House Passes Bill to Ban Cockfighting and Dogfighting

March 27, 2007 11:02 AM

Anna Schecter Reports:

Cockfighting2_nrIn a landslide vote yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a bipartisan bill strengthening the nation's laws against cockfighting and dogfighting.

The bill makes it a felony to transport fighting animals across state or international borders and outlaws the sale of cockfighting weapons.

One of the bill's co-sponsors, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., says he expects the president to sign the bill if it reaches him.

Animal rights activists say the bill will deter people from engaging in the cruel blood sport and that felony penalties match the crime of participating in the cruel blood sport.

"This bill brings us one big step closer to eradicating the dogfighting and cockfighting industries, and that goal cannot be achieved too soon," said Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States. 

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

The House was expected to vote on the animal fighting bill last Wednesday, but the bill was pulled from the calendar when the National Rifle Association and its allied lobbyists for the cockfighting industry raised objections about the bill, according to the HSUS.   

Yesterday, House members voted overwhelmingly in favor of the measure, by a margin of 368 to 39. 

Critics of the bill say it will only drive the cockfighting and dogfighting industries underground but will not cut down on the sport.

The bill now awaits action on the Senate floor, where similar legislation has been unanimously approved three times since 2001.

ABC News reported that lobbyists spent over $250,000 in 2001 to prevent a similar bill from passing the House that would make transport of birds for fighting over state and national lines illegal, the charge being a federal misdemeanor.

Supporters of the bill said then-Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., was instrumental in preventing it from going to vote by arguing that the states alone should handle the issue.

Resistance to the measure has stayed strong. After working on this bill for five-and-a-half years,  Rep. Blumenauer tells ABC News he is amazed at the power of cockfighting supporters to thwart popular and important legislation.

When legislation was introduced to increase the penalty to a felony last year, then-House Judiciary Chairman Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., blocked its consideration on the House floor, even though three-fourths of the House had signed on as co-sponsors of the bill, according to the HSUS.  He, like Lott, argued that the states should decide the penalty. 

Animal fighting is a billion-dollar industry, and hundreds of thousands of dollars can change hands at a cockfight, according to the HSUS.

Dogfighting is illegal in all 50 states, and cockfighting is illegal in all states but Louisiana. 

New Mexico outlawed cockfighting earlier this month.

Louisiana is expected to vote on a bill to outlaw cockfighting in April. Gov. Kathleen Blanco said in a statement the same day New Mexico outlawed the violent sport that she would support banning cockfighting.

To Blotter Homepage

March 27, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (12)

User Comments

I live in a neighborhood in Atlanta, GA where my neighbors have Fighting dogs. It has been difficult to stop this because they have to be "caught in the act". I can see them from my back porch but when the cops come they break it up. Dogs are left bleeding and injured. How can we prosicute when this is so difficult to catch at that moment?

Posted by: Alicia | Mar 27, 2007 12:15:51 PM

alicia - you should video tape it. if the authorities aren't interested, i'm sure the blotter would like the video...

Posted by: corbett | Mar 27, 2007 2:55:02 PM

Does anybody know what other pork barrel legislation was amended to and passed along with this bill?
Because I find it hard to fathom that there was this much concern on Capital Hillsoley over the humane treatment of dogs and roosters .
Then again, now that our representatives have already resolved health care, the economy, the war in Iraq, and every other critical issue that negatively affects ALL Americans, I suppose our law givers had to vote on something.

Posted by: Zach | Mar 27, 2007 3:10:15 PM

Can anyone imagine just how tough it must be to summon all the raw
courage it takes politicians to so quickly pass a bill impacting only those brutal jokers who profit by using dogs, chickens or any critter to destroy themselves,
while MILLIONS of the poor &
seniors either starve so to get a
little medicine, or forsake their
prescriptions to be able to eat,
but the NEW Congress has no time to deal with such problems ???

Posted by: NEED2CHANGE | Mar 28, 2007 12:40:04 AM

I live in New Mexico, I'm happy to see Cockfighting banned. I see no reason for humans to enjoy animals mauling each other for enjoyment. Any person, in my own opinion, that watches and enjoys such things is extremely sick and needs professional help. What's next,, fighting children? Thanks to the politicians in my state for finally showing some spine!

Posted by: Kate | Mar 28, 2007 2:11:46 AM

I smell a 'Red Herring'...

(Not that I am not thrilled to save even a few animals the torture they are put through just to give a few "humans" a jolt in their lagging testosterone !!)
Making animal torture a Felony crime should be rudimentary - not something politicians line up and get a pat on the back for!
Those of us who love and protect animals should be the real fear in their sadistic hearts! Let's not trust government to make all the difference.

Posted by: Rapunzell | Mar 28, 2007 6:49:12 PM

Is this in the Louisiana constitution? If we are to live by this constitution and its laws, could some one answer me this question: what makes a sport un-constitutional? On what grounds does this constitution have to outlaw cockfighting, or any sport? The way I read this constitution, it’s supposed to protect my rights not take them away. It’s supposed to recognize my right in the “pursuit of happiness” and protect my choice of living.

In Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, 4 S.Ct. 652 (1884), the Supreme Court was presented with the case involving a Louisiana statute granting exclusive and irrevocable right to operate stock-receiving and slaughter house operation to Crescent City Co. Crescent City Co. had sued Butchers’ Union Co. for a restraining order in an effort to enforce its exclusive franchise. This Supreme Court held that the grant was unconstitutional because it purported to be irrevocable, ceding authority of subsequent legislative action rescinding the monopoly grant.

Posted by: Daniel Saba | Mar 29, 2007 1:05:54 PM

The government is a large entity, and legislation on all levels, from municipal to federal, covers ALL aspects of civil and criminal law, from murder to cock fighting to immigration to cigarette taxation. Maybe this bill was tacked onto a larger bill, maybe like a concession of sorts.

Posted by: Jazz | Mar 29, 2007 5:52:12 PM

They have so many things going on in the state of Louisiana why would they be so worried about taking peoples family traditions away from them. When New Orleans has people getting killed every second. Why not worry about that?If you don't like cockfighting you don't have to go. No one begs you to go.

Posted by: Jessica Abshire | Apr 9, 2007 10:24:44 PM

It's interesting that when anyone has some sore of loathesome hobby, they justify it as "tradition."

Slavery was once considered venerable "Southern tradition."

It's disgusting that people take pleasure out of watching animals fight to the death. It says a lot about those who call this sport.

You have no rights to be cruel, ignorant jerks. There may be a tradition of it; the days of tolerating that tradition are over, just like there are no more gladiators or bear pits. Too bad for you.

Posted by: Daphne Moss | Apr 13, 2007 10:14:47 PM

We don't take pleasure out of seeing animals get hurt... it is a way of life and a way to make ends meet especially when you've done this all your life. Ask a boxer's wife and ask her if she takes pleasure out of seeing her husband getting beat, nearly to death at times. These people have put all their time and money into these animals.

Before you speak and point fingers make sure you hands are clean.

Posted by: paty | Apr 20, 2007 2:50:12 PM

the difference between a boxer fighting and animals fighting is that a boxer CHOSES to do that for a living, while an animal has no choice.

Posted by: vanessa | Jan 15, 2008 8:58:04 PM

Post a comment