BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Report: Corruption Investigations in Iraq Stopped in Their Tracks
April 30, 2007 12:01 AM
Investigations into government corruption in Iraq are being stopped in their tracks due to an antiquated law that has been reinstated by the prime minister, according to a report to be released today by the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.
The report says that corruption in Iraq is a "major impediment to Iraq's development and growth." The special inspector general estimates that more than $5 billion a year of Iraqi government funds are diverted due to corruption and charges that some in the Iraqi government have been hindering ongoing investigations.
A large part of the problem, according to the report, is that Iraq's prime minister's office is using a law dating back to the 1970s to stop ongoing investigations in their tracks. The law says that no case can go forward without the approval of the minister of the affected agency. So far, the report says that various agency ministers have stopped the prosecution and investigation of 102 individuals involved in 48 cases.
The prime minister's office has also ordered that any case involving a minister or former minister must have the approval of the prime minister before it can be recommended to an investigative court.
One of the cases, which has been referred to the prime minister's office, involves eight ministers and 40 directors general who are accused of mismanaging $8 billion.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
A case against the minister of oil was also referred to the prime minister's office following the arrest of one of the oil minister's directors.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who is not named directly in the report, admitted in an interview with al-Iraqiyah television last year that corruption in general is a problem, but he refused to name those responsible for it.
"We suffer in terms of security and administrative corruption," he said. "However, and in accordance with the government plan, we will use force and will be hard and pursue those who tamper with people's funds. I cannot reveal the names of those who were arrested, expelled or brought to account for their corruption."
The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has appointed a director of the Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT) to advise Iraqis how to investigate corruption within their own government. According to the OAT, the biggest problems hampering the investigations are "lack of security for investigators and the limited ability of ministers to stop specific corruption investigations in their ministries."
The Ministry of Oil, Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Defense are the subjects of the most corruption claims, said the inspector general's report.
Meanwhile, Iraq has committed to establishing a Joint Anti-Corruption Council that will include representatives from the prime minister's office, the courts and representatives from both the U.S. and U.K. embassies. The report said a committee was scheduled to meet back in February to sign the charter establishing the council but that the meeting was postponed by the Iraqi government.
Read the inspector general's report.
Vote: Should the U.S. intervene in corruption in Iraq?
April 30, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (31)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
People, how is it that if we just threw out the government and rewrote the consitution that there is a "law on the books' from the 1970's?
Posted by: Mark Maxwell | Apr 30, 2007 7:54:58 AM
Corruption is rampant throughout the Middle East and probably will never end. This is another sign that the Iraqi government is ignoring American advise and doing what they want. Maliki is pretty much worthless as a prime minister as he presents an obstacle to the country moving forward. The American govt will have to realize this and not provide any extra money that will end up being misused. Time to get out before we end up losing billions more dollars!
Posted by: Bob Brown | Apr 30, 2007 8:54:42 AM
This drives me nuts. Our money is being thrown away.
Posted by: patricia licopoli | Apr 30, 2007 9:12:56 AM
Let's stop this game and bring our people home from Iraq. We will not succeed with a corrupt government and an Iraqi security force with diverse allegiances.
Posted by: John | Apr 30, 2007 9:55:17 AM
It's interesting that for so many of these Iraq corruption/political malfeasance stories you can simply substitute the United States or some political entity in the U.S. and the story is a match. The primary difference is, in the United States our political and business "leaders" have mastered and refined the art of corruption at a very high level, shrouding it in obfuscation.
Posted by: greg wadsworth | Apr 30, 2007 10:04:52 AM
Allowing so many of our people to live and die in Iraq for this sort of nonsense is what some consider to be supporting our troops???
Good reporting ABC/Blotter!
Posted by: Zach | Apr 30, 2007 10:10:59 AM
Finding corrupt government in any country surprises anyone? In Europe, as in Asia, it's accepted and understood that there is always going to be a certain amount of corruption in your governmental system. I am dismayed that even in this country people are shocked to find pocket stuffers elected to office. Look in your own back yard America. It's just people doing as people do. Only this time it's ever there and they're doing it with your/our money.
