BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
Blackwater Scrutinized in Congressional Hearing
February 07, 2007 5:54 PM
Incompetence, cutting corners, over billing and cover-up were the themes today as the families of the four contractors killed in a ghastly 2004 ambush in Fallujah finally got someone's attention in Washington.
Now three years after those gruesome killings, the families of the dead men say the company they worked for, Blackwater USA, has tried to cover-up what led to the tragedy.
"Like everybody, I would also like the truth and the simple question of why? Why couldn't you give him the protection and the tools he needed to complete his mission?" Kristal Batalona, the daughter of one of the murdered contractors, asked in her testimony before the congressional committee.
It turns out the men, all having served in the military, got lost as they escorted a convoy of trucks carrying kitchen equipment.
The families told Congress they have discovered their men were sent out by Blackwater in unarmored cars, without automatic weapons, no maps and no tail-gunner to provide back-up as had been promised.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
"They just let him out there to die; they did not provide anything for him," said Donna Zovko, the mother of one of the murdered contractors.
Committee Chairman Henry Waxman read Blackwater's lawyer a company e-mail, in which the company's operations chief in Baghdad, the day before the ambush, complained about the lack of weapons, radios and armored vehicles.
"The e-mail ends, quote, 'Ground truth is appalling,' end quote," Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., read. "Were your forces sent on missions in used Suburbans rather than hardened vehicles as the e-mail describes?"
"Yes, our forces did go on missions; some of which were in soft-skinned vehicles," answered Andrew G. Howell, general counsel for Blackwater USA.
Blackwater is one of the many private companies that have made huge profits providing bodyguards for top officials, security and other services in Iraq -- what some call the subcontracting of the war, with very limited government oversight.
"It's like a secret army over there that the majority of Americans aren't aware of," testified Katie Helvenston-Wettengel, the mother of one of the murdered contractors. "But if you are going to subcontract out this war, then there needs to be some laws that apply to these people.
The families are now suing Blackwater, which is countersuing, saying the men all knew the risks when they signed on to go to Iraq.
The testimony today showed that while the men were paid almost $500 per day, the system of contractors and subcontractors meant the government ended up paying almost twice that for each Blackwater employee.
February 7, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (3)
This is what is wrong with the Iraq war. The US government is pouring in billions of our tax dollars into a war that has no end to it. Contractor like Blackwater do not want the war to end. If the war ended they would not exist anymore. Of course they only care about profit and they dont care about human lifes. The bottom line is that we are wasting Billions of dollars in a war that we can not win. Billions that can be spend here in the USA on the poor. Instead those Billions are going into Corporate like Blackwater.
Posted by: Carr | Feb 8, 2007 2:19:54 PM
Carr, I think you're wrong about "if the war ended [Blackwater] would not exist. On the contrary, there being a lot of rich people in the world, such security forces will continue to have a multitude of job opportunities protecting the rich and powerful who will more and more move into gated communites, walled-in compounds, and other "secure" dwellings.
If you want a sure career in the future, either become very rich, or get into the military or some for of security to make money protecting the rich. The rest of us middle-class and low-class people can go suck an egg.
Posted by: Robin | Feb 8, 2007 5:06:31 PM
a defense such as...
saying the men all knew the risks when they signed on to go to Iraq.
does not justify not justify...
unarmored cars, without automatic weapons, no maps and no tail-gunner to provide back-up as had been promised
Posted by: security | Mar 8, 2007 4:14:05 AM
Post a comment
