BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Terror Chowder: Stir in Boston
February 01, 2007 3:51 PM
In court Thursday, prosecutors calmly outlined why two young marketers were charged under a terror statute when they only intended to promote a cable TV cartoon, not "flip the bird" at the city.
"The broad intent was to draw attention to a new movie that was coming out. Guerrilla marketing, it is called," Assistant Attorney General John Grossman told the court.
"While that may have been the broad intent, it's clear that placing a bomblike device at that location would be to create fear, unrest, that there was a bomb located at that location," he continued.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
The courtroom calm was a far cry from the response to the ad campaign by Boston residents -- fear, concern, traffic tie-ups -- and the officials of Boston -- outrage, anger and an intent to prosecute.
Two questions were not asked in court yesterday but were the talk of many media observers, including our own.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Where but Boston could one make a national chowder of guerrilla ads, police responses, the use of the word "hoax" and the immediacy of cable TV?
And when but now could the world of Internet bloggers offer the early advice that the "suspicious" devices were part of a Cartoon Network ad campaign, even as the network's sister media outlet CNN was declaiming the fear that the apparent bomb hoax was causing in Boston?
Here is how events unfolded:
A first "device" was spotted at a subway by a passerby during the morning rush.
Transit police "disarmed" it, and then local and national news media reported it.
In the words of Assistant Attorney General Grossman, "What happened was a passerby notified an MBTA inspector that they noticed a device...The MBTA inspector noticed the wires and the duct tape-wrapped package and did the right thing and notified MBTA police."
Those cops decided the device looked like a bomb, and rather than take chances, they "disarmed" it with a controlled blast.
"This device looked like a bomb...there was a circuit board, running to a possible explosive material, wrapped to duct tape, with the appearance of C4 or something wrapped in duct tape. The power source could have been one battery and explosive, or even a watch battery. It had the appearance of an explosive with a wire coming out of it. It was very possibly a bomb," Grossman said.
But soon after, according to City of Boston police, bomb technicians knew they were dealing with a "prank," meaning a stunt of some kind, and not a "hoax," which to cops means a device intentionally made to look like a bomb.
Still the media and then the governor of Massachusetts said it was "a hoax," and before one could say "Osama bin Laden," fear was in the air in the commonwealth.
By 1:00 p.m., when callers alerted officials to four more "devices" on bridges, at a busy intersection and near a hospital, Boston officials were in high gear. State police bomb techs, FBI counterterrorism experts and political officials all were grappling with what they had. The judge and prosecutor calmly discussed this on Thursday:
"The device in question is a box, 18-by-18 inches, several inches thick. On the top portion, made from a LiteBrite toy, is a light that emits light. There is a cartoon-like figure making an obscene gesture facing outward. Colloquially, he is flipping the bird, your honor," Grossman said.
"That's what the finger is?" Judge Paul K. Leary asked.
"Exactly," Grossman answered.
Does that sound like the work of bomb hoaxers? Members of the federal law enforcement community by mid-afternoon Wednesday had reached the conclusion that it didn't and issued a bulletin stating the devices were possibly the work of "pranksters" or a publicity stunt to promote a movie.
This was roughly the time when Turner Broadcasting decided to fess up, and early enough for officials perhaps to be a bit more careful with their words in a late afternoon press conference, where anger was the mood, and "pranksters" were not on the agenda.
All in all, it was a frustrating day, law enforcement officials concede.
Police and firefighters forced to respond as if the devices were real -- they get no choice in these matters -- wound up tying up traffic and feeding the media hype when television broadcast images of the cops and firefighters at work.
Turner Broadcasting, for its part, did not come clean publicly until late in the day, which raised skeptical eyebrows given the commercial interests at stake.
By that point, police were well on their way to charging two young marketers: the men who appeared today in court, where it was noted by the prosecution that the two "pranksters" were not the instigators of the campaign.
