BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Exclusive: Report Charges Broad White House Efforts to Stifle Climate Research
March 27, 2007 12:13 PM
Bush administration officials throughout the government have engaged in White House-directed efforts to stifle, delay or dampen the release of climate change research that casts the White House or its policies in a bad light, says a new report that purports to be the most comprehensive assessment to date of the subject.
Researchers for the non-profit watchdog Government Accountability Project reviewed thousands of e-mails, memos and other documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests and from government whistle-blowers and conducted dozens of interviews with public affairs staff, scientists, reporters and others.
The group says it has identified hundreds of instances where White House-appointed officials interfered with government scientists' efforts to convey their research findings to the public, at the behest of top administration officials.
The report is slated to be released tomorrow at a hearing before the House Science Committee, which is investigating the issue.
"The evidence suggests that incidents of interference are often top-down reactions to science that has negative policy or public relations implications for the administration," the group says in its report.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Some of the alleged interference -- including restricting scientists' ability to talk with the press and Congress -- may have violated federal laws protecting their right to speak, the group concludes.
"Directives and signals" from White House offices, like the Council on Environmental Quality, the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Office of Management and Budget, are handed down to political appointees and politically-aligned civil servants through off-the-record conversations, the report says. Frequently, those giving the direction have little or no scientific background, according to the report.
The alleged interference took the form of "delaying, monitoring, screening, and denying interviews" between government scientists and media outlets, as well as delaying, denying or "inappropriate[ly] editing" press releases conveying scientific findings to the public.
Political appointees also suppressed, delayed and inappropriately edited reports produced by government scientists for Congress and the public, the Washington, D.C.-based group concluded.
In some cases, the policies and practices the group says were enacted to squelch damaging scientific information "constitute constitutional and statutory infringements of the federal climate science employees' free speech and whistle-blower rights," the report finds.
"Claims the administration interfered with science are false," Kristen Hellmer, spokeswoman for the White House Council on Environmental Quality, told ABC News. "We spend nearly $2 billion a year on climate science, which leads the world and speaks for itself."
Tarek Maassarani, the report's author, cautioned that he did not see evidence of a single coordinated White House effort to block credible climate research. Instead, he believed officials acted only when a piece of research or particular issue showed up on their political radar. "They're reacting to situations most of the time," Maassarani told ABC News.
The investigation covered the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Departments of Energy and Agriculture, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and elsewhere.
Evidence and allegations of political interference in government climate change research have dogged the Bush administration, even from fellow Republicans. Last November, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., charged the administration had broken the law by failing to deliver news of climate change research to Congress by a legally-mandated deadline of November 2004.
"When you get to that degree of obfuscation, then you get a little depressed," McCain said then.
House Science and Technology Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Brad Miller, D-N.C., said the report's findings were "alarming" but "confirm what we knew all along" and looked forward to learning more at tomorrow's hearing.
This post has been updated.
March 27, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (57)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I guess I will end my boycott of ABC. Investigative reporting!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I thought it was a thing of the past when they got rid of Dan Rather, and all the media is working so hard to imitate phoney Fox propaganda network.
L
Posted by: Linda Crawford | Mar 27, 2007 3:22:14 PM
Good job! Keep up the muckraking to maintain your credibility as journalists. As the DOJ situation unravels, it confirms that many of the WH staffers and political appointees at the various departments and agencies are planted political activists, educated at right wing fundamentalist colleges & institutions, with political and fundamentalist missions and hidden agendas.
Posted by: Horton | Mar 27, 2007 3:24:06 PM
Now that you nailed the Bush
propaganda effort see if your report gets on mainstream TV news
programs. It's bad enough that the
Bush Junta suppresses the facts
but it's even worse when the
corporate suits in the news divisions do the same instead of
exposing the facts.
Posted by: Mike | Mar 27, 2007 3:32:45 PM
Three words: "Impeachment and Removal."
Posted by: Terry | Mar 27, 2007 3:44:11 PM
ITS OBVIOUS WHY THE WHITE HOUSE WOULD REFUTE THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING, BECAUSE ITS THE BIG COMPANIES WHO ARE DOING THE MOST DAMAGE IN REGARDS TO THE GREEN HOUSE AFFECT THAT BUSH AND HIS ADMIN BUDDIES HAVE THE BIGGEST INVESTMENTS WITH. AND FOR THEM TO MAKE LAWS REDUCING THE GREEN HOUSE GAS EFFECTS FROM THE OIL INDUSTRY GM, OTHER DEALERSHIPS, THEY WOULD LOSE ! BUT WHO CARES THERE STINKING RICH I DONT SEE WHY THEY FEEL TO BE EVEN MORE GREEDIER, HELL WHAT GOOD IS IT TO HORDE ALL THE MONEY IN SWINDILLING WE THE PEOPLE WHEN THIER FUTURE GENERATION AND OURS WONT BE AROUND MUCH LONGER TO SHARE IN THE MILLIONS THEY RAISED, O AND ABC U STAY ON THE STORY WE NEEDED THAT
Posted by: TY | Mar 27, 2007 3:49:22 PM
ABC regurgitates the "non-profit" Government Accountability Project's report that "charges..." just in time for Dem hearings. Please.
Non-profit is one label the media trots out that is supposed to connote objective - yea right.
Posted by: edh | Mar 27, 2007 4:10:40 PM
Interesting headline and lead paragraph. "Bush administration officials.... have engaged in....".
Jump to paragraph twelve. Report's author says there is no evidence of a single coordinated effort to block credible climate science.
This is "good reporting"? Compared to what? It's a sensationalist, misleading headline that is negated by the report's author himself. What BS.
