BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Study: Bias by the Billions in Flawed Ed Program
February 23, 2007 11:16 AM
Top Education Department officials, including former Secretary Rod Paige, allowed specialists to improperly encourage state and local officials to spend billions of dollars in federal grant money with a small group of companies, government investigators have concluded.
In educating state and local officials about the department's Reading First grant program, officials loaded expert panels with speakers who overwhelmingly preferred products from a handful of educational companies, according to a report released yesterday by the Education Department's inspector general.
"It sounded like a sales job," one attendee complained in comments to the department which were reviewed by IG officials. "Why are certain approaches disregarded[?]" asked another. "We did not get the whole picture," wrote a third.
"Arrogant! You must think us stupid and uncaring," wrote another. "What else would explain how you talk down to us, preach to us, treat us like morons. I don't experience this level of a 'sell' job when I buy a car." The sessions, known as "the [Education] Secretary's Readership Language Academies," were largely controlled by senior Education Department officials, the investigators found.
The department is barred from interfering with curriculum decisions by state and local education officials.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
What's more, the department appointed certain advisors to help state and local officials make spending decisions with their grant money, despite the fact that they had financial ties to the companies whose products were under consideration by those officials, the report found.
Education Department officials failed to "adequately assess issues of bias and lack of objectivity," the report concluded.
In a written response to the report, Deputy Education Secretary Ray Simon said the department agreed that "there were areas for improvement," but was concerned that the report "did not recognize the positive aspects" of the educational panels and materials reviewed.
Reading First is a multi-billion-dollar grant program that was supposed to boost reading efforts for underachieving young students. It has been plagued with accusations of bias, improper political influence and fraud. The Education Department's inspector general has mounted six separate investigations into the matter, and lawmakers have called for hearings to look into the program.
February 23, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (19)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
follow the NCLB money trail from the testing companies and publishers to dubya and friends campaign coffers.
Posted by: wowser | Feb 23, 2007 1:49:38 PM
Follow the money trail.
Leave no quid pro quo behind!
apep
Posted by: apep | Feb 23, 2007 1:50:47 PM
Another example of monetary rape by current administration. Where large money is concerned you will only do business with BushCo. And our kids suffer
Posted by: skyreader7 | Feb 23, 2007 2:27:56 PM
More of the same from the completly full spectrum corrupt Bush/Cheney Administration. Their boundless criminality continues to shock and awe. The Bush appointees throughout Government are wrecking havoc on their respective agencies and the functions that they are expected to accomplish. The example of FEMA during the Katrina disaster is what can be expected across the board from anything that Bushco has had a hand in. It is time to call for Impeachment of Both the President and Vice president.
Posted by: frodo | Feb 23, 2007 2:36:52 PM
This administration was largely elected on the basis of morality and competence. By any independent measure, they failed miserably on both counts. From Scooter Libby to Jack Abramof to Enron to Halliburton to the Iraq War, the combination of arrogance, corruption, and immoral actions shows them to be the hypocrites they really are.
Posted by: Dirik Lolkus | Feb 23, 2007 5:26:24 PM
the goverment in toto is completely out of controll just remember that there was over 1800 pork chops in the federal budget this year, it is time to get rid of the whole mess the partys are demopublicans meaning that they all are spoiled. Our nation is hurting over the massive debt that has been run up and our industry has mostly all left the American shores Remember nafta was signed by Bill Clinton the great democrat since then we have lost most of our industry.
Posted by: egrheaultjr | Feb 23, 2007 8:54:05 PM
Hopefully someday soon the people in this country will realize that the Libertarians are right - the only proper function of Government is to protect its citizens from external enemies (military) and internal criminals (police). For everything else, butt out.
Posted by: c. jensen | Feb 24, 2007 10:47:41 AM
I know a lot of educators and the companies that supply text books....they aren't Rightwingers....you are being ripped off by your own benevelent caring, compassionate, liberal democratic, education bureaucrats
Posted by: todd | Feb 24, 2007 2:50:36 PM
This administration was largely elected on the basis of morality and competence. By any independent measure, they failed miserably on both counts. From Scooter Libby to Jack Abramof to Enron to Halliburton to the Iraq War, the combination of arrogance, corruption, and immoral actions shows them to be the hypocrites they really are.
Frodo...you didn't toss the ring into the lava of Mt doom...didja?
Libby didn't do anything..that trial was a fraud, j Abramhoff had as many demos on the payroll as pubs....who's the hypocrites? don't critize the mote in our eyes while you have a log in yours.
Posted by: todd | Feb 24, 2007 3:00:34 PM
Pubs, dems and ind.s all cheat and steal! To the victors go the spoils.
If anybody exists in the US that doesn't know our government (state and federal) is 90% corrupt (the other 10% is too dumb to steal) they are smoking to much happy weed.
Just wait until National Health care sucks another 20 to 30 % of your wages into the giant federal crack pipe! When our very own 'FED-MED' rolls around, you less- than-affluent oldsters will learn a new word. 'Triage'.
Pity also the Canadians who rely on the States for the health care they can't get through their own broken 'free' system. They will have an even longer voyage down to Mexican doctors and hospitals where they will then find themselves behind an endless line of newly disenfranchised Yanks.
If I were an American MD I would learn Spanish and maybe French in preparation for my new work place; Mexico. Viva club FED-MED!
Posted by: Mike Casper | Feb 24, 2007 3:08:04 PM
Another good reason to shut down the Department of Education and get the federal government out of the education business. Most of what the feds do contributes nothing positive to education; all they do is to steal our money, throw it away on nonsense and force local officials to conform to counterproductive federal "guidelines".
