« Previous | Main | Next »

Iranian-Made IEDs Are the Most Deadly U.S. Forces Have Seen, and Their Use Is on the Rise

February 12, 2007 10:00 AM

Ht_iraq_ross3_060306_nr The most deadly improvised explosive devices being used against U.S. soldiers in Iraq continue to come from Iran, and Iran continues to provide more tactical training, according to explosive experts working with the U.S. military.

The Iranian-made devices are known as EFPs, or Explosively Formed Projectiles. When exploded, the copper disc center becomes a molten liquid bullet that can penetrate the thickest armor the United States has.

Earlier this month, CIA Director General Michael Hayden told the Senate Select Intelligence Committee that the EFPs from Iran cause more casualties on an incident-for-incident basis than any other type of improvised explosive device.

"EFPs are coming from Iran. They are being used against our forces," said Hayden. "They are capable of defeating some of our heaviest armor."

ABC News first reported on the use of EFPs last March when U.S. officials told ABC News that they discovered the link to Iran via tell-tale manufacturing signatures -- certain types of machine-shop welds and material indicating they are built by the same bomb factory.

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

"I think the evidence is strong that the Iranian government is making these IEDs, and the Iranian government is sending them across the border and they are killing U.S. troops once they get there," says Richard Clarke, former White House counterterrorism chief and an ABC News consultant.

U.S. intelligence officials say Iran is using the bombs as a way to drive up U.S. casualties in Iraq without provoking a direct confrontation, but a looming question remains. According to CIA Director Hayden and others, most of the EFPs are provided to the Shia militias, while it is the Sunnis who are responsible for many more U.S. deaths. Officials are now asking, could Iran be arming both sides of the sectarian violence?

Either way, Clarke says the evidence is clear that the Iranians know they are causing damage to the U.S.

"I think it's very hard to escape the conclusion that, in all probability, the Iranian government is knowingly killing U.S. troops," said Clarke.

Iran has denied supplying weapons to fighters in Iraq saying the country only has political and religious ties to Iraq's Shiites.

Today U.S. officials said the presentation of evidence against Iran by U.S. military officials in Iraq would be delayed until next week or possible the week after due to concerns over revealing sensitive intelligence.

Some of that evidence, according to U.S. military officials, includes Iranian-made weapons seized in Iraq with manufacturing dates as recent as 2006, suggesting brand-new weapons are going directly from Iranian factories to militias fighting U.S. troops in Iraq. The U.S. has also seized documents that allegedly prove Iranian intelligence is arming and training Shia militias.

The delay comes after a very strong warning to Iran from the U.S. Secretary of Defense late last week.

"We're not simply going to stand by and let people bring sophisticated IEDs into the country that can disable an Abrams tank, and give them a free pass," said Gates.

ABC News' Jonathan Karl contributed to this report.

February 12, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (139)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I dunno spunky. "Taking" a city would thrill the terrorists.

I doubt you can terrorize the terrorists into submission, Israel has not had good luck doing that.

Posted by: mark | Jan 30, 2007 4:22:38 PM

I am seeing such ridiculous posts I am starting to think I've landed in a nest of trolls.

"A missle to Tehran"?!

Wow.

The Iranians can knock out shipping in the Gulf with a minimal amount of weaponary.

I am astounded by this aggressive talk when we have LOST in Iraq, and Iran is 3x bigger and much more capable.

Don't forget we DID fight Iran thru an Iraq Proxy, and lil' old Iran fought Iraq to a standstill even with all our help.

Wise up people.

Posted by: mark | Jan 30, 2007 4:29:19 PM

Can we all just agree that the USA is not "nuking" or "carpet bombing" Iranian cities O.K. This isn't 8th grade lunch room where you think the USA can simply flex and countries will feign in fright. This is reality where our generals and mighty military are being routed, humiliated, and beaten by pseudo-militias and crazed terrorists and simple improvised explosive devices and car bombs.

Northen Ireland has taken over four decades to stabalize, Iraq will take four centuries. Getting into a war with Iran is not in the cards right now, the US has zero hand.

Posted by: Mike D | Jan 30, 2007 4:30:03 PM

So what exactly from this picture says this device was made in, or originated in Iran?? Anything at all? Or is this more Bush admin Intel?

