BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Congressman From Virginia Tech's District Pushed Concealed Weapon Expansion
April 17, 2007 1:27 PM
Two months before the deadliest campus shooting in U.S. history took place at Virginia Tech, the congressman for the university's district introduced a bill to expand the use of concealed weapons permits nationwide.
Rep. Rick Boucher, the Democratic congressman representing Blacksburg, Va., has received an A+ rating from the NRA as well as $60,000 in campaign contributions from the group during his time in Congress, according to the campaign finance Web site OpenSecrets.org. The NRA has endorsed his concealed weapons bill, which he co-sponsored with Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla.
The two lawmakers introduced The National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act on Feb. 6. If enacted, it would allow concealed weapons carriers licensed by their home state to carry their weapons in other states which also grant such licenses.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Yesterday, 23-year-old Virginia Tech student Seung-Hui Cho opened fire on students and faculty at the southern Virginia campus using a Glock 9 mm semiautomatic handgun and a .22 caliber pistol and then shot himself. Thirty-two victims have died from his rampage, and more than 20 are injured.
Virginia allows citizens to carry concealed weapons with a permit, but universities and schools such as Virginia Tech do not allow concealed weapons on campus. Boucher's bill would not allow concealed weapons on school campuses.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Neither Boucher nor the NRA immediately responded to requests for comment on the legislation.
In a statement released yesterday, Boucher said he was "deeply saddened" by the shootings. "My thoughts and deepest sympathies are with the families and friends of those who were harmed in this horrific and senseless act."
The NRA yesterday also released a brief statement to say it "joins the entire country in expressing our deepest condolences to the families of Virginia Tech University and everyone else affected by this horrible tragedy."
"We will not have further comment until the facts are known," the group's statement concluded.
Rep. Stearns, who has sponsored similar bills every years since 1995, said in a emailed statement that while he saw "no apparent connections" between the Virginia Tech shootings and his bill, "it has been noted that an armed murderer was stopped in 2002 by armed students" at the Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, Virginia.
The details of that incident have been debated. Some reports at the time noted the shooter's gun was empty, and one participant said the shooter had put down his gun before he knew the students were armed.
In Congress since 1989, Boucher has voted against bills supported by gun control advocates 90 percent of the time, a 2006 study by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence found. He twice voted for bills that would bar Americans from suing gun manufacturers when their products are misused.
Jake Tapper contributed to this story. This post has been revised.
April 17, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (77)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
4-17-07-UPDATE: The Virginia legislature nixed a law that would have let these Vir. Tech students defend themselves… Gun bill gets shot down by panel HB 1572, which would have allowed handguns on college campuses, died in subcommittee.
A bill that would have given college students and employees the right to carry handguns on campus died with nary a shot being fired in the General Assembly. House Bill 1572 didn’t get through the House Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety. It died Monday in the subcommittee stage, the first of several hurdles bills must overcome before becoming laws.
Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker was happy to hear the bill was defeated. “I’m sure the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly’s actions because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on our campus.”
Posted by: turunen | Apr 17, 2007 1:41:41 PM
It is unfortunate that Rep. Rick Boucher's proposed expansion of the concealed weapons permits did not become law. Earlier this year the Virginia General Assembly failed to act on House Bill 1572.
If armed civilians had been present on the campus of Virginia Tech they could have stopped the murderous individual that killed over 30 people on Monday.
Posted by: Farwalker | Apr 17, 2007 1:44:30 PM
So whats y'r point?
Posted by: G.O.P. Love | Apr 17, 2007 1:45:39 PM
This guy Cho did not mind committing murder, so what makes you think he would obey some law about carring concealed weapons?
Posted by: Buck | Apr 17, 2007 1:48:40 PM
...having more permits available might have saved lives albiet with tougher restrictions and more testing especially mental..., no kidding, because in the end only lawful people will follow the law...having restrictions on carrying weapons or owning weaponing does not stop in any way someone from doing what happened yesterday.
Posted by: Aaron C | Apr 17, 2007 1:52:49 PM
Even if Mr Boucher and Mr Stearns had gotten The National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act, VT is still shamefully a gun-free-zone.
Law Enforcement, airline piolets, educators, some folks just need to be armed.
Posted by: Steven | Apr 17, 2007 1:56:23 PM
I fail to see the connection to any of this? I don't think a nationwide recoprocity law would ave any affect on this incident. He voted for bills that would bar suing gun manufacturers when their products were misused? Is the writer implying that someone should sue Glock now? This is merely an example of someone tryign to advance their own personal agenda by linking a tragic event to it in order to gain attention. This writer should be banned.
Posted by: tarheel72 | Apr 17, 2007 2:04:51 PM
So whats your point?
