaign contributions, has strongly denied any wrongdoing and returned the money.

Sen. Reid has been an outspoken critic of the connections between Abramoff and Republican legislators.

In a speech earlier this year, Sen. Reid described it as "a program where the lobbyists paid and the Republican members of Congress played."

The Justice Department said it would have no comment on the ongoing Abramoff investigation.

November 15, 2006 in Abramoff Lobbying Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (418)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why did you wait until after the election to break this news!?

Posted by: Bobby K. | Nov 15, 2006 1:53:41 PM

Well if Harry Reid is convicted, I hope at least then Joe Lieberman will support the party that helped him get reelected which was not the dems nor the inds.

Posted by: Bill | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:14 PM

I find in funny that Brian Ross breaks this story on Reid AFTER the elections.....hmmmmm.....

Posted by: Charles Cox | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:19 PM

Will this lead the evening news? I think not!

Posted by: Steve | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:31 PM

Of course for every corrupt Democrat taking 100,000 dollars, there are usually ten corrupt Republicans, each taking 1,000,000 dollars.
It is about the average numbers, not about exceptions. On the average, the Democrats are 10 times more ethical than GOP.

Posted by: Paul | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:50 PM

It is never good to hear that any of our members of Congress are corrupt, but I'm thankful that the media is finally doing it's job. I am a Republican and am sicknened by my party's recent scandals, especially Rep Foley. Harry Reid's land deal was barely touched on by the media because he was a Democrat. Now that the Dems are in control, the media might just do it's job. If my party losing the Congress enables reporters to report on both parties, then I am thankful we lost. It is time for an agendaless media and one that holds everyone accountable, not just the party they do not like. Thank you Brian Ross.

Posted by: Heather M Fearnside | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:51 PM

yeah, like ney did the right thing?? idiots

Posted by: joe | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:56 PM

I'M SHOCKED! SHOCKED!

Posted by: Zippie | Nov 15, 2006 1:54:57 PM

Here's a tip for B.R.: Pelosi has undocumanted workers at her vineyard and non-union workers. Go get 'em Sherlock.

Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 1:55:21 PM

If ABC had this kind of information, why did they release it after the elections and not before the elections? Coming from ABC nothing surprises me...remember the recent Elizabeth Vargas bogus picture breastfeeding a baby while reporting the news? ABC is biased and I'm not the least suprised.

Posted by: Tony | Nov 15, 2006 1:55:37 PM

I demand that ABC gleefully publishes the text messages between these two!

Posted by: ROS | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:01 PM

How about a re-vote?

Posted by: William the Impeached | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:13 PM

and if Ross and ABC didn't have this info before the election I am the tooth fairy!

Posted by: susan boyer | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:19 PM

Let's see just how fast the Dems try to sweep this little nugget under the rug now that they're in charge.

Posted by: Heather | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:23 PM

Of course this will not count as part of "the most ethical congress" in history claims by the Dems as they begin to hang themselves. Where was this for the past few weeks/months?? How convenient.

Posted by: Edward | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:34 PM

Justify it Paul, Justify it.

Posted by: Bo | Nov 15, 2006 1:56:48 PM

At least Conrad Burns gave the money back. What has Corrupt Politician posterchild Harry Reid done?

Posted by: Valisa Wheeler | Nov 15, 2006 1:57:13 PM

Nothing stays hidden. Nothing.

Posted by: Rexy | Nov 15, 2006 1:57:55 PM

Amazing how all that enfo about the corrupt DEMS managed to stay out of the news until AFTER the electon. And the MSM wonders why their numbers are so far BEHIND FOX NEWS. Because you lie and omit and obfuscate and shill for the DEMORATS and you do not even try to hide it anymore. Congratulations. This election cycle proved this once and for all.
ABC,CBS,CNN,NBC,MSNBC I refuse to watch and stopped when CNN felt it okay to show snipers killing American soldiers but wont even call them terrorist. would not want to hurt their little feelings.

GO TO HELL

BEth

Posted by: beth n | Nov 15, 2006 1:58:27 PM

Interesting how Republicans involved in scandals resign and Democrats involved in scandals just keep getting re-elected!

Posted by: mark | Nov 15, 2006 1:58:39 PM

Post a comment