Posted by: Mike | Jan 30, 2007 4:32:51 PM

Eric, I can tell that Oliver Stone movies appeal to you, but such conspiracy theory nonsense flies in the face of all good sense. Why would our military or our government "want" to get into another war, when we don't have the manpower to finish the ones we're in? Why would we set up conditions just to give ourselves an excuse to start another one? We don't NEED any excuses mister; if we want to go, we just go. Period.

As for those other things, you just don't get it do you. You're saying we knew IN ADVANCE that we would find nothing in Iraq, but went in anyway. Is that correct? Where is your evidence? Because by my recollection, we weren't sure WHAT we would find and we didn't really trust ANY of the info we had. In the American system of justice, if you make an accusation then the burden of proof is on you. So out with it.

Where, besides anti-government conspiracy blogs, is all this evidence that proves we already knew what Saddam did or didn't have? Keep in mind that if we DID know we would find nothing, we would also know that the truth would eventually come out, and people would know they had been duped. If that's the case, why was the inspection process we instituted once we were in there so open and public? If what you say is true, don't you think we would employ the same secrecy and stalling tactics that Saddam had used, to prevent the real facts about the WMD's from ever coming to light?

Posted by: Steve | Jan 30, 2007 4:38:23 PM

Yes, Iran needs to be punished! But Bush and his cronies have screwed us up - we are in the wrong war with our forces stretched too thin.

Couple of other points - these experts we have, didn't they say Iraq has WMD? Why should I believe them now?

We (the US) have provided arms and training to many nations/groups in the past that we were in agreement with. These arms have caused much damage and deaths to our opponents. What makes this different from what is happening now? We can do this these tactics while other countries cannot? Not sure I agree with this double-standard.

Should be - everybody out of other people's business. This includes the US out of Iraq!

Posted by: Rick | Jan 30, 2007 4:46:46 PM

All of you have the flaws that are making the U.S. degrade. You People: "No, I dont want to do this because this political party says or has done this wrong. I follow , whether they're both blind or controlling."

You people are all lemmings. Enjoy walking off that cliff arguing this party's views against the other party's views when you hit the ground.

Posted by: A Common Man | Jan 30, 2007 4:54:38 PM

I have no doubt that IRAN is behind the most recent devastating bombings against our troops. We had better put a stop to IRAN or we will pay a bigger price down the road. Personally I don't want to see the war on Terror fought on US soil. Hit the ones responsible.

Posted by: tab mccollum | Jan 30, 2007 4:57:15 PM

This is nothing more than Iraq done over again, for the ultra stupid.

This technology, for those who are ignorant, is decades old and has proliferated throughout the world. Insurgency groups worldwide have access to this form of simple formed projectiles. It was inadvertantly leaked long time ago by the brits to the IRA as part of a sting gone bad. IRA has shared it with their friends and they shared it with their friends...

If the administration can explain and demonstrate that these simple devices that can be made in any machine shop are made in Iran and are deliverd into Iraq with the knowledge of the Iranian government, then lets see it. The "trust me" bit has worn thin as of late.

My guess is they don't have any evidence and it is highly unlikely that Iran is arming Sunnis who are killing the Iranian backed Iraqi shia.

But don't worry. There is enough fools out there who will foam at the mouth and demand an immediate attack on Iran anyway. And reporters who can't really distinguish anything they are writing about will be part of that proccess.

Posted by: Dimitry | Jan 30, 2007 5:20:58 PM

Let's Leave NOW

Posted by: Bob McKinlay | Jan 30, 2007 5:26:46 PM

____________________
So how much did we spend to develop the armour of the Abrams? Now we find out that simple shaped charges (invented in the 1920s) can cut thru them like butter??
____________________

Umm, the M-1 Abrams tank design is 30 years old folks. They started to entered service in 1980 and were designed in the late 1970's.

The first weapons ever designed that were able to defeat the armor on the 30 year old beasts did not come into service until the late 1990's. The US suffered 0 losses in Gulf War I, but we saw the loss of several in Iraq.

These aren't 'simple shaped charges' that are being employed. These are sophisticated weapons utilizing the latest in explosive technologies to create a metal plasma that can burn through the top-secret Chobham amour system of an M-1. They can only be built by nation-states with sophisticated industrial capacity - such as Iran, the US, Russia, France, etc.