Then of course, most wouldn't get that far. Too many are headline sound byte educated.
Small wonder that Congress and the media enjoy less "approval" ratings that the President himself.
Posted by: MataHarley | Mar 27, 2007 4:26:45 PM
Just go ahead and say it ABC,
George Bush, Big Oil, Big Business, and Republicans -
Hate the Earth.
Posted by: JelloBiafra | Mar 27, 2007 4:55:45 PM
No civil servant has any business talking to the press except and unless they are requested by the public affairs office or the policy makers in that agency and they are expected to reiterate the policy of the agency. That's the way it is in the Bush administration, the Clinton administration and every administration before that. The fact that ABC apparently cannot understand simple direct procedures like this which have been going on for decades is a clear indication that they are a bunch of dingalings who don't know diddley squat.
In terms of climate research there are facts, conclusions and beliefs. No one has blocked out facts by researchers and the problem is with the conclusions, beliefs and political behavior. In short, the earth is heated by the sun and CO2 traps heat and every body agrees on that and the appearance is that storms on the sun change cloud behavior which traps more heat than the earth gives up and reduces rain fall. Some scientists like Hansen at NASA believe the additional heat is caused only by CO2 and Hansen is a born again democrat who has attempted to use his beliefs to skewer the administration politically.
Posted by: LGE | Mar 27, 2007 5:04:03 PM
Cheney had his way again: just like he Lied to get the U.S. into Iraq, he has used his administrative levers to Lie about global warming.
But just as he has suffered a major failure in Iraq, he has also been a complete failure on holding back the facts on global warming.
Despite all of his efforts, the world has moved ahead despite the Administration. Not only have these guys not stopped the action to limit global warming pollution, they have lost all of their input into forming the actual policy.
Posted by: oregonj | Mar 27, 2007 5:04:47 PM
Name one thing this administration HASN'T lied about!
Posted by: UncleSammy | Mar 27, 2007 5:25:25 PM
My favorite thing about the dupes and useful idiots of the Washington press corps is in there traditional role as conduits for press releases by kook fringe leftist groups like the Government Accountability Project. Mr. Rood merely calls said group a "non-profit watchdog." Hahahahahahaha.
Posted by: Tom | Mar 27, 2007 5:37:38 PM
I saw this story a year or so ago. At that time, the actual reports were presented demonstrating the real text and then the edited texts in the reports. It was obvious even then how the asministration was changing the text to reflect doubt in the data or inject contradiction to it outright. This is appalling, like re-writing Darwin's theory on evolution to inject "Creationist" thought. We must purge the government with a total "ignorance cleansing".
And folks, it is reported 45% of global warming greenhouse gases are created by America's autos-AMERICA's autos. Whos's driving those??? Get out and ride a bike or walk, or take transit. YOU are creating the greenhouse gases, not "big oil". It is Americans who chose to drive big cars, longer distances even after the warnings in 1974 with the Arab Oil embargo, remember that? Kill your TV, kill your car.
Posted by: JAG | Mar 27, 2007 5:51:36 PM
YOU HAVE TO WONDER WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE (ADMINISTRATION) WOULD PUT UNCONTROLLED GREED OVER SURVIVAL OF THE PLANET. THESE GUYS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CHRISTIANS. THEY ARE GODLESS, GREEDY BARBARIANS - IMMERSED IN IGNORANCE AND ABYSMAL SELFISHNESS. BUSH AND CHENEY'S GRANDCHILDREN WILL DETEST AND HATE THEM.
Posted by: Truth or Consequences | Mar 27, 2007 6:59:39 PM
Ho hum.
More innuendo.
Probably most of the suppressed reports deal with toxics and pollution in general -- not carbon based human caused global warming.
Goldman Sachs, the whole bunch, are financing this panic in order to push through carbon trading markets.
Posted by: Karl | Mar 27, 2007 7:05:48 PM
After reading all the comments posted, I have come to this conclusion. A lot of smart peiple have stated the obvious. Bush and his cromies get money from BIG OIL! Anyone who posted comments in favor of the BUSHIES, and, trying to debunk GLOBAL WARMING must be getting PAID OFF by the BUSHIES! I just follow the money!
Posted by: ChingarraSan | Mar 27, 2007 7:12:20 PM
This is one more item to be added to the record. From phone jamming, to the USA's firing everything can be tied together. Solution RICO investigations of the RNC.
Posted by: 1Watt | Mar 27, 2007 8:12:41 PM
1. Note: Justin Rood did not work for ABC at the start of the Iraq war.
2. "No civil servant has any business talking to the press except and unless they are requested by the public affairs office or the policy makers in that agency and they are expected to reiterate the policy of the agency."
Republican bull. There is only a gag order on these scientists to hide the truth from the American people. We paid for this information and it belongs to us. I guess next the faschistocapitalist will privatize knowledge itself.
Posted by: Michael D. Adams | Mar 27, 2007 10:16:52 PM
What exactly is a "radical environmentalist", spoken with the same scathing, hate-filled words I hear ad infinitem on the web, the cable shows, and some newspapers. I never hear anyone say, here are the reasons I disagree with liberals or environmentalists. I think they pick up the talking points which are slogans they can understand and rely on them for responses to any and all situations. We truly have become a nation that is so dumbed down we can be led by an idiot and just keep moving along behind the crowd.
Posted by: Elisabeth | Mar 27, 2007 10:24:02 PM
I hope to see reporting like this once the Dems take over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cough cough...
Posted by: Christine | Mar 27, 2007 10:27:26 PM
Post a comment
