BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Did the FBI Flub a Major Terror Investigation?
April 06, 2007 10:48 AM
FBI agents downplayed evidence of burgeoning cooperation between a domestic white supremacist group and an Islamic terrorist supporter, documents reviewed by ABC News show.
By curtailing its undercover investigation of the two groups, the bureau lost a "golden opportunity" to infiltrate a potentially deadly union between two violent radical organizations, according to a former FBI agent involved with the case.
The document reviewed by ABC News contained several redacted excerpts of a 157-page FBI transcript from a secret recording on Jan. 23, 2002 between a known Islamic terrorist supporter and an established member of a white supremacist group in Florida. It shows the two men discussed killing Jews and journalists, praised Hitler and Palestinian suicide bombing efforts in Israel and discussed general ways the two men could work together by using front companies and sharing resources.
"[T]he enemy of my enemy is my friend," the Islamic terrorist supporter said to the white supremacist at the 2002 meeting, according to the transcript, which was recently obtained from the FBI and entered into congressional testimony by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.
"That's where we're comin' from," the supremacist responded.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
"Anybody that's willing to...to shoot a Jew or to hit a Jew is my friend. Automatically," the transcript shows the Islamic terrorist supporter saying in response.
ABC News was allowed to take notes from the transcript excerpts, which are set for imminent publication in the Congressional Record, but was not allowed to make a verbatim copy of the entire document.
The FBI and the Department of Justice Inspector General have insisted the conversation had no significant connection to terrorism. But one veteran FBI counterterrorism agent told ABC News that's hard to fathom.
"There's no way you can discount this," Jack Cloonan, an ABC News consultant, said. Cloonan, who spent 27 years with the bureau and was the senior agent of its bin Laden unit, cautioned that it was hard to make conclusive statements about the transcript after reading only excerpts, but that he was alarmed by what he saw.
"I'm shocked, frankly, that this is the position the bureau is taking," Cloonan said. A discussion between known Aryan and Islamic extremists in which they praise violence and talk warmly of working together -- "this is what the FBI has said it's worried about," Cloonan said. "As a counterterrorism agent, this is what you live for."
The FBI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Months after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, a secret FBI informant helped agents from the Tampa, Fla. FBI office surreptitiously record the meeting between a man the bureau knew to be a known Islamic terrorist supporter and another man, an established member of a white supremacist group, in Florida.
Neither the men's identities nor the identities of the groups they represented were included in the transcript. At one point, the supremacist referred to the Palestinian group Hamas, which has staged suicide attacks against Jews in Israel.
"Just like Hamas. Not everybody in the occupied territories has that determination, that will, to do what has to be done," the supremacist states, according to the transcript.
After an FBI agent who was called in to consult on the operation raised concerns about how the recording was made and how the case was being documented, the office cut short the undercover investigation.
At first, agents from the case denied any recording had been made, according to a January 2006 Justice Department Inspector General's report.
The Inspector General concluded that FBI agents mishandled the case, falsified records and made misleading statements in connection to the recording. The report also confirmed that senior FBI officials had retaliated against the agent who had called attention the problem, Michael German.
German, a veteran undercover FBI agent who specialized in infiltrating white supremacist groups, left the bureau in 2004, after being barred from helping train new FBI recruits in undercover tactics. German has said that the FBI lost a "golden opportunity" by failing to conduct further investigation into the possible union.
The transcript "flatly contradicts statements made by bureau officials trying to downplay the incident and discredit Michael German," said Sen. Charles Grassley at a recent hearing. Grassley also challenged the reasoning of Inspector General Glenn A. Fine, whose report agreed with Tampa FBI officials that "no terrorist threat was missed."
This post has been revised.
April 6, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (13)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Ideology teams up with Americia's most ignorant. Two groups that have nothing postivie to share with the World.