Posted by: G.O.P. Love | Apr 17, 2007 2:05:46 PM
seems like a stand up guy...
He is on the right track too. With 220 million firearms in America, there is no way in hell htat we are going to stop people from getting them. Instead we nneed to arm people who are decent upstanding citizens against criminals.
Posted by: john | Apr 17, 2007 2:28:19 PM
Rep. Rick Boucher is a man that represents the majority of responsable americans about the right way to handle guns. If a professor or student would have been carrying a gun to stop this unstable person, it may saved a lot of lives.
Posted by: Robert Williams | Apr 17, 2007 2:40:34 PM
I am sure a lot of people will use this tragedy to push their anti-gun politics. But to say this is the fault of the "gun" and there for we should outlaw guns would be the same as saying, "if we did not allow these forgieners into our country this would not have happened" so we should no longer allow forgieners into our country. This is a horrible, senseless act, to use it to forward a political ideology in my opinion would be morally wrong.
Posted by: Sawdust | Apr 17, 2007 2:42:11 PM
I do not see how one fact links with another.
1. This crazed gunman was not a concealed carry permit holder.
2. Concealed carry permit holders are not allowed on school campus
I think you are right in the middle of a logical fallacy.
Posted by: Max | Apr 17, 2007 2:51:15 PM
The Virginia Tech massacre is a good example of why concealed carry permits should be recognized on campus.
The killer was shooting un-armed fish in a barrel.
It's a shame none of the victims were armed.
This is why "gun free zones" on College campus is nothing more than an illusion of safety.
If you want real safety, get a concealed weapon permit and become proficient with your firearm, and carry it with you at all times.
Posted by: Paul Pendergraft | Apr 17, 2007 2:51:24 PM
Nice...should be kicking his own rear end right now. One cannot legally carry a concealed weapon in S. Korea and no school shootings ever...hmmm coincidence?? I THINK NOT!!
Posted by: Monica | Apr 17, 2007 2:53:18 PM
Well the other side is obviously, if the massacred students were permitted to carry concealed weapons would this tragedy have ended much earlier, or perhaps not at all?
Maybe this lunatic gets popped before he draws his pistol fully? Who knows, all I know is if an evil person is commited to doing an evil act, gun laws won't stop him. If we take away guns the only ones with guns left are the criminals and we're lambs to the slaughter.
Posted by: Mike D | Apr 17, 2007 2:54:59 PM
What's the relevance of concealed weapons permits to the Virginia Tech murders? If anything, allowing permit holders to carry on campus might have prevented some bloodshed. If this reporter's intent is to imply some kind of connection between permit holders, the NRA, or Boucher to the whacko student, I think that's pretty disingenuous. Why must we politicize this issue? Gun control can't prevent these crimes and arming everybody can't either.
Posted by: Rob | Apr 17, 2007 2:59:55 PM
BET THEY WISH THEY WOULD HAVE PASSED THAT LAW NOW. YOU LIBERAL'S ARE PUTTING US ALL IN DANGER.
Posted by: gary | Apr 17, 2007 3:09:45 PM
If the US in fact had a true "gun culture" like we did in the early 1900s when every 3rd person was carrying a side-arm or pearl-handled pistol in a purse. This guy wouldn't have made it past the 3rd victim.
Just because the average US citizen isn't smart enough to put together a bird feeder... let alone create a functioning hand gun, doesn't mean it can't be done with a few machining tools at any local shop. If we spend a lot of needless energy trying to rid the land of guns, it only assures that the next maniac will get to 40, 50, or 60 people before someone has the ability to put an end to it.
Posted by: Jason Shackelford | Apr 17, 2007 3:11:59 PM
As a graduate student and a gun owner, I just want to say I think it is irresponsible to blame Congressman Boucher for only supporting policies which his constituents elected him to support. The actions taken by the gunman at VT serve as a reminder that random acts of violence are situations which require us to be reactive in nature, reactive in immediate response, and in subsequent political debate. This is the United States of America, and as citizens, we are entitled by the Consitution to possess firearms. The shootings at Virginia Tech serve as a tragic reminder that in a free society, laws cannot ultimately prevent the acts of desperate men. The focus should be on why were these crimes committed rather than how.
Robert B. Kramer III, MPA
BA Criminology
Posted by: Robert Kramer | Apr 17, 2007 3:18:29 PM
If only the ban had been lifted it is possible someone may have been able to stop this killer. I am glad to see it was a Democratic Congressman who pushed for the repeal. This shows that gun rights for responsible, law abiding citizens is a bipartisan issue.
Posted by: CTK | Apr 17, 2007 3:20:32 PM
Post a comment
