« Previous | Main | Next »

NRC: Nuke Plants Don't Have to Protect for 9/ll-Style Plane Attack

January 29, 2007 1:16 PM

Perry_ohio_plant_nr Despite a recommendation from Congress, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) voted today not to upgrade security measures at the nation's nuclear power plants to protect against a 9/11-style attack from hijacked aircrafts.

The NRC ruled today that while the threat of an attack by air is real, it is not the NRC's responsibility to protect the plants. The commission said that military weapons would be required in order to protect the plants, and thus "the airborne threat is one that is beyond what a private security force can reasonably be expected to defend against."

Instead, the NRC voted to continue working on "mitigative measures" requiring plants to enforce measures to limit any radioactive spread and other effects in the event of an air attack.

Captured al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, as described in the 9/11 Commission Report, had grandiose plans to attack nuclear power plants with hijacked airplanes.

Based on this threat, Congress directed the NRC in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to upgrade security regulations and to take into account numerous factors, including a 9/11-style attack and attacks by large groups or aircrafts.

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

Last week, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, wrote to NRC Chairman Dale Klein, saying the NRC "must ensure that the security of nuclear plants is enhanced" to be consistent with post-9/11 threats. Boxer said today, "I am reviewing the final rule in detail and will be prepared to hold the NRC's feet to the fire to ensure that our communities are adequately protected."

Nuclear watchdog groups agree.

"Rather than upgrading protections, the proposed rule merely codifies the status quo, reaffirming the existing, woefully inadequate security measures already in place at the nation's reactors," said Daniel Hirsch, president of the Committee to Bridge the Gap.

The chairman of the NRC said today that this rule is only one in a series of actions aimed at increasing security.

"This rule is an important piece, but only one piece, of a broader effort to enhance nuclear power plant security," said NRC Chairman Dale Klein. "Overall, we are taking a multi-faceted approach to security enhancements in this post-9/11 threat environment and looking at how best to secure existing nuclear power plants and how to incorporate security enhancements into design features of new reactors that may be built in coming years."

January 29, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (5)

User Comments

We can never fence our enemies out. That is why anyone who threatens harm to us must be hunted down and killed.

Posted by: Walter E. Wallis | Jan 29, 2007 2:37:05 PM

We need more diversity. We must be tolerant of the opinions of others, that may differ from our own.

Posted by: SUV.Driving.Lib | Jan 29, 2007 3:46:13 PM

I agree with NRC, putting up surface-to-air missles is not something that anyone wants private companies doing, seeing as how most nuclear power plants are run privately. I do agree though that they must put into affact measures to prevent the spread of nuclear waste should a plane hit the side of a plant.

Posted by: Robert | Jan 30, 2007 2:13:28 PM

We are spending hundreds of billions in a losing war in Iraq, yet this administration is not protecting our nuclear power plants from a 9-11 style attack? We want answers and they better be good ones.

Posted by: larry | Jan 30, 2007 2:15:31 PM

Attacking a nuclear plant with an aircraft would be unlikely to penetrate the 7 feet on concrete and 2 inches on steel protecting the reactor.

Not to mention that the cooling towers (which are the only easy target to fly a plane into) are not where the reactors are.

If terrorists want to fly a plane into a power plant, they'd have better luck with a gas power plant. Think one giant fireball.

Posted by: TomSwift | Jan 30, 2007 10:25:50 PM

Post a comment