« Previous | Main | Next »

NYT Reporter: I Was Assaulted by Pakistani Agents

December 26, 2006 12:56 PM

New York Times correspondent Carlotta Gall tells ABC News she was assaulted by plain-clothed government security agents while reporting in Quetta, a Pakistani city near the Afghan frontier where NATO suspects the Taliban hides its shadow government.

Akhtar Soomro, a freelance Pakistani photographer working with Gall, was detained for five-and-a-half hours. According to Gall, the agents broke down the door to her hotel room, after she refused to let them enter, and began to seize her notebooks and laptop. When she tried to stop them, she says one of the men punched her twice in the face and head.

"I fell backwards onto a coffee table smashing the crockery," she recalled in a written account of the incident. "I have heavy bruising on my arms, on my temple and my cheekbone, and swelling on my left eye and a sprained knee."

Gall says the agents accused her and Soomro of trying to meet the Taliban. They identified themselves as working for Pakistan's Special Branch, an undercover police department, but Gall said other local reporters identified them as employees from one of the country's two powerful spy agencies: Inter-Services Intelligence or Military Intelligence.

The Committee to Protect Journalists ranked Pakistan the "third most dangerous" place in the world to work in 2006, after two journalists died in violent circumstances, and more than a dozen others were abducted or assaulted by state authorities.

In its annual report, Reporters without Borders complained that in Pakistan "investigative journalists are constantly targeted by military security services, which have no hesitation in harassing anyone they find troublesome." It was the first reported incident of Pakistani agents belting a female reporter.

Gall said the Minister of State for Information, Tariq Azeem Khan, apologized for the incident and helped secure the release of the photographer and Gall's belongings. But she says he told her to inform Pakistani authorities ahead of future visits to Quetta "to avoid such difficulties."

December 26, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (156)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Terrible story. Thank you for reporting it. But the telling of it needs some editing. When was Gall attacked? Was the "written account" published or an e-mail sent exclusively to ABC News? Why hasn't the NYT reported on this awful occurrence?

Posted by: Michael Roston | Dec 26, 2006 1:35:02 PM

Dan Pearl was not beheaded by Paki special agents. This NYT stringer should watch her neck. I wonder if the NYT is holding back on this for a reason we can only guess, such as the Eason Jordan rule?

Posted by: daveinboca | Dec 26, 2006 1:45:24 PM

"Investigative journalists" are becoming an endangered species. If they were, in fact, getting ready to meet with the Taliban they should have been arrested. Just stick to reporting the news instead of creating a news event. You might live longer.

Posted by: John Wilkins | Dec 26, 2006 1:48:35 PM

When will you liberals finally figure out that the Muslims want to kill you?

Posted by: XXX | Dec 26, 2006 1:48:55 PM

You're looking for real facts?
Good luck.

Posted by: genomega | Dec 26, 2006 1:51:59 PM

Pakistan is not a democracy..so this incident is nothing unusual.

Posted by: bobby mensa | Dec 26, 2006 1:55:36 PM

Reporters without borders, what a laugh. They are working on the assumption they are saving lives, this is a joke, right?
If this happened? then the individual was being punished for showing no respect. Makes me wonder about the "times," are they really a professional org? No> I don't think so, else the reporting would be conducted in a manner that would really point out the abuses through video, stills and sound recordings, along with the printed word.
Their arrogance as shown once again they live in a gilted world, they think they are operating with in the bounds of America or England! Stupid!
W E Stewart

Posted by: w e stewart | Dec 26, 2006 1:59:24 PM

Serves her right for trying to meet with a sworn enemy of America. When will the NYT finally admit their treason?

Posted by: John Burgeson | Dec 26, 2006 2:05:49 PM

Pakistan is the root of all evils, Mushraff seems to think he is in control! How long? We shall see! We ignore Pakistan at our own peril.

Killing and Assaulting reporters is nothing new here. The influence of Al-Queada and Taliban pemeates all branches of governement including foreign embassys.

