BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
IAEA: Iran Has 1,300 Centrifuges Up and Running
April 19, 2007 10:05 AM
Jacqueline Shire contributed to this report.
International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors have confirmed through firsthand observation that Iran has over 1,300 centrifuges in operation, a diplomat close to the organization told ABC News.
The finding, noted in an April 18 letter from the IAEA to Iran, confirms earlier ABC News reporting that Iran had drastically increased its capacity to enrich uranium, which can be used for reactor fuel at low levels of enrichment or for nuclear weapons at much higher levels.
In the letter, the IAEA wrote that Iran has claimed to have "eight cascades" operating at the Natanz fuel enrichment plant. Each cascade consists of 164 centrifuges, bringing to just over 1,300 the number of centrifuges Iran is operating. IAEA inspectors have been into the underground cascade halls and seen the centrifuges, the diplomat told ABC News.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Previously, Iran had acknowledged only 320 centrifuges at the site.
Just nine days ago, Iran announced it had reached the "industrial scale" to produce nuclear fuel at the site.
In its letter, the IAEA, an intergovernmental body which monitors nuclear efforts around the world, also expressed concern that Iran may be moving ahead with work on its heavy water reactor without submitting to inspections and other verification measures, as it had agreed to. "As Your Excellency's authorities are aware...[the agreement]cannot be modified unilaterally."
ABC News consultant Jacqueline Shire, a senior analyst at the Institute for Science and International Security, noted that the IAEA had earlier sought to install cameras at the Natanz facility in order to monitor activity there. Surprise inspections, she said, involved logistical challenges and may require the group to maintain personnel in Iran on a close to ongoing basis.
April 19, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (74)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Iran is giving very effective arms to eL Quieda and deveoping nuclear weapons and has publically stated IT will destroy Israel.
We HAVE to stop them. So it is either wait couple years till all hits the fan or do it now ... and it will all hit the fan, but less terribly.
Russia is rebuilding its Cold War Military Might and they will hit us when we hit IRAN .... so do it NOW while Rusiia is still weak and Iran is not yet to the nuclear capability
Posted by: Houghton Coleman | Apr 19, 2007 10:58:07 AM
What are we waiting for? Get this over with already, the UN is completely worthless, it's in business to launder money and steal funds the US contributes, a bunch of worthless paper pushers!! The longer we wait, the less likely IRAN will submit to anything!
Posted by: T | Apr 19, 2007 11:07:03 AM
No do not stop Iran from it's nuclear program. When they strike they will take out Democrat strong
holds in the US.
Posted by: Bill | Apr 19, 2007 11:08:40 AM
Actually Mr. Coleman, Al Qaeda is a Sunni group and Iran is a Shiite group. They hate each other. Iran might be giving arms to Shiite militants in Iraq, Al Sadr and his ilk, but definitely not Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda is fighting against Iran.
Posted by: Kevin H | Apr 19, 2007 11:12:43 AM
Just a reminder to those who crave war, the American military is strapped. If we had enough troops, then Bush would not have to extend the tours of duty in Iraq. If we attack Iran, there will have to be a draft to effectively carry out the attack. We do not have enough troops. We have seen what lack of preparation has done to Iraq. We could have been successful, if they had committed the resources. Let us not be hasty and make a similar mistake with Iran. The results of such an action would be disastrous.
Posted by: Kevin H | Apr 19, 2007 11:17:31 AM
Very funny, too bad it ain't true on the last post.
Posted by: JJ | Apr 19, 2007 11:17:37 AM
"the IAEA, an intergovernmental body which monitors nuclear efforts around the world,"
Nice try conveying the UN is some sort of world government. The IAEA is part of the UN. They don't govern anything.
Posted by: Dave | Apr 19, 2007 11:22:48 AM
Lace up your boot straps everyone between 18 and 35. If we attack Iran directly there is no way the armed forces can keep troop levels stable without a draft. Not to mention add another 80 billion a year for another war that comes out of our pockets. The solution is simple. Bully the security council to cut all refined fuel from entering Iran and stop all export of crude oil out. The ruling party would collapse in about a month and we would not start world war 3.
Posted by: Louis L | Apr 19, 2007 11:29:19 AM
History is trying to repeat itself. This is true in every way. So, now we need to make that move, kill or be killed. It is an axle of evil that is churning over there. Time is ticking away.
Posted by: J.C. | Apr 19, 2007 11:30:22 AM
1,300 is not nearly enough to make even one bomb a year. Their program is shabby -- Pakistan is 20 times more advanced.
