BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Early Findings Link Key Teflon Chemical to Lower Birth Weight
February 23, 2007 9:59 AM
A key chemical used in the manufacture of hundreds of consumer items appears to be linked to lower birth weights in newborn babies, according to the preliminary findings of a study at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The study, which is still underway, sampled the blood of 300 newborns and looked at their levels of exposure to PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic Acid) and other fluorinated chemicals in relation to their birth weight, head circumference and other developmental markers.
PFOA, otherwise known as C8, is used to make the popular nonstick cookware coating, Teflon. PFOA is also used in the making of the protective coating that prevents grease stains on French fry boxes, popcorn boxes, candy bar wrappers as well as stains from hundreds of other food items.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Ninety-five percent of Americans, including children, have C8 in their blood, and the government is trying to figure out how the chemical got there and the risks associated with it.
Dr. Lynn Goldman, one of the scientists running the Johns Hopkins independent study, said her team wanted to study the health effects of low levels of C8 exposure.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
"It appears that there is a relation between a higher level of exposure and lower birth weight, as well as the circumference of the head," she said. Goldman described the decreases as "very small."
While the results are preliminary, if confirmed they could have a major impact on numerous legal battles as well as possible federal regulation of the chemical.
Residents near DuPont's West Virginia plant, where Teflon is made, are suing DuPont, arguing their drinking water has been polluted by C8. DuPont has already paid more than $100 million to settle lawsuits brought by residents.
In an agreement between the government and DuPont reached last year, DuPont voluntarily agreed to virtually eliminate any emissions of C8 by 2010.
A government advisory panel classified C8 as a "likely carcinogen," and previous studies have indicated that it can cause developmental and other adverse effects in laboratory animals, according to the EPA.
Yet C8 is not currently regulated under federal environmental laws while the EPA continues to conduct research on the chemical.
DuPont has long denied there is any danger presented by C8, and this study does not change their position.
"Many chemicals were detected in the study's samples," said Dr. Robert Rickard, Science Director at DuPont, "and it is important to note that the observations from the study were very small and well within normal ranges."
Goldman says that if her team's findings do stand up, a much larger study would be needed to determine whether the findings could be duplicated.
February 23, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (9)
It's in 95% of our blood? Why don't they ban that chemical? I'm sure they can find a replacement substance.
Posted by: Reason | Feb 23, 2007 4:03:59 PM
These corporations are slowly but surely destroying life on this planet to line their own pockets with money--what larger evil can there be???
Revoke the legal "person" status of corporations NOW!!!
Posted by: Lana | Feb 24, 2007 11:50:13 AM
Thank you for reporting and "blogging" this story..Now, will this be reported on ABC nightly news? Or will such important information be confined to the web?
Posted by: sir | Feb 25, 2007 7:45:33 AM
I have been informed that Dupont is the company that has successfully marketed dicumarol, an inexpensive rat poison, as an anti-clotting drug for people (Coumadin). Coumadin has been responsible for many strokes and severe, even fatal, hemorrhages in thousands of American patients. It does not surprise me that Dupont may be poisoning the public with Teflon. Teflon is used to make blood vessel grafts in humans, as well as other medically implanted devices.
Posted by: Milton Fried, MD | Feb 26, 2007 11:37:19 PM
Is this the same chemical used in carpet fiber to resist stains? What are other uses of this chemical? This may be the type of article needed to stimulate the desire of knowledge of chemicals that affect every life in this great country. We all must ask questions about chemicals that affect us.
Posted by: Lady | Feb 27, 2007 10:27:39 PM
This is a VERY important story. ABC must report this on the nightly news and not just on the web!
Posted by: Mele | Mar 6, 2007 1:18:58 PM
Yes, this is the same company who gave us StainMaster carpets, etc. These PFCs (perfluorochemicals) are in Scotchgard, Gore-Tex, Teflon, and anything that says it repels water, dirt or stains. Even certain paper plates and waxed dental floss are lined with this stuff.
I also agree that ABC must report this on the morning and/or evening news. Maybe advising the public to use Crisco shortening as a moisturizer truly IS more important. (Yes, this really was part of a health segment)
Posted by: Susan | Mar 14, 2007 1:14:07 PM
Fluorine in organic [molecules with carbon] or inorganic compounds is a bad idea.
I have spent the better part of a year trying to eliminate this ubiquitous element from my diet and my surroundings. I have been rewarded. I no longer need thyroid hormones and I am symptom-free.
According to the 2006 NRC report on fluorides, this element has a high potential to harm teeth, bones, all the endocrine organs [ovaries, testes, thyroid, pituitary, kidney, pancreas]at doses currently ingested in North America. T
Posted by: CC | Mar 20, 2007 2:57:55 PM
"Goldman says that if her team's findings do stand up, a much larger study would be needed to determine whether the findings could be duplicated."
Posted by: Zsolt | Mar 25, 2007 3:12:30 PM
Post a comment