They are bluffing us - hook, line and sinker. Creating uncertainity in Pakistan is vital; engineering the assassination of Mushraff will shakeout lots of lose ends. At least it will give us an option to watch them spill their guts. The enemies of Pakistan are also its neighbors, very little they can do at this point.

Posted by: Navin | Dec 26, 2006 2:06:08 PM

Glad to hear the Pakistani secret police are doing their jobs in silencing the Taliban and Al Queda propoganda arm AKA New York Times. Nice job guys, keep up the good work. Crack some more skulls at the NYT.

Posted by: Tim Mills | Dec 26, 2006 2:22:00 PM

A New York Times reporter trying covertly to meet the Taliban? After everything else the Times has been doing lately, why is this absolutely NO surprise?

Posted by: Bill Maher | Dec 26, 2006 2:23:26 PM

Doesn't Al-queda realize that the Al Jazeera Times is on their side? they should be throwing a party in her honor, not hurting her.

The NYT supports the destruction of the USA, what gives?

Posted by: Kris K | Dec 26, 2006 2:26:58 PM

Sounds like she failed to obey a police officer to me, maybe she shouldn't have been punched in the face, but if the police were to ever knock on my door, I'd open it, and even if I didn't, I wouldn't try grabbing my laptop back from them once they stormed the room. The word 'assaulted' is too strong in the headline, something about a victim of excessive force is more appropriate.

Posted by: m. alexis | Dec 26, 2006 2:30:24 PM

Have these idiotic women ever heard of Daniel Pearl?

We ain't in Kansas no more.

Posted by: Balbir Singh | Dec 26, 2006 2:37:14 PM

I think it's wonderful that the NYT provides a voice for our enemies. What greater mark of a true reporter can their be than to help kill Americans in order to sell a newspaper. I didn't realize that freedom of the press covered treason.

Posted by: Kris | Dec 26, 2006 2:37:23 PM

You conservative nutjobs have no clue about what the role of the media is.

I guess they should just sit back and be spoonfed whatever the government wants us to know. Then everything would be great. There wouldn't be any more casualties in Iraq. Afghanistan would no doubt be at peace, and Pakistan would be loyal American allies if only the media would just quit writing stories to the contrary.

The New York Times should be applauded for having the intestinal fortitude to try to go beyond the government-issued pablum and find the truth.

Of course, the conservatives don't believe in talking to anyone they disagree with. It short-circuits their little brains to encounter a differing point of view.

Posted by: Vedette | Dec 26, 2006 2:43:54 PM

NYT has done nothing to help our troops. I am all for free press; but if the NYT undermined our effort in WWII like they have in Iraq, our troops would have had much more significant morale problems. The NYT starts out with a left wing agenda and works backword. No sadness for NYT reporters.

Posted by: mike | Dec 26, 2006 2:48:16 PM

Try this: Stay the hell out of the war zones and you wont get hurt. Often reporters believe they are doing good things but are just following up on their own ideals and trying to support their own agenda. there is a massive anti american world growing. Think: Why is this so? So many people leave their own countries to go seek a better life, and find that better life in America. I have traveled most of the world adn find this to be true: Outside of Spain, Germany, England, and Canada, and Australia, Japan and New Zealand I also do not wish to leave out the Nordic countries, where would anyone really want to live? Government problems, corruption, religious oppression, poverty, closed mindedness?
Look before it is too late. Hitler would have owned Europe if it werent for america. the middle east is a dangerous place-if you go there, you take your chances. Do not expect your government to save you...you deserve what you get. One side thought, doesnt it seem a bit odd that the world is being drawn into a total conflict where Muslims are the bad guys and Everyone else is the good guy? With all of our technology, we could feed everyone, and have schools and peace but soemone is adding gas to the fire...why is that?

Posted by: JF | Dec 26, 2006 2:49:31 PM

New York Times! Pity

Posted by: Dakota | Dec 26, 2006 2:50:51 PM

Liberalism is a mental disorder. The New York Times and the Anti-American culture they've developed within their shameful organization is proof. They are NOT on our side. I believe they are traitors hiding behind our sacred Constitution.

Posted by: B. Smith | Dec 26, 2006 2:53:17 PM

Post a comment