"We're not unaware of the fact that the defendants are not at the top of the hierarchy here," Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General John Grossman told the court.
Arrested were Sean Stevens, 28, and Peter Berdovsky, 27, and charged with placing a hoax device and disorderly conduct. They were both released on a $2,500 bond each.
Before their arrests, the men spent Wednesday evening helping police locate the rest of the devices.
And, in a worlds-collide sequence, while one America was chasing potential bombs, the world of bloggers was already explaining the campaign to the Internet savvy.
As to why other cities did not react, or overreact like Boston, well, it appears most did not know the devices were in their cities until after Turner fessed up, and federal officials from Boston circulated a list of locations through intelligence channels.
February 1, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (53)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
What a joke- doesn't say much for the Boston intellect. Look out- it's .... a TRASH CAN!! Oh no!!! Call the Feds! Arrest the city! Call FoxNews! Fear, again, and again- with the media a willing accomplice. How tiresome.
Posted by: Michael Thompson | Feb 1, 2007 3:59:05 PM
You forgot about the idiot reactionary mayor threatening to sue Turner Broadcasting and having their FCC license pulled. What a spaz. IMHO, it was the Boston authorities who caused the hysteria, not the Lite Brite toy.
Posted by: nffcnnr | Feb 1, 2007 4:32:24 PM
Prior to this week, I had no idea what "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" was; NOW I DO. This is guerilla marketing and publicity taken to perfection. It epitomizes what American creative marketing is all about! Cartoon Network will enjoy a huge jump in website hits, and the show itself will be seen by multiples of its former viewing audience.
Back in the day, you'd get tickets and fines for postering a record label release or film all over the city, but it worked; now these guys have done the exact same thing, but with brite-lites!
WHO da man?!?!
Posted by: Jazz | Feb 1, 2007 5:26:28 PM
the only thing missing in Boston is a brain. The "government"has been watching too much tv. When a terror attack comes, they will not have a clue, singly or collectively.
Posted by: thomas fullman | Feb 1, 2007 5:57:48 PM
What happened to our sense of humor? Who's the idiot that thought those things looked like BOMBS anyways? Wish someone would put those in my hometown to lighten my mood when I drive around town. I have the stickers of those little guys on my truck, cuz it made me giggle when I saw them.
ps. I love adult swim shows and have been a fan since I was 13.
Posted by: Ninja | Feb 1, 2007 6:56:20 PM
In regards to the promotional advertising devices that were recently placed in/around the Boston area. With the security dollars the state has / is receiving from the federal government, following 9/11, these devices should have not been able to be put in place, this is an outrage. If we can not detect suspicious activity around our cities, how are we supposed to detect terrorists entering our state / and or country? These people are not terrorist, they are not trained to be terrorists as far as we know, and they are common people. I am just confused - I hear so much on the news about how airports are are stepping up security and how officials are trained to detect such suspicious activities, but yet two men put suspicious devices throughout the city. How could this be?
Are we not safe in our own homes?!!!! I feel an investigation is in order - where has the money for the post 9/11 training gone?
David & Monique - Southbridge, MA
Posted by: David & Monique Manna | Feb 1, 2007 7:24:22 PM
So if I buy a pack of batteries in Boston, and carry them around without a bag, that could be construed as an act of terrorism?
I'll just say something about this is very strange. CNN and Cartoon Network/Adult Swim are both owned by Turner, yet no one at CNN had any idea about something that's on their sister network? An no one from Adult Swim could walk (probably) down the hall and notify someone at CNN??
Something just doesn't add up.
Posted by: MiMatt | Feb 1, 2007 7:33:19 PM
Pathetic. I can see why the city of Boston and law enforcement officials are going after these guys.
They are trying to distract attention
away from the fact the police in Boston are a bunch of morons.
Anybody with half a brain could tell with one glance that this was a sign and not a bomb.
Just pathetic. Words cannot describe how ignorant Boston police look.