Posted by: M | Apr 19, 2007 11:39:53 AM
Iran has three times the acreage and three times the population of Iraq. Even at full strength the US Army would have thier hands full in Iran.
What we need to do is a precision air strike on the sites that are doing the refining. And maybe send a special forces team to pick up a couple key leaders.
When the good people of Iran find that the leadership is missing, they can pick up the peaces and start a more peaceful govenrment there.
Posted by: ken | Apr 19, 2007 11:46:55 AM
Dave, the article states "intergovernmental"...that is exactly what the UN is. "Intergovernmental" means it is an entity comprised of representatives from various governments around the world. ABC isn't attempting to "convey" anything.
Posted by: Jazz | Apr 19, 2007 11:47:07 AM
OK, boys and girls, let's play a little mind game. Recently, a hand full of British sailors were taken captive. For the threat to 15 souls, Iran was able to force England to accept its terms and conditions. Now, imagine that Iran were to announce today that they have one, just one, atomic weapon. And, let's imagine that they said that they would use it to blow up a random Western population center. Or, maybe the target would be the oil fields of the Middle East. Maybe they would just pop the thing in the Suez Canal. By that point, do you really think the nations of the world would do anything EXCEPT follow their dictates? The gun may not be to our heads yet, but it is most certainly in the hands of a madman. And, he is currently loading the bullets. If we allow this to continue to what has to be the ultimate result, we truly deserve to reap what we have sown.
Posted by: Stuart | Apr 19, 2007 11:59:33 AM
Iran is controlled by right-wing, militant, religious freaks, bent on converting the world to their way of thinking, governing, and praying. When this is the motivating force of a nation, logic, humanity, and truth are the first casualties....Somehow, the Iranians may have noticed a similar dynamic at work right next door in Iraq, and feel threatened,.....suppose?
Posted by: Bruce | Apr 19, 2007 12:19:32 PM
Why does some people believe that we "need" ground troops? One month of bombing would about do it for awhile, at least enough to take care of the current leadership.
Posted by: Ed | Apr 19, 2007 12:21:28 PM
I'm sorry, Bill, are you advocating the destruction of thousands of human lives, in your own country no less, based on the idea that they have different political views than you? I just pray that somehow I've misunderstood your post. I mean surely you don't actually mean that you hope other innocent civilians, living and working in the land of free speech, freedom of association, and freedom of religion, die because they happen to be members of another political party or even just in close proximity to other people that are members of another political party. That is utterly abhorrent. Not to mention, if DC were taken out, for example, I imagine they would catch a couple of Republicans in the mix. Really well reasoned.
Posted by: SC | Apr 19, 2007 12:24:00 PM
I am not arguing that we attack them first. That is flat out immoral. However, if I were president of the US, I'd make sure they knew that any first use of nuclear weapons by them would be met with a response so overwhelming that Iran would cease to exist. Civilian nuclear power? Fine. Weapons for defense? Fine. First use? Down you go.
Posted by: wisdom | Apr 19, 2007 12:24:13 PM
If the United States would every need to invade Iran, I hope we will learned from our past mistakes. Keep Congress and the media out of the decision making on how to run a war. It didn't work in Korea, Vietnam and now in Iraq. The military is ran by officers who have been trained for combat and diploymacy for years. While Congress has only been trained on how to waste our money on anything they desire. There is only 1 commander in chief, not 535 plus all the bleeding heart liberals
Posted by: Bill | Apr 19, 2007 12:31:22 PM
I agree that Iran needs to be dealt with, but I'm disturbed at some of the ignorance to the Middle East that I see here. I'm pretty conservative and support active involvement in the Middle East. Make no mistake though, and learn from Iraq, that no matter how much the people of Iran hate their government, they'll pull together against us once the bombs start falling. If we're going to do something about Iran, we need the world behind us, and we need to be ready to go to all out war for an entire generation.
Posted by: amaduli | Apr 19, 2007 12:33:39 PM
Alright everyone its time to WAKE UP! Has anyone heard the phrase, "The enemy of my Enemy is my friend" Even if Iran is Shite and Al Quida Sunni, doesn't matter, they are still Muslim and the Great Evil Empire in their minds is the Good Ole USA! They will work together to destroy the US and after that then kill each other.
To the person that called our President a dictator..sorry Charlie, if we or he were anything like a dictatorship, you wouldn't be able to write it without having secret service at your door by dinner time today!
Posted by: Heather A. | Apr 19, 2007 12:40:11 PM
Post a comment
