BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
U.S. Designates Iranian Bank As Weapons Proliferator
January 09, 2007 6:09 PM
The Treasury Department today designated Bank Sepah, Iran's fifth largest state-owned bank, a "supporter of WMD proliferation."
The move is aimed at crippling Iran's ability to finance its illicit weapons programs and to hamper its cooperation with North Korea's main missile exporter.
"Sepah provides direct and extensive financial services to Iranian entities responsible for developing missiles capable of carrying weapons of mass destruction," Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Stuart Levy told reporters.
The designation prohibits all U.S. citizens and entities, such as other banks and financial institutions, from dealing with Bank Sepah. According to Levy, any of the bank's assets under U.S. jurisdiction will also be frozen.
The U.S. is also pushing European allies to put pressure on Iran's banks. Most of the transactions at issue took place in Sepah's Rome branch, Levy added.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
This action was taken pursuant to a June 2005 Executive Order and is in accordance with the United States' obligations under the recent U.N. sanctions resolution against Iran for its non-compliance in halting its WMD and missile programs. That resolution requires countries to block entities involved in Iran's nuclear and missile programs as well as entities that support those groups, under which Bank Sepah allegedly falls.
This is the second Iranian state-owned bank to be designated by the United States in recent months. In September, the Treasury cut another large state-owned bank, Bank Saderat, from dealing with the U.S. financial system for allegedly financing terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas.
Levy would not say more designations were on the horizon, but he did not rule it out either.
According to Levy, Bank Sepah was a "key provider of financial services" to the Shahid Hemmat Industries Group (SHIG) and the Shahid Bakeri Industries Group (SBIG), two Iranian missile firms. Sepah also provided financial services to SHIG and SBIG's parent entity, Iran's Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO), "which has been designated as a proliferator of WMD by the United States for its role in overseeing all of Iran's missile industries," Levy said.
SHIG, SBIG and AIO's director are listed in the annex of U.N. resolution 1737 as entities directly involved with Iran's elicit weapons programs.
Bank Sepah has facilitated business between AIO and North Korea's missile exporter KOMID, the Treasury Department said. "The financial relationship between Iran and North Korea, as represented by the business handled by Bank Sepah, is of great concern to the United States," Levy said.
Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, remained defiant in the face of today's announcement. "This is not the first time that such measures of America take place, and the bank harassments of America have happened in some cases, however these are not issues that can affect Iran's will," he told Iran's Student News Agency ISNA.
January 9, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (5)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I knew something was fishy about that Bank ... instead of offering me a free toaster to open an account, they gave me a few spent uranium rods.
Posted by: K. Bob Koobideh | Jan 9, 2007 6:35:49 PM
The U.S has long been a weapons proliferator, be honest! What about these new nukes the U.S. government wants. What about our providing tech. to India. Who else, Chechnya? Japan! South Korea! on and on. I wonder how much of our annual dollar intake is from weapons sales?
Posted by: Marra | Jan 9, 2007 11:43:56 PM
ZOMG - an SUV driving lib who's upset we gave some weapons to South Korea and Japan? Two Democratic states that are on OUR side?
When Bill Clinton gave MISSILE & NUCLEAR and INFORMATION technology to the NORTH Koreans (Communist) and China (Communist), these SUV driving libs have absolutely no problem.
Pretty funny how some people have such selective memories.
So you are offended that we gave weapons to democratic states, but you are just fine with giving other technologies to communist states?
What's that make you?
Posted by: JelloB | Jan 10, 2007 2:23:59 PM
I have a problem when US nuclear policy is completely incoherent.
IRAN: Not allowed to develop nuclear power generation of their own, in spite of being signatories to the NNPT
INDIA: Given nuclear technologies and support despite not signing the NNPT
ISRAEL: Given incredible amounts of aid and military hardware while denying they have any nuclear weapons and not signing the NNPT, and having gained nuclear weapons through espionage in the US.
NEW ZEALAND: Treated like a pariah for excluding nuclear armed ships from their ports, while the US refuses to say if their ships carry nuclear weapons, thus meaning no USN ships may visit.
When people say something incoherent, is it worth listening to?
Posted by: runningdog | Jan 12, 2007 8:27:06 PM
Okay...there seems to be a little bit of a confusion here when comparisons are made in this way without putting things into perspective.
First, a key to the above puzzle, China, was inadvertently left out of the equation.
A major dagger that the old USSR drove into United States' back long before it collapsed was the transfer of nuclear technology to China. The United States knew of this but didn't make a big deal out of it publicly, because you just don't come out of the blue and pin yourself against one third of the world's population because you don't like their friendship. However, the United States and the United Kingdom, drove their own dagger into the backs of the Russians and the Chinese by looking the other way and helping the feldgling Indian weapons program to develop its nuclear arsenal.
Then, the Chinese got involved on their own terms and let loose of some of their nuclear know how to slip into the hands of the Pakistanian military. The Pakistanian nuclear capability has long and falsely been blamed on a single Pakistani scientist. This is rather an impossible claim, since it took 100,000 scientists from all over the world and working a few years as part of the Manhattan project before the U.S. was able to develop its first nuclear bomb.
Posted by: Jonathan | Jan 19, 2007 4:00:30 PM
Post a comment
