BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
First Gun Bought March 13; No 'Spur of the Moment' Crime
April 17, 2007 11:12 AM
Seung-Hui Cho bought his first gun, a Glock 9 mm handgun, on March 13 and his second weapon, a .22 caliber handgun, within the last week, law enforcement officials tell ABCNews.com.
"This was no spur of the moment crime. He's been thinking about this since at least the time he bought the first gun," said former FBI agent Brad Garrett, an ABC News consultant.
Both guns were bought in Virginia, according to the officials.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Under Virginia law, state residents can only buy one handgun in any 30 day period, suggesting Cho bought his second weapon after April 13, or sometime over the weekend.
"He clearly spent some time figuring out how he was going to take care of business once classes began on Monday morning," said Garrett.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
The date of the first gun purchase will likely serve as the time of "some triggering mechanism that was very important" to Cho said Garrett, an expert on profiling murderers.
Watch the New York City Investigation's Illegal Gun Buy: Links on the Right Side of the Linked Page.
April 17, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (788)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Give the press somewhat of a break. The guns are barely out there yet. No there is no 22mm handgun, but if I were a betting man the gun has some British or European origin and the 22 moniker is not a millimeter but inches as is the measure in Britain for example.
So the calibre is not 22mm but .22 inches which would be 5.6mm. These handguns exist. The writers, without knowing anything about firearms, see the .22 and assume 22 mm. How can we expect them to know all that? Although no regular person could be walking around with a 22mm pistol. It would be crazy.
Posted by: Scot | Apr 17, 2007 11:39:09 AM
"Cho Seung-Hui bought his first gun, a 9 mm handgun, on March 13 and his second weapon, a 22 mm handgun, within the last week, law enforcement officials tell ABCNews.com."
This article is incorrect. There is no such thing as a 22 mm handgun. There is a .22 caliber handgun. Please get all of your facts right before you publish any article. Thank you.
Posted by: Steven J. Wolf | Apr 17, 2007 11:39:25 AM
John:
1. why would the media be biased against the type of gun he bought? Who really cares what type of gun he bought anyway, the point is about how he got it.
2. You CAN buy guns at gunshows without a background check. Undercover tv reports have proved this again and again. Federal laws are not enforced 100% at all.
Posted by: Mike | Apr 17, 2007 11:39:36 AM
a 22mm handgun does exist. I own several.
Posted by: Fred Braune | Apr 17, 2007 11:39:38 AM
John, a 22mm hand gun does exist. I own one. Check your facts. Personally it doesn't matter if he bought them legally or not, he was going to use them no matter how he purchased them. End of story.
Posted by: Paul | Apr 17, 2007 11:39:52 AM
I believe the posts by John Sims are focusing on the wrong thing- Does it really matter that the calibur of gun is wrong? The bigger picture here is that innocent people have lost their lives in this horrific event.
Posted by: Cara | Apr 17, 2007 11:41:30 AM
had those same gun laws applied to the people on campus mabey he could have been stoped
Posted by: lara | Apr 17, 2007 11:41:31 AM
There's deffinately a .22 handgun. My buddy has one. Even though it's not going to blow a hole in anyone, it's extremely deadly. The bullets will go on and just bounce around in someone's body. The 9mm is more likely to pass through. Also, you can aim and fire repeatedly with the .22, without having any kick. In the movies, a lot of assassins use a .22 handgun.
Posted by: rc | Apr 17, 2007 11:41:52 AM
Great editing guys; 22mm? Thats nearly one inch in diamter.
To answer the debate about the gunshow laws... In Virginia, all dealers at shows are required to do checks. The loophole is created when a private person rents a table.
Posted by: Ben | Apr 17, 2007 11:41:52 AM
Millimeter = Caliber--wikipedia
From Dictionary.com - I think it fits
Semantics is commonly used to refer to a trivial point or distinction that revolves around mere words rather than significant issues:
Posted by: Javier | Apr 17, 2007 11:41:53 AM
Oh here we go. Let's blame it all on Bush. Did your milk go bad in your refrigerator? Must be Bush's fault. Did you run out of gas? Blame it on Bush. Why are we always so quick to blame someone instead of accepting responsibility? Just like a liberal......
Posted by: Adam | Apr 17, 2007 11:41:58 AM
Wow! A 22mm. That's got to be a lot to lug around. Idiots. It's .22 caliber. As in .22 inches. Don't write a story containing information on guns if you can't even get a 22 correct.
Posted by: Ace | Apr 17, 2007 11:41:58 AM
22 millimeter handguns are illegal. Any firearm over 12.7 millimeters is banned by federal law in the United States.
I guess gun control works, because he murdered people with a gun that he could not have possibly owned legally in the first place.
Posted by: Eric | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:03 AM
This is great news for anyone else planning a massacre: You might have thought it difficult to obtain a gun! You might even have been put off your plan! But fear not: you have a friend in the State of Virginia. Now let's go get those guns.
Posted by: Eric | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:07 AM
Please, for the love of God, don't turn this into an anti-Iraq tragedy. It makes no sense.
Posted by: George | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:15 AM
Jacquelyn, I agree we should not be in Iraq, but what is your point? Our military can not be used to deter or control crime domestically.
Posted by: Mark | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:17 AM
John Sims is absolutely correct - the journalism here is pretty innacurate and disappointing; can you guys at least bring it up to a professional level? Anyway, in light of the date, perhaps this guy was aiming for Friday the 13th as his big day. Lord knows what his motive was...
Posted by: Jazz | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:18 AM
why do we care what kind of gun it was or wasn't....the fact of the matter is, is that he was able to walk in purchase two weapons wtihine the last four weeks, without a problem...end of story...it's obsurd to see you guys spit your knowledge about guns, when below the surface, a gun is a gun and in this case took the life of 31 people..
Posted by: macdadddy1 | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:25 AM
So wait, we're now talking about killing the 2nd Amendment because of one wacko only a few days after killing the First Amendment via Imus? Wow, the America-haters are sure having a helluva week...
Posted by: Dan | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:29 AM
This is great news for anyone else planning a massacre: You might have thought it difficult to obtain a gun! You might even have been put off your plan! But fear not: you have a friend in the State of Virginia. Now let's go get those guns.
Posted by: Eric | Apr 17, 2007 11:42:32 AM
Post a comment