If a local schoolboard pulled something like this, there would at least be an opportunity to throw them out and possibly jail some of them. With the feds there is no recourse.
Posted by: Gene Taglia | Feb 24, 2007 9:58:40 PM
There is recourse, trace the money connections, then arrest all whose names appear at the top. The underlings will no longer fear the "boss" we might hear more than a few whistles from those trying to reduce possible sentences for complicity. Bush is a citizen, subject to the same laws as the rest of us. When did any law changing this status ever get passed, and who passed it? Arrest them also for abuse of power. The revolution might yet be televised, think of the ad dollars...
Posted by: brian Batie | Feb 25, 2007 8:45:45 AM
Always fun to see the liberals blaim conservatives for their own malfeasance. Does anyone really think that when Bush came in he suddenly changed all of the DOE staff to his loyal right wing followers? Come on. The funny thing about bureacracy, it is always the same crooks ripping you off and wasting our money, no matter who is the president. The problem is government service is now a right and entitlement instead of an opportunity to help your country.
Posted by: JT | Feb 27, 2007 10:00:40 PM
Thanks for some intelligent comment JT, I hope that this will cause a little pause in the mindless parroting of the "hate Bush camp" to the story...the Education Dept is filled with Liberal mind sets just like the universities and teaching pool. It would behoove us all to analyze the genesis of the problem, the total context, and the current state so that non-naive analysis can take place and some chance for solutions can be hoped for. I seriously doubt that any of this has ever reached the higher levels of the administration. It would be very wise for those troubled by the stories facts and implications to figure out who in Congress has the purse strings for this matter and go after them for accountability and answers.
Posted by: Ger | Mar 1, 2007 7:17:27 PM
Please think the facts through on this story. There is a genesis, a context, and a current situation. The administration, whom many blame with mindless parroting of liberal "hate the president" blather, have not stopped to think this through. The purse strings, as always, belong to the Congress. It's called Federal Government and the Liberals have been growing it for a long time. This president hasn't controlled it nearly as much as hoped, but didn't start it or accept the money from many lobbyists and unions who are very liberal. So, wake up, be where you are, and look at the facts and we might get somewhere...You are right to be upset, but make sure that your energy is focused on the real culprits...please...
Posted by: Ger | Mar 1, 2007 7:25:16 PM
It is a shame that there would be any name calling and mud slinging on any matters having to do with our pitiful government. We need to take away their air time for sure. If they do come up with anything good. They should pass it on to the Commander & Chief, and let him go over it with his magic wand, and then pass it on to the public for their approval.
All the thinking has already been done and the results are out there for everyone to see.
The goal of government has always been to divide and conquer.
And they have succeeded . Look at the vote. Split right down the middle. They accomplished this by
taking over the public schools, and every other aspect of our lives.
And they have done it with the help of the news media. Who has taught
our kids the most? where do they learn this behavior even before we get a chance to teach them anything. We put them in front of the TV-Baby Sitter at a very young age ad they suck it in like a vacuum cleaner.
Yes, things are bad, and are going to get worse. We are doomed to our own ignorance. We are going down a path that goes no ware but down.
What good can come of it unless we
wake up and take back our kids.
Posted by: JS | Mar 2, 2007 11:00:17 AM
I was principal of a Reading First school during this time. There was a report by "reading experts" indentifying approaches that were "scientifically proven" to
"work" for teaching reading. The companies whose textbooks incorporaated the scientifically proven approaches the best and most completely were placed on a limited list that could be adopted by Reading First school. The people who put the qualified basal readers together were called in to train teachers.
Sounds good, but it lead to a "one size fits all" model of instruction where those students who didn't master on the first attempt were given the same approach, louder and slower and in smaller chunks.
Some say it's working. It's pretty analytical and I think it ignores the complexity for the young reader of putting the reading act all together.
I know some of the companies were pretty cut-throat about getting on the approved list, and deliberately undermined smaller companies who didn't have the resources to politic it. From where I stood, it didn't appear to be corruption per se by educators, but an attempt by educators to identify stuff that working or would work. Maybe I'm naive, but everyone was trying to get the best science going to break the ice with children whose reading skills seemed frozen in time.
Posted by: Al Clarke | Mar 5, 2007 8:15:09 PM
A federal agency publishes crooked data? ::gasp!:: To everyone who says Bush is the cause of this, you're partially right, but only because he's signed laws expanding the Federal bureaucracy's scope. I wish Reagan had made well on his promise to get rid of the DoEd - at least we wouldn't have NCLB, the likes of which would make even Josef Stalin blush. This is why I don't consider Bush a conservative: he plays authoritarian ball with regard to social issues and he plays left wing ball with regard to economic issues.
I recently had a discussion with an associate of mine about the state of American education. I argued that in fact the most decentralized models of education in the US have worked far better than the centrally-planned socialist systems we all grew up with. Surprisingly, one of the most successful school divisions in the country San Francisco, a system that is almost completely decentralized and based on school choice. I decided to quit debating with my associate when she made the unproven and untrue argument that education can't function in a capitalist system. This debate isn't about Bush vs. the world or other such nonsense, but about how much power the federal government has grown to have. I think the Framers would be rolling in their graves if they saw the size of the Federal government today.
Posted by: Andrew E. | Mar 6, 2007 5:27:51 PM
Ya know, it didn't take much to separate church from state and remove God from public education. Just how long is it going to take to separate Feds from Education?
Posted by: Holli | Aug 24, 2007 12:34:48 PM
Post a comment
