BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Critics: Dems' Money Madness Would Boost Lobbyist Power
February 16, 2007 1:17 PM
Watchdogs worry that increased fundraising pressures on Democratic lawmakers could make them more beholden to lobbyists and other special interests.
Charged with protecting and expanding the new Democratic majority in the House of Representatives, the lawmakers' umbrella campaign organization is mulling a boost in dues paid by its members of roughly $50,000, a spokeswoman confirmed to ABC News Friday.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) already requires most Democratic lawmakers to contribute between $50,000 and $600,000 a cycle, depending on their rank and power. The organization supports Democratic House campaigns around the country. Last year, the group raised about $33 million from its members, according to "The New York Times."
"These members will be that much more tied down by the money chase -- taking time away from the job they were sent here to do," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group, the Center for Responsive Politics.
Fred Wertheimer of Democracy 21, another good-government group in the nation's capital, called the possible move "yet another example of the never-ending arms race for political money in Washington."
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
DCCC spokeswoman Jennifer Crider stressed that the decision had not yet been made. "Dues for this cycle have not been finalized," she told ABC News.
The problem is simple, CRP's Krumholz explained: more pressure on lawmakers to raise money means they're more likely to depend on big donors -- lobbyists and other interested fundraisers -- to get them the cash. "The more the system relies on tapping big donors, those donors will hold more cards in their hand and wield more influence in Washington. That is without a doubt the case," she said.
According to "The Hill" newspaper, which first reported the possible dues increase, it's not just an effort to squeeze some extra money out of members but to shake loose money from lawmakers sitting on million-dollar war chests. A few members have plenty of cash and simply aren't paying up, the paper reported.
The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) -- the House GOP companion to the Dems' DCCC -- operates similarly, collecting dues from Republicans to support itself and GOP candidates around the country. The group did not immediately respond to request for comment.
February 16, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (4)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!
Posted by: skidog | Feb 16, 2007 1:47:15 PM
doing the 'moveon' dance......
how do we side-step them?
Posted by: Christine | Feb 16, 2007 8:24:47 PM
Every time the subject of campaign finance comes up congress shows it has no interest in changing the way things are done now. Therefore it is always going to be the richest people who run and are elected and are beholden to big donors. How did this country get so screwed up. Big changes need to take place. Hopefully the Democrats can do what the republicans sure can't do and won't do.
Posted by: Vicki | Feb 19, 2007 9:29:21 PM
There is only one way short of anarchy to correct this situation. The middle class must get up off their duffs and not only vote for but more importantly contribute to candidates who support real solutions to our dependence on imported oil and runaway healthcare/retirement costs. For as little as $2 a month, they can overwhelm the special interests once and for all.
Posted by: Robert Goldschmidt | Feb 20, 2007 1:50:20 PM
Post a comment