Posted by: Todd | Jan 30, 2007 5:30:46 PM

Iran has always been the target, Iraq was just a means to get there and a potential supply dump and staging site.
With Iran being the second largest oil producer in the middle east who but the largest, Saudi Arabia, has the most to gain by having that country invaded, occupied and dismantled a la Iraq in yet another war by proxy??
And c'mon, a little following the Bush money over the years will show you that the Saudis have gone to great lengths to buy not one, but two US presidents over the last few decades.
Is securing all the oil rights in the middle east and eliminating their one possible threat too much for them to ask for their hard spent investment?

Posted by: Zach | Jan 30, 2007 5:32:31 PM

It is surprising to see so many comments showing that the American people have learned nothing - nothing at all after four years in Iraq. The only sensible comment I saw was:

"How about we bring the troops out of Iraq so Iranian made IED's can't harm them? That's really the only way."
Posted by: Mike D

What are you blood thirsty people thinking?!

Posted by: RS | Jan 30, 2007 5:39:05 PM

As long as the World needs OIL the Middle East will be a mess.

Let's be serious about investing in new energy sources.

Posted by: Georges Pelpel | Jan 30, 2007 5:49:29 PM

You guys that want to drag Iran into this.... well... be forewarned...

1. You will inspire every extremist muslim to do more damage than in 9/11

2. You will turn a MODERATE Iranian people AGAINST US.. 65% of Iranians are unders 30 and are pro-west and are turning against their president,

3. Be prepared to unleash economic chaos into the world

4. Get ready to bring back the draft

U.S. Out of IRAQ NOW... This is abominable...
Nothing good can come out of an invasion built on a falsehood.

Posted by: hector | Jan 30, 2007 5:52:50 PM

From an American who does think his country is the best place to live, and in fact lives in the northeast, is college educated, and working on a masters...

We're talking about the underside of an Abrams tank, people. Considering that it was considered unstoppable for its entire service life up until now, and eviscerated the Iraqi armored forces twice in less than 15 years, I'd say it's been worth its weight in gold. We will adapt. Look at the Humvees now, some of them look like battleships on wheels.

Please...before you make simple and snide comments like:

"Why don't the war mongering idiots build Abrams tanks that can actually withstand shrapnel"

and

"So how much did we spend to develop the armour of the Abrams? Now we find out that simple shaped charges (invented in the 1920s) can cut thru them like butter??"

Do some research first, and think before talking (or typing, in this case).

Posted by: sfgavin | Jan 30, 2007 5:53:37 PM

Wow! Essentially we are talking about being a terrorist nation to stop another terrorist nation. Don't you think people in the middle-east think of us as terrorists? Does anyone wanna stop and think about what terrorism means?
Gandhi said: Violence begets violence
A gun in your hand doesn't mean you have to shoot it at everyone.

Posted by: anotherbrickinthewall | Jan 30, 2007 6:06:22 PM

Hey folks its about the money! So far 500 billion dollars. Do you think they (washington crowd) are going to let this war stop when they are making that kind of money. No way! If they can, they will expand the conflict into Iran so that they can make billions of dollars more! Only one thing will stop these leaches and that is to impeach Bush and then prosecute the rest of the gang of money vampires.

Posted by: Mike T | Jan 30, 2007 6:11:13 PM

copper will not go thru armor plate, that is BS, again, the media, trying to be experts on everything

Posted by: Tom | Jan 30, 2007 6:22:37 PM

Build a wall/land mine the Iraq/Iran border similar to how Israel built a wall accross Lebanon. INSTANTLY stopping the Terrorists from Homicide Bombing School Buses. Oh by the way last I recall didn't EVERY country beleive that IRAQ had WMD's not just the US yet the US is the ONLY country given a hard time for doing something about it? Iraq was a Secular country. Iran is not there is a difference. Last I heard Afghanistan's mullah's are living in caves in Pakistan not blowing up Hindu Ancient Antiquities so I think we are doing something. As for leaving Iraq why we have not reached the level of ONE battle in WW2 of casualties we ARE AT WAR not just fooling around. I would still rather have Marines in Iraq armed and ready for battle versus National Guard troops in LA and San Diego hoping they dont get killed by terrorists here.

Posted by: kalenakc | Jan 30, 2007 6:36:57 PM

Post a comment