Posted by: KJR | Apr 6, 2007 12:57:12 PM
Isn't it quaint how the word "redacted" has crept into and has begun to dominate the American lexicon lately in articles and documents provided by this government supposedly for, of and by the people?
I wonder how that would play out if the average American simply put that on their income tax returns?
Posted by: Zach | Apr 6, 2007 3:00:45 PM
The FBI breaks the law in listening in our phone conversations all in an effort to combat terrorism and then when they have the chance to actually follow through on it the war and do something they don't?!? And instead they punish the agent for bringing it to their attention?
Posted by: David Conklin | Apr 6, 2007 7:34:54 PM
"redacted" was not intended to be used as a means to escape charges for crimes committed, that is more normally referred to as "destruction of evidence" in an ongoing federal investigation, or "obstruction of justice," in any case.
A government official should only be able to redact information that threatens national security; otherwise, it is fair game. There is no executive privilege for criminal acts, only for legal ones.
Posted by: elephty | Apr 7, 2007 7:06:45 AM
Your phone conversations aren't important enough to listen in on, David.
Posted by: Jazz | Apr 7, 2007 9:19:41 AM
Jazz, Actually, they collect ALL our phone calls then they let a supercomputer analyze them. My point was that the FBI wanted expanded powers, got them, went beyond them and they STILL dropped the ball!
Posted by: David Conklin | Apr 7, 2007 5:26:30 PM
to Mr. Conklin
Dropped the ball, or intentionally grounded it?
Remember the anthrax mail? Anthrax as a weapon has been a mainstay in white supremacist literature for decades, even Australian government spokesmen raised this point during the time Bushco was trying to blame it on Iraq.
Whatever became of the investigations into the anthrax mail anyway?
Posted by: brian | Apr 8, 2007 4:28:37 AM
to Mr. Conklin
Dropped the ball, or intentionally grounded it?
Remember the anthrax mail? Anthrax as a weapon has been a mainstay in white supremacist literature for decades, even Australian government spokesmen raised this point during the time Bushco was trying to blame it on Iraq.
Whatever became of the investigations into the anthrax mail anyway?
Posted by: brian | Apr 8, 2007 4:55:20 AM
Hey, that squiming of the info,was done by Democrats, in the FBI office, not the REbulicans.
Yes this info went all way to top of congress.
Posted by: Tim Shores | Apr 9, 2007 1:33:56 AM
There hasn't been a credible attempt of a terrorist attack in the USA since 9/11.
People are losing their interest in the "War on Terra".
The Bush Administration is so desperate for another such terrorist attack that they ignore evidence indicating the possibility that terrorist groups are operating within the USA.
Posted by: johann | Apr 10, 2007 1:02:12 AM
What an old story...of course they flubbed a major investigation and it is called Sept.11, 2001. Did the whitewash house call them off? Inquiring minds want to know!!!!
Posted by: daddy | Apr 11, 2007 9:57:53 AM
Actually, David, they don't and can't collect ALL of our phone calls. How impossible is that? What they do is use keywords searches. When those keywords are hit upon then they will record the conversation. Unless you are uttering some very specific language, then you my friend are of no interest to the FBI. Even if you were to utter one of those keywords, it would be rejected immediately for content. Either you want the FBI to try their best to stop these guys from exploding a bomb, of any size, in your friendly neighborhood shopping mall or you don't. They can't use magic. The only weapon we have is our technological advantage. So the FBI listened to some personal phone calls, BFD. Just as soon as something else happens all of you will be screaming at the top of your liberal lungs, "What did the FBI know?". Well thanks to a bunch of whiners like you, they don't know much now.
Posted by: rayban | Apr 12, 2007 1:34:23 PM
What our Government is doing, by listening to our phone calls without a court order, is illegal. And, as our own government continues to remove our rights people like rayban will still be saying it is a good idea. Freedom for Security? I don't think so!
Posted by: crayfish | Apr 16, 2007 12:19:52 PM
Post a comment
