BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Exclusive: Al Qaeda U.K. on the Prowl for Targets; Encouraged to Strike During the Holidays
December 22, 2006 12:13 PM
ABC News has learned that al Qaeda operatives in the greater London area are being encouraged to "strike during the Christian holidays," according to intelligence and law enforcement sources.
Those sources say that Internet chatter and Web postings monitored by authorities are behind the grave concern of an imminent al Qaeda strike, one that at least some law enforcement officials in Britain fear will again target mass transit.
Sir Ian Blair, the head of London's Metropolitan Police, summed up those concerns to the BBC Radio 4 Today program, "The threat of another terrorist attempt is ever present. Christmas is a period when that might happen. We have no specific intelligence to do [with] that.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
"It is a far graver threat in terms of civilians than either the Cold War or the Second World War. It's a much graver threat than that posed by Irish Republican terrorism," he added.
While there are no specifics to the concern -- no targets, no corroborated intelligence and no very specific timing -- authorities are taking the information more seriously than they otherwise might. Their concern stems from the knowledge that at least 1,200 al Qaeda operatives are at large in Great Britain, with about 18 key al Qaeda members among them and at least two highly placed linchpins to al Qaeda operations, who may have made Britain their home base.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
ABC News sources in North America and the U.K. say that British authorities are constantly on the run, breaking up plots on a near weekly basis that have reached the pre-operational phase.
Sources in Britain add that at least one "pivotal...al Qaeda U.K." operative has been detained during the past two weeks, and others may -- at least temporarily -- be in custody.
While authorities have seized some "precursor chemicals" during these raids, including acetone and hydrogen peroxide, as well as batteries, all of these are common household items would serve little purpose in court.
But that is not the purpose of the raids. The purpose is to break up plots before they can be executed.
ABC News has also exclusively learned, with chilling detail, from U.S. and British law enforcement sources that investigators from New Scotland Yard and the British domestic security service MI5 have put together physical evidence and a pattern of interlocking relationships between alleged terrorists that appear to establish a firm link among the subway and bus bombs that killed 52 Londoners on July 7, 2005, a failed set of bombings on July 21, 2005 and a plot to blow up between six and nine airliners, killing as many as 5,000 persons headed to the United States this summer, all the result of three years of planning by British al Qaeda.
Each cell appears to have had ties back to the same British citizen who controlled the plotters from Pakistan and whose identity was first reported by the ABC News Investigative Unit, sources said. That link plus forensic evidence and evidence of overlapping knowledge and personnel in each of the plots is more terrifying to authorities than the prior theory of independent cells operating without knowledge of each others' plans, sources said.
Intelligence sources also say it points to an organized group of cells working to cause carnage and damage to Britain's economy, apparently in an effort to wear down the public will to fight along side the United States in the War on Terror.
Physical evidence includes the use of batteries in more than one plot that cannot be purchased in the United Kingdom but only be purchased in Pakistan, sources say. In addition, a form of the powdered drink Tang most commonly available in Pakistan (although available in some U.K. specialty stores) was the organic material used to mix with peroxide in the bombs intended for the air bombing plot slated for last September to mark the fifth anniversary of 9/11.
Frightening details have also emerged that show how careful the planning was for the latest plot dubbed "Operation Overt," a plot interrupted by authorities at the 11th hour when they felt they had gathered much of the evidence needed to make charges stick.
Sources say the cell members had developed at least four separate methods of potentially delivering their lethal devices: sports drinks, baby bottles, cameras and possibly flashlights. They had also developed four-person teams to board each of the six to nine U.S.-bound commercial jets targeted, with each team member carrying a different apparently innocuous item aboard to maximize chances of avoiding discovery and to maximize the chance of blowing a plane out of the sky by successfully secreting multiple devices in the passenger compartment.
Although the terror suspects were homegrown, the plot itself exhibited none of the hastiness from plan to execution or the lack of professionalism in planning that are often the hallmarks of what are commonly called homegrown plots.
The plot was three years in the making. The chemistry, electronic and concealment skills of the bomb makers in the plot were excellent, intelligence analysts say.
Through it, British authorities came to see that al Qaeda Britain had emerged, and it had emerged as a lethal spin-off of the historical al Qaeda model developed by Osama Bin Laden. Although its ties to that original core of terrorists is largely inspirational, Al Qaeda Britain has the patience, membership and professionalism of its ancestor.
U.S. and U.K. intelligence sources say one of the formidable hurdles British investigators now face is the potential ease with which terrorists and their supporters can conceal their movements within a large, vibrant set of British Muslim communities. There are about two million Muslims in England, about 700,000 in London alone.
And because of a longstanding colonial and post-colonial history with pre-partitioned India and post-partitioned Pakistan, travel between England and Pakistan is substantial. Four hundred thousand British citizens and residents traveled to Pakistan last year, which, sources say, makes identifying a single member from one of 300 cells an enormous challenge.
Alexis Debat contributed to this report
December 22, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (36)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I live in England. I am English. I am white. I am not a Muslim. Yet with so called political correctness stopping true freedom of speech here i find i AM also a minority. Pathetic, but true. Go figure "to quote an American phrase".
Posted by: Phil | Dec 23, 2006 4:30:06 AM
PHIL,
We have a choice, freedom or security, but we cannot have both.
As long as there are differences men will always fight, its in our nature. It will all stop when there is "Nothing to die for"
Posted by: Rod | Dec 23, 2006 9:31:40 AM
get over it...
Posted by: Anita Beers | Dec 23, 2006 10:51:31 AM
I agree with the position above that political correctness is strangling western civilization. Muslim terrorists threaten our very existence and all we can think about is avoiding racial profiling and violating someone's civil rights. The U.S. & British governments are reduced to simply makings list upon list rather than attacking the problem - list of terrorist cells, probable members, known terrorists, flight risks, etc, etc, etc. We had better get serious about this war and stop the hand wringing or we'll all be speaking Arabic and living by Sharia muslim law.
