BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Sunni Insurgents Still Causing Most U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq
November 06, 2006 3:45 PM
The vast majority -- more than 80 percent -- of American military deaths in Iraq are still being caused by Sunni insurgents, according to an ABC News analysis of data released for the month of October by the Defense Department.
Of the 99 American soldiers killed in hostile action, at least 81 were killed by IED's or hostile fire in areas that are dominated by Sunni Arabs and where U.S. forces have been battling Sunni insurgents since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
By contrast, only three Americans were killed in areas dominated by Shiite Arabs. Fifteen were killed in central Baghdad where populations are mixed with Sunni and Shiite Arabs, and it is therefore difficult to determine the identity of the attackers.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Counter-insurgency analysts tell ABC News that the high percentage of deaths in the Sunni areas represents compelling evidence that Sunni insurgents remain the primary threat to the security of U.S. personnel. "If American troops are getting killed in predominantly Sunni areas, then they are getting killed by Sunni insurgents," Caleb Carr, Professor of Counter-Insurgency at Bard College, told ABC News.
IEDs continue to be the leading killer of Americans -- 65 percent, 42 U.S. soldiers were killed by roadside bombs. Thirty-four Americans were killed by "small arms fire," "hostile fire" or snipers.
U.S. military officials attribute the October death toll, which is the highest since January 2005, to several factors, including stepped-up U.S. counter-insurgency operations in Baghdad.
Forty-three U.S. soldiers were killed in Baghdad and surrounding environs, more deaths than any other area in Iraq. The majority, 67 percent of those killed, were in Sunni-controlled areas.
Despite the geographic data, U.S. military officials seemed unprepared or unwilling to describe which groups were causing the majority of U.S. casualties. When asked whether Americans were being killed primarily by Sunni or Shiite militants, Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, Director of the Combined Press Information Center for the Multi-National Forces in Iraq, said that he did not have the breakdown. "I would not want to categorize that...I would just be guessing," he said.
Counter-insurgency experts dismissed the notion that Shiite extremists could be infiltrating the Sunni areas to kill Americans. "The one thing we know for sure in the Muslim world in general, not just Iraq, is that everybody knows what the radicals are up to," said Professor Carr. "There are no hidden Shiite activists hiding out in Sunni areas because the populations won't tolerate it."
November 6, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (9)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Why would anyone expect the followers of Saddam to welcome the U.S. troops?
The journalism about this war sounds like sensationalistic fake patriotic emotional embellishments, like propaganda.
Why aren't Iraqi bodies being counted like U.S. soldiers?
Who gives the U.S. politicians a license to lie to the peoples of the U.S.? I mean they lie about everything from aliens to income--this is supposedly for the good of the people?
I've had enough of the lies.
Posted by: blondmadison | Nov 6, 2006 4:20:54 PM
Scorn the boasts of valour
That deceit implied when sin
Is dressed to give advantage
To those who live to win
To place upon the vanquished
Those no longer free
A crushing yoke of tribute
That salutes false victory
As word becomes mere token
One traded in the dark
One remit with honour
One tendered for a lark
Mere propagandist perjure
Of the innocent and lame
A talent, in the service
Of those that have no shame
John Stretch
Posted by: John Stretch | Nov 6, 2006 6:26:22 PM
how can a country that enslaved millions of people xtermenated the indians forced the chinese to build the neo colonial empire think it could do good on the pretext of freedom when america to this day is far from being free and equal
Posted by: damon | Nov 6, 2006 6:37:51 PM
US failure in Iraq is in the fact that US allowed the elections and constitutions written by the natives who were not raised or have the current capacity to understand the democracy. Instead US should have provided a consititution similar to what we have done in Japan. Then use our troops to enforce it. Have that dicatorial relationship between US and Iraque for 10-15 years, and then after that it would have been Ok, and in that time we would not have lost solders. There would have been no clerics running with their own armies, no pro-hezbolla demonstrations, no questions about who the oil belongs to (the proceeds would have been managed by US).
So Kurds would be Ok with that, Shia would complain a little but still would be ok, and we would kill most of the sunnis that threaten our troops by now.
And the civilian population would concentrate on their daily lives going about their business/school/etc. That would have been a much better example to the rest of the Arab world as well.
Essentially for US to counter terrorism, US has to be a lot more
forcefull. Declining to apply
Geneva convention against the terrorist forces or anyone who has not officially signed that convention should have been appropriate as well. So that US soldiers can use weapons that are effective, instead of 'politicallyl correct'.
Posted by: ludar | Nov 6, 2006 8:00:07 PM
We should make a big crater in the Arab Countries and stop all this neverending fanatic culture.
Posted by: John | Nov 6, 2006 10:16:46 PM
The Sunnis had a choice - join a democratic government or oppose it. It's time to make sure that they are no longer a threat to anyone ever again.
Posted by: John Kantor | Nov 7, 2006 2:13:23 AM
What happened to the B-52s? Why do soldiers and Marines have to crawl around in the gutter with the enemy when we can blast them to hell from the air? That is why Bush lost congress. That is why he deserved to lose.
Posted by: Joe rocker | Nov 8, 2006 11:17:15 AM
Regarding comments posted by Ludar on 11/6/06. I generally agree. US should have been much more dictatorial immediately after we ousted Saddam. We should have banned militias, banned all automatic weapons, explosives, etc. We should have demanded that once Iraq goverment was being established that the new goverment also ban all private militias. Any one found with explosives or explosive devices or automatic weapons would be considered traitors of Iraq. Only Iraq police, military, and security personel would be allow authority to have these weapons. US should have established a goverment for Iraq similar to our policy following WWII in Japan. Let Iraq develop for 10 years or so and then give them the right to make some changes as they see fit. It's probably too late now. We have given up too much control. The Iraqis have to learn to get along with each other or else the country will probably fragment like Yugoslavia did. Until Iraqis understand that outside islamic fundamentalist terrorist forces inside Iraq should be treated as enemies of their country they will not find any peace. The US has many reasons for being in Iraq, some for our own national interests, but of the reasons are truely to help the Iraqis. We should still be able show to the majority of the Iraqis public that our continued presence there is in the near future is to their benifit. If we cannot convince them of this we will not be successful and Iraq be a mess for decades.
Posted by: Jay | Nov 9, 2006 4:56:53 PM
Well its time now to make a final cut and use all our mighty force to reach the goal. Iraq oil should pay for our expenses and our lives. This islamic bastards have no right and we sould finish them all off, including surrounding neighbors. We are America and we should give a damn about others opinions. We do what has to be done and if it has to be dirty, let it be!
Posted by: Worldbnoss | Dec 29, 2006 11:17:38 AM
Post a comment