Posted by: Maxify | Apr 30, 2007 10:48:07 AM
This is Iraqs democracy at work. A west friendly dictatorship would have been a better option both for the people of Iraq and for the US. Introducing democracy in Iraq is to invite people with no loyalty to the west in. People who know they have a limited time to secure financial assets and power. It's in their self interest to cause as much corruption as is humanly possible. If they can get the US out they have succeeded and they will end the democracy experiment pretty soon after.
Posted by: Dan | Apr 30, 2007 11:08:16 AM
The corruption in the Iraqi Government is mearly an extension of the kind of Governments that have existed in that region of the world for thousands of years. Democracy is an abarition to those people and always will be. I supported the war in the beginning, but now that they have had every chance to better themselves and still refuse to be civil, I believe we need to just get out and let them destroy themselves. The rest of the world may have to go in there and really defeat them some day, but this kind of piece-meal approach is not helping. It's mearly throwing away blood and money for nothing.
Posted by: Russ | Apr 30, 2007 12:12:11 PM
Looks like the Iraqi have taken a page out of the Republican playbook...
Posted by: Devil's Advocate | Apr 30, 2007 12:34:51 PM
Democracy cannot be imposed - it has to be chosen. The US has tried to impose the type of government that it wants, in so many spots around the world, for decades and look at the mess it has now created.
Posted by: Richard | Apr 30, 2007 1:37:28 PM
If they cant bother to track, prosecute, and name the criminals, then we cant bother to pay for it.
Welcome to the current form of American democracy. You got to choose who is going to steal from you, sorta.
Where is the oversite and accountability? Or did someone already imbezzle those?
Posted by: Jason | Apr 30, 2007 1:58:49 PM
I can't believet hat we are sending our children over there to die so that the Iraqi govermnent can line their pockets. When are we going to face the facts that Iraqi people are not ready for democracy, but they are ready for every man for himself at our expense!
Posted by: karen | Apr 30, 2007 2:39:34 PM
With all that wasted money we could have built a giant protective bubble over the US....
hmm..I guess a govt that is formed out of corruption will always be corrupt.
Posted by: Aaron C | Apr 30, 2007 4:17:04 PM
Silly question at the end..."Should the US intervene in corruption in Iraq?".
Intervene, you say!!! WHAT?!?! The American people are still trying to find out what happened to $12 Billion in cash that was 'supposedly' sent to Iraq for 'reconstruction'. We could contract this oversight function out to Halliburton or Blackstone so they can tell us how much they stole and how much went to Iraqi pols. GET IT???
Posted by: Lloyd Cata | Apr 30, 2007 5:22:14 PM
Considering it was us that created the regime change and have spoon fed the Iraqis the current government they've "selected", this under handedness isn't all that surprising.
After all, "the fruit doesn't fall far from the tree".
Posted by: Zach | Apr 30, 2007 5:57:29 PM
Okay, so due to Iraq corruption AND Halliburton & Company corruption totalling billions and billions... exactly how much money has been stolen out of EACH and EVERY patriotic American in support of the George & Dick disaster?
Posted by: Rick_VT | Apr 30, 2007 10:41:57 PM
They seem to be taking lessons directly from the Bush administration. I wonder if they are also losing important documents and refusing to comply with subpoenas, like most Bush appointees seems to be doing right now.
Posted by: SheilaNoya | Apr 30, 2007 10:58:11 PM
The Iraqi officials have had good teachers for the past several years. If we knew half of what was going on here in our government, we would stop worrying about Iraq, bring our kids home, and let that bunch of crooks in Iraq fend for themselves. Making crooked money on kickbacks is probably why they want the war to continue also.
Ron N.
Posted by: Ron N. | May 1, 2007 1:22:47 PM
Why did the US military load $12 BILLION in freshly printed CASH and fly it to Iraq to be distributed without any oversight? You don't believe that really happened do you?
Posted by: Eric | May 1, 2007 10:03:15 PM
Post a comment