Posted by: Don L. | Dec 23, 2006 11:04:07 AM
The most powerful tools the Jihadists are using against are our own laws and our fear of being anything other than politically correct.
They can do whatever they want, but when we want to secretly listen to potential terrorists calling into the US, the Dems cry foul, just to throw mud at GWB.
The Dems are literally taking the tools we have to find and track these nutcases out of our hands just so they can put Hillary in the White House in 2008.
Look at how happy Al Qaeda is to have the Dems win the mid-terms! And they have offered the Bleeding heart Libs the "opportunity" to negotiate.
Hmmm, maybe John Kerry should ask for Jacques Chirac's permission first, after all, he did say that he didn't want to step on the Europeans' toes, even if it means the end of the red white and blue.
Sick! I can't believe so many americans are falling for the Democrats' nonesense. Why don't those voters simply don suicide vests themselves and make life easy for the terrorists.
Posted by: Hal Monteith | Dec 23, 2006 11:12:41 AM
WHAT websites? WHAT internet chatter? Let's see it! How come all of these government warnings come from 'anonymous' sources, and 'web sites'. If people were TRULY posting these things on websites, the US government could easily find those people by simply confiscating the computers that the posts were made on. But of course, we don't see that happening. Because much of this is a charade.
Posted by: Eric | Dec 23, 2006 3:57:18 PM
Why are you suckers falling for this meaningless propaganda? These are the same scare tatics that were employed on the public in the year running up to the invasion of Iraq. A handful of people in the US and British governments convinced the entire world it was on the brink of destruction from Saddam Hussein. Of course all of that was manufactured nonsense, and we are now left with 1/2 TRILLION dollars spent and over 500,000 deaths in Iraq and nothing to show for it other than anarchy.
Posted by: Eric | Dec 23, 2006 3:59:37 PM
I'm British, white and middle-aged. So why was I targeted for "special treament" at Miami airport when I was flying back to London last month - dusted for explosives. all my hand luggage dusted for explosives, told to shut up sit down and not touch anything and generally treated as a criminal until the TSA security people found nothing untoward? My wife, who's Canadian, a French woman and a German man were also treated like me, while obvious Muslim-looking American passport holders went through normal security. All this followed being singled out for 'special treatment' at Atlanta and Newark on earlier flights that week.
Posted by: Russ | Dec 23, 2006 6:15:28 PM
Gee, didn't George Washington lead an offense against the British during Christmas?
Isn't that what an armed insurgency does?
Posted by: Zach | Dec 24, 2006 6:32:31 PM
Eric: "These are the same scare tatics that were employed on the public in the year running up to the invasion of Iraq."
Show us documented examples please.
You are making this up and you know it. If you can't make your case with facts, you simply have no case.
And: "If people were TRULY posting these things on websites, the US government could easily find those people by simply confiscating the computers that the posts were made on."
That is one of the most grindingly stupid statements I've read in some time. Did it ever dawn on one of your two active brain cells that the computers in question may not be in the US or the UK and so not readily reached by authorities from either nation?
Your posts seem an insipidly childish attempt at coercing people to 'think' like you.
Posted by: Praxis | Dec 24, 2006 7:17:03 PM
To all the Republicans screaming about how terrible the Dems are, and how liberals all want to roll over for the terrorists, wake up and smell the coffee. You've had eight years with control of the White House and Congress, and things have gone from bad to worse under your watch. Time for a new approach. And for all this talk about giving up our political correctness, what you're really advocating is giving up civil liberties, especially those of people that happen to be of the same ancestry of our enemies. We did that to Japanese Americans in WWII, putting them in internmint camps. No matter how big the threat from the Japanese was, can you really say that was justified or correct? By eroding our civil liberties and turning on our own citizens, we are giving the terrorists exactly what they want. We are destroying our own way of life. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." A famous quote from Benjamin Franklin that still holds true today.
The way to effectively fight this war, and yes, I acknowledge we are at war, is to focus our resources where they matter most, while doing everything we can to display to the world why our way of life is the best. Starting a war in a country that had neither weapons of mass destruction nor known links to terror (it was a completely secular regime) has created a new battle cry for militant muslims to rally behind. We have you Republicans to thank for that.
Posted by: Aaron B. | Dec 25, 2006 2:52:07 AM
Got an idea. Once the terrorists blow something up we can blame it on the Jews. That way, we won't totally blame the Muslims and incite more violence. *s*
Posted by: Boaz | Dec 25, 2006 1:15:42 PM
Just wanted to say that I agree totally with Aaron (above) and assume that Boaz's comment is thick with sarcasm. What a mess.
Posted by: Michael | Dec 26, 2006 3:47:35 PM
Wars are not won by winning hearts and minds, they are won bydestroying the enemies will to fight. WW II was the last war to be fought to a clear resolution. We nade it clear that we would only accept unconditional surrender from Germany and Japan.
"Shock and awe" obviously does not work.
Bottom Line: we have to take the gloves of and make it so costly for them that their continuing existance is in immenient jepoardy. very
Posted by: victor | Dec 26, 2006 6:01:11 PM
Uh,...so what happened?
That's right. Nothing.
But papers and chunks of TV advertising were bought and sold to run during the news hours and the specter of fear once again renewed.
Posted by: Zach | Jan 3, 2007 6:05:13 PM
please check out the video by Lebanese Christian Brigitte Gabrielle, very informative
Posted by: Johann | Jan 19, 2007 9:36:42 PM
Post a comment
