Wow, 3 out of 4 are Republicans. What does that tell you about the party and the entire Bush administration?

well, at least they are consistent!

Hey John,

At least the Repubs aren't about to surrender to the Islamo fascists in Iraq. Dingy Harry is making B. Arnold look like a patriot.

If I were the decidererer, I would stage another fake 9/11 (though this time the attack would be on a deserted mountain in Nevada), declare martial law, remove all current house and senate members, set strict amounts for government financing of elections and allow the people, for once, to actually elect representatives (without the influences of PACs - such as AIPAC - or NRA or NEA or whatever), require the FCC to require equal air time for diverse views (at media conglomerate expense). Then with a new congress in place that is more likely truly representative of the people I would happily resign my dictatorship.

Hey John,

At least the Repubs aren't about to surrender to the Islamo fascists in Iraq. Dingy Harry is making B. Arnold look like a patriot.

[Renzi has denied the charges and said the FBI raid on his wife's insurance business as "the first step toward getting the truth out."]

Someone should tell Mr. Renzi it is perfectly legal to GIVE files and such to the FBI. If he was so concerned with "getting the truth out," he needn't have waited for the raid.

Dr wesler, what are you smoking? does that sound like the deciderer

hey stanowicz, wake up and smell the coffee buddy. Quit with the koolaid. Open your eyes. Face reality.

The not needed Iraq war has made the Islamic terrorists the world over much more dangerous. There are a lot more of them now, with more being created every day by Bush's incompetence.

Start caring for the safety of your country and her military, instead of caring more for your religious-right-controlled, corrupt and incompetent Republican party.

I’ve always wondered and been fascinated with the intelligence aspect of our entering into war with Afghanistan.

History now reveals that former President Roosevelt knew well in advance about the upcoming Pearl Harbor attack. This politically evasive truth later showed us that American intelligence professionals had successfully deciphered Japanese communication codes months prior to the actual invasion.

Remarkably American intelligence officials informed the president of precisely what the Japanese where up to well in advance of that memorable aggression. I should mention that over fifteen hundred innocent lives where lost in that one attack on America. 9/11 doubled those casualties

What people of that day were left unaware of was, the president had callously looked the other way when it was within his executive power and authority to act. This was a grossly manipulative strategy that Roosevelt employed intending to provoke the American people.

Roosevelt’s proven successful theory, noted that if he was to secretly allow the Japanese attacks to occur, that particularly blood curling act of foreign aggression would provide the much needed political mechanism of persuasion. There would be no public dissent.

American policy had up until that point, avoided external conflicts with any nation that had not purposely threatened or attack America, or our vital interests. President Roosevelt’s ingenious call to war effort eventually proved right on the mark. Soon after the fiery catastrophe in that forever altered Hawaiian bay, America for the very first time in the history of the most powerful nation in the world, America committed it self to it first war of choice.

True similarities, or mere coincidences, who really knows for sure, but the facts as they parallel have a lot of folks doing a real double take. I think sooner, or later we will probably have to confront the enormous, but universally avoided question. Did George W. Bush know, or should he have reasonable known, about the planned attacks on the WTC through the Pentagon’s Project Able Danger?

What we do know right now for sure is the sneaky way it has all come down surely warrants further investigation.

SacrAmerican

I love the way the republican neos whine and complain when they get gaught with their hand in the cookie jar1

I believe there are dirty Democrats and Republicans. Wm Jefferson, D-La, and Harry Reid, D-Nv have both had very shady situations that have never been investigated. Does that mean they didn't occur? No. It means, IMHO, that when this hits the MSM, it is swept under the rug, so as to be quickly forgotten. However, when a GOP Congressman has something hit the MSM, it is emblazened on the front page, makes the nightly news circuit and is kept alive for weeks, there by taking the view away from the Democrat wrong doer. Neither is correct. Wrong is wrong regardless of party affiliation and should be investigated. Period.

Rick in Germany

I agree, Rick in Germany, wrong is wrong. What is very interesting is that Sandy Berger, during the 9/11 commission hearings, was caught removing classified information from the National Archives and admitted that he had done that before and had either lost or destroyed other classified documents. Not much is spoken of regarding that situation. I completely agree that all persons guilty of crimes should be punished; moreover, imho, all persons, regardless of party affiliation, should get equal media coverage for their behavior, good or bad.