« Previous | Main | Next »

U.S. Corporations Lobby Against New Protections for Chinese Workers

April 13, 2007 12:13 PM

Worker_china_law_nr Labor rights advocates say U.S. multinational corporations have aggressively lobbied to weaken key provisions in a new Chinese law that would expand rights and protections for Chinese workers.

"U.S. corporations have used their considerable power and influence there to weaken the labor laws that are being proposed," said Ellen David Friedman, a  U.S. labor organizer who's worked  with developing trade union groups in China.  "They are in essence acknowledging that what they have liked about doing business in China is the very, very cheap labor and the low level of enforcement."

The Chinese government is drafting a new labor law, expected to be finalized in the next few weeks, in response to increasing worker unrest over low and unpaid wages and poor working conditions.  Labor rights advocates say the new law will provide Chinese workers with minimal protections that are commonplace in developed countries, including enforceable contracts, the role of unions to negotiate on behalf of employees and severance payments.

When the Chinese government announced the new labor law last year, American corporate trade groups were quick to object to many of the law's provisions.

The American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai known as AmCham said the law was "a step backwards" and laid out what it called "fundamental defects" in the law in a 42-page document submitted to the Chinese government. The group argued that current Chinese labor law was sufficient for protecting Chinese workers if the laws were properly enforced.

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

AmCham, along with the U.S.-China Business Council, which together represent hundreds of companies doing business in China, including Wal-Mart, Microsoft, General Electric and Dell, argued that the law would negatively impact China's competitiveness and appeal to foreign investors. None of the individual companies responded to requests for comment from ABC News.   

Several key provisions they took issue with, such as a requirement that employers negotiate with union workers over workplace conditions and large scale layoffs, were then removed from a second draft of the law.

"Corporations have been going in front of the American people and policymakers for a long time saying we are going to bring a culture of rights to places like China, and we're going to raise standards," says Brendan Smith of Global Labor Strategies, a labor rights group that has published reports tracking the new law.  "This lobbying campaign really belies those claims because here they are actively lobbying against improved rights."

Representatives at both AmCham and the U.S.-China Business Council contacted by ABC News denied they are lobbying against the law and said their comments to the Chinese government were meant for clarification purposes and not to prevent improved working conditions and protections.  Read AmCham's full response.

"The specific provisions that we submitted comments on were to make sure they equally benefited the employers and the employees," said Erin Ennis, vice president of the U.S.-China Business Council. 

Supporters of the law say the U.S. companies are not taking full responsibility for how their business practices allegedly contribute to worker exploitation.   

Liu Cheng, a Shanghai legal scholar who advised the government on the draft proposal, says the pressure U.S. companies exert on their Chinese suppliers to cut costs leads to labor abuse. "After so many years of the multinationals dominating, things are getting worse," says Cheng.

Chinese workers have staged tens of thousands of strikes and protests over the past few years, expressing discontent over poor working conditions and low and unpaid wages. Cheng says that the new law is a modest step toward addressing rising worker unrest and ensuring social stability. "It's reasonable and rational for companies to want to make money, but there has to be balance," says Cheng.

April 13, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (8)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I was in China a couple of weeks ago and the headline was that several US corporations were found guilty of paying less than minimum wage to par time workers.

Posted by: MARC POCHE | Apr 13, 2007 4:02:57 PM

Almost 80 years after Upton Sinclair's novel The Jungle exposed corporate greed and industy's disregard for the worker, and big business is still at it.
The sheer disrespect and contempt for the very people who labor to make these businesses profitable has simply after all these years moved from the US and Europe to China and whatever other country whose leadership will bow to them at the expense of the people.
Maybe where capitalism is concerned, there is ample reason to doubt evolution.

Posted by: Zach | Apr 15, 2007 6:45:41 PM

I agree, I am also against the increase of workers rights of the Chinese people. I shop at Wal-Mart.

Posted by: Jazz | Apr 16, 2007 1:37:59 PM

The U.S. Corporations are hurting workers there, and, as a result, also hurting workers in the United States. We have a huge trade deficit with China because goods are so cheap to produce there, instead of here. This also keeps the jobs over there, instead of here. American workers lose, Chinese workers lose, American corporations win.

Posted by: Rod M | Apr 17, 2007 9:41:30 AM

The Chinese will fight for their rights over time themselves. They are not a flock of sheep as you tend to think. If the world is to develop peacefully, everyone needs to be given opportunity to labor and add value to the global economy. USA needs to think about Japan - Toyota. We want to make cars or make shoes? Do we want to make memory chips or make underwear?

Posted by: be_logical | Apr 17, 2007 4:28:24 PM

If this subject is of interest, see the documentary film, "China Blue" about the making of jeans in China.

Posted by: Roberto | Apr 17, 2007 5:41:50 PM

Those who are complaining about the huge trade deficit with China, have you ever think of who are maximizing profits in the bilateral trade? I understand that the American workers are suffering from losing jobs, but still many American people are benefiting from cheap Chinese goods. These Chinese goods are competitive in the market because millions of Chinese workers are working over 60 hours per week, with a pay of less than $100 per month, with absolutely no welfare whatsoever. What do they gain from the trade deficit? These workers are young so they can tolerate the exploitation. What if they got sick, injured or simply growing old? It is the China which will burden the future of these workers. And by then, the multinationals may have moved away with the biggest chunk of the trade deficit.

Posted by: Sophie Chen | Apr 19, 2007 10:34:18 PM

Who cares if the Chinese have low labor standards? I don't care. We are the United States and they better do what we want or else. Besides, they are just a bunch of commies and so they don't deserve to earn much money. It's our punishment for them being communist. Maybe when the Chinese wake up and become a democracy like the USA, then they can get better pay.

Posted by: Bob Miller | Apr 20, 2007 12:19:47 PM

Post a comment