Posted by: Screaming Eagle | Feb 1, 2007 7:48:49 PM
A "bomb-like device???" Please.. Boston was just so EMBARASSED at their own STUPIDITY that they need someone to blame. Some people...
Posted by: Mitch | Feb 1, 2007 7:49:33 PM
The police and authorityies should be fired. These (devices) absolutely could not be a bomb. After the first one was taken down an idiot could tell it was not a bomb. Why did the police terrorize the city by making a terror plot out of a grade school technology toy?
Posted by: Dennis | Feb 1, 2007 7:52:34 PM
Well done Boston Police - you have helped the terrorists win... you are so clueless that you don't investigate (or Google even), you just run around like headless chickens and shut-down the entire transport system.
I'm not exactly up on "street art", but I just laughed when I saw the cop in a HAZMAT suit up a ladder investigating this 'device'... Thanks Boston Police for that comedy moment at least.
If I were a citizen of Boston I would be asking some serious questions about my safety - how are these clowns going to cope with a real terrorist incident?
I hope they don't hang those kids out of embarrasment at their own stupidity...
Posted by: Rob | Feb 1, 2007 8:04:47 PM
I don't even live in Boston or the other cities, but no one over reacted. In today's day in age jokes like this aren't funny. I hope these two and everyone else at Turner Broadcasting gets fined heavily and thrown in jail for a very long time. If it was true marketing they would have asked for permission to put these up and probably would have had to pay an advertising fee. I hope they all are severely punished.
Posted by: LX | Feb 1, 2007 8:05:55 PM
Did anyone see the last big prank pulled on the city of Boston? I think it was called the Big Dig. Just like this one, it was metaphorically flipping the city the bird.
Seriously, this should have been a concern for exactly 30 seconds.
Long live Master Shake.
Posted by: VelcroMonkey | Feb 1, 2007 8:11:55 PM
It shouldn't even be called a prank. They were just posting signs. It's either the police of the moron who called them who is to blame. Why didn't Philly or NYC or any of those other places melt down? What a bunch of idiots!
Posted by: Bob G | Feb 1, 2007 8:20:39 PM
Being a resident of Boston, I feel that Turner Broadcasting, the Public Relations Firm and the two "artists" should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State and Federal laws. What they did to Boston residents was beyond a "joke". Furthermore, those "artists" coming out of the court house today should have been ashamed and should have shown some sort remorse for what they put us through.
The "artists" should be fined heavily and do some jail time--that would take the smirks off their faces!
Posted by: Arnoi | Feb 1, 2007 8:37:16 PM
Why is it, that everybody nowadays is not only charged with the actual crime but also "disorderly conduct" too? Wouldn't it stand to reason if you committed any crime you were probably being "disorderly". It's like a bonus charge. These kids will probably be acquitted of the serious charge and get probation for the DC. I thought Boston is where all the brains were?
Posted by: boomindan | Feb 1, 2007 8:50:53 PM
So let me get this straight... most major corporations, in their pursuit of profits, are considered "evil" by many of those in the counter culture. But in this case, the corporation that ignores the fact that the nation is on terror alert (I know, I know, it's all fake, but hear me out) and designs a campaign to secretly put odd looking electronic boxes in the supports of bridges and major highways is DA MAN in their pursuit of profits. Do I have that right?
Posted by: Tracey | Feb 1, 2007 8:58:46 PM
I find this whole thing so comical. Many articles and news shows I have seen have been criticizing them for what seems like taking this as a joke. Well, this is a joke and an overreaction.
Posted by: Rach | Feb 1, 2007 9:28:37 PM
Dear Boston:
For future reference, neon signs are not bombs.
Signed,
The rest of the world
Posted by: Err | Feb 1, 2007 11:40:58 PM
Feminized Boston PD! How will the panic when a real threat is posed?
Posted by: Formerly from Boston | Feb 2, 2007 12:23:56 AM
Post a comment
