BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
'D.C. Madam' Speaks with ABC News
April 09, 2007 4:42 PM
Alleged "D.C. Madam" Deborah Jeane Palfrey has given an exclusive interview to ABC News.
ABC News investigative correspondent Brian Ross recently interviewed Palfrey, who for over a decade operated what she terms an "erotic fantasy service" in the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area, for an upcoming investigative report on "20/20" and on "The Blotter" on ABC News.com.
Last October, federal prosecutors charged Palfrey with racketeering offenses in connection with the business, which she contends was a legal operation. From 1993 to August 2006, Palfrey ran a high-end escort service in the nation's capital, charging a flat fee for 90-minute "dates" with women between the ages of 23 and 55 whom she termed independent contractors.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
The women signed contracts agreeing not to engage in illegal activity, including having sex for money, Palfrey says, and were given guidelines on the difference between legal and illegal sexual behavior. At least one woman, Dr. Paula Neble, is known to have told federal prosecutors that she had sex for money while working for Palfrey. Palfrey is suing her for breach of contract.
Palfrey has claimed that her service's clients were "upscale" and "came from the more refined walks of life." In March, she made headlines by briefly offering to sell the phone records of her company, Pamela Martin and Associates, to the highest bidder. She withdrew the offer after a federal judge ruled the government could confiscate any proceeds. Shortly thereafter, Palfrey consented to be interviewed by ABC.
The network did not compensate Palfrey in any way for her interview or cooperation with Ross' 20/20 investigative report. "There was no consideration given or promised for Jean's cooperation with the story," said lawyer Montgomery Blair Sibley, who represents Palfrey in her effort to reclaim money and property seized by the government.
Palfrey recently dismissed the federal public defender representing her in the criminal case against her. She has asked the government to return $500,000 in her assets so she can pay for a new criminal lawyer; given that the government has unlimited resources with which to prosecute her, she has reasoned, the amount would be "fair play and due process."
This post has been revised.
April 9, 2007 in D.C. Madam Affair | Permalink | User Comments (88)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
If the govt wants to know whether or not these gals offered sex, have them ask Bill Clinton...he knows the difference between sex and no sex!
Posted by: pete | Apr 9, 2007 9:34:59 PM
Meh ... must be a slow news day if this is a top story.
Posted by: chris | Apr 9, 2007 9:36:00 PM
Awesome idea, Jim. What we need more than anything else is everyone paying attention to tabloid-worthy news rather than real issues. You rock.
Posted by: chris | Apr 9, 2007 9:39:20 PM
Prostitution should be legalized. It is a consensual activity between adults which harms nobody!
Posted by: david | Apr 9, 2007 9:58:03 PM
Since when i prostitution a federal racketeering crime??? Haven't the feds heard about Las Vegas?
This is a political crime and the thought police are making arrests
Posted by: john test | Apr 9, 2007 10:19:36 PM
What's funny are the people here (republicans) who either say that only Republicans will get blamed or the ones who say to just ignore it, while getting a dig in at Barney Frank.
It's like they already assume it's going to be another Republican...ie. Foley, Haggart. Hey, maybe there is a God.
Posted by: AnnieK | Apr 9, 2007 10:21:15 PM
so did i.
Posted by: mike | Apr 9, 2007 10:26:40 PM
Interesting that the government said they may "confiscate" the proceeds if the madam decided to sell her phone list. Guess you could call that a "rebate" huh?
Posted by: Tom | Apr 9, 2007 10:28:07 PM
David -- I fully agree prostitution should be legalized. But until the idiot politicians continue to arrest, prosecute, and ostricate those who frequent, lets see how many of them are hyopcrites in the mean time.
Posted by: Eric | Apr 9, 2007 10:48:34 PM
Tom -- that was hilarious.
Posted by: Eric | Apr 9, 2007 10:49:40 PM
:-) Thank you Eric....sometimes truth can be hilarious
Posted by: Tom | Apr 9, 2007 10:58:38 PM
I think this is great. Let's expose these corrupt politicians for what they really are....
Maybe we can get some new blood into the House, Senate and Exc branches and have a country ruled by THE PEOPLE once again. Personally, I think the govt is trying to gag her due to the harm it would cause them. I don’t blame her for trying to expose these people for what they really are; sleazy and corrupt.
Posted by: Chris X | Apr 9, 2007 11:32:00 PM
I call this period the great unravelling.... into things unknown.
Bill
Posted by: bilsher | Apr 9, 2007 11:39:20 PM
That threat to confiscate the
proceeds is as good
as a confession, but far more
damning.
D.C. again leaves Vegas in the dust:
Who could THIS judge be
protecting?
Posted by: Rob | Apr 10, 2007 12:01:50 AM
this should be a (another) lesson to people who hold information that is damaging to those in power: first, make multiple copies, second people with power WILL abuse it: when your operation comes under fire, distribute your info quickly before it is suppressed. You may have to give up the potential profits.
Posted by: mike | Apr 10, 2007 12:44:37 AM
bring the federal grand jury to the capitol steps and line up all accused of patonizing ms. pelfrey's business. then, all in unison,they can wag their fingers and say "i did not have sex with that woman's women". all will surely be re-elected.
Posted by: monte | Apr 10, 2007 12:58:09 AM
I'm going to do everything in my power to convince the prosecutors to drop all the charges against this woman. It's obvious to me that she's being railroaded. Ken Starr is behind this. I can feel it.
Posted by: Bill C | Apr 10, 2007 1:01:14 AM
HAHAHAHEHEHEHE
Palfrey has claimed that her service's clients were "upscale" and "came from the more refined walks of life."
..............HAHAHAHEHEHEHE
Posted by: Chase | Apr 10, 2007 2:31:28 AM
What a wonderful way to purge our crooked congress. Out with the kleptocrats of both parties. Juicy sex is about the only way to clean house in this whacky nation. Let's get those stories and the dirtier the better.
Posted by: aeskylos | Apr 10, 2007 4:37:04 AM
The reason this is a story,is because who is possibly on the list. I doubt that her business is totally legit, however, it is definetly no worse than anything else going on in d.c. at this time. She or one of her associates, pissed someone off that used her business. As far as getting rid of politicians who are corrupt, is fine, however, they would only be replaced by newer corrupt ones. They only serve those who have the money to pay. Maybe 1 or 2 percent are honest and wanting to work for the people, otherwise forget it.
Posted by: rick | Apr 10, 2007 4:55:07 AM
Post a comment
