BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Anti-Fraud Official Faces Fraud Probe
May 01, 2007 9:42 PM
A senior government official is under investigation by a congressional committee for allegations he engaged in "widespread fraud, waste, and abuse" -– the same misbehavior he is supposed to ferret out.
Johnnie Frazier, the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is said to have rigged contract bids for cronies, fraudulently charged the government for improper travel, wasted tens of thousands of dollars on an erstwhile office remodeling and may have destroyed files that were proof of his wrongdoing, according to accounts given to lawmakers by current and former employees.
As his department's senior investigator, Frazier is supposed to "detect and prevent waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement" at Commerce, according to his office's Web site.
In an April 27 letter to Frazier announcing an investigation into his office, House Energy and Commerce Chairman John. D. Dingell, D-Mich.; ranking member Joe Barton, R-Texas; subcommittee Chairman Bart Stupak, D-Mich.; and ranking subcommittee member Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., detailed a wide range of allegations they had received from whistle-blowers in his department.
The lawmakers requested Frazier provide them with documentation related to the allegations.
A woman who did not identify herself answered the phone Tuesday evening at a number listed as belonging to Frazier. When ABC News explained the purpose of the call, the woman responded, "He's not going to want to talk about that." Before hanging up, she asked ABC News not to call back. In a statement to the media, Frazier's office said it was "cooperating fully" with investigators.
According to the congressmen, Frazier is alleged to have repeatedly charged the government for excessive and unnecessary travel unrelated to government duties, allegedly including trips he told people were really to find post-governmental employment.
Whistle-blowers said that Frazier gave a retirement bonus as a wedding gift to a former employee who was marrying another member of Frazier's own management team, the lawmakers wrote.
The congressmen also said Frazier allegedly ordered another senior official to prepare fraudulent application material on behalf of a "pre-selected candidate" to justify the hire. In another instance, they say Frazier allegedly told a subordinate to prepare job descriptions for senior-level positions to ensure that only certain of his friends would qualify.
Frazier also allegedly improperly arranged for a no-bid contract for $150,000 to go to a company that was connected to a retiring member of his staff.
The lawmakers relayed allegations that Frazier had the walls in his office torn down to create an "open floor plan" and ordered modular cubicle furniture for the space. But when his special assistant "complained about having to work in a cubicle," he allegedly ordered the walls rebuilt.
The combined cost for converting back to the original work space was alleged to be a high as $100,000, according to whistle-blowers.
The lawmakers said they were particularly troubled that Frazier, a seasoned career investigator, is alleged to have destroyed, altered and tampered with evidence during the course of an official investigation into some of the complaints.
"It is alleged that one or more of your staff assisted you in deleting e-mail messages from your computer after an [Office of Special Counsel] investigation [into allegations of retaliatory behavior] had already begun," the men wrote.
Current and former employees also told the committee members that individuals were seen in Frazier's office possibly deleting documents, in particular relating to his travel, according to the letter.
In the past, some Democrats have considered Frazier, who served under President Bill Clinton, to be one of President Bush's better choices for an agency inspector general post. While criticizing the White House for appointing partisans to such investigative offices, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., cited Frazier as an exception.
"Johnnie Frazier worked for 21 years at the Department of Commerce IG office before President Clinton appointed him Inspector General there," Waxman noted approvingly in a 2005 report.
A committee spokeswoman told ABC News Tuesday evening that they had not yet received a response from Frazier.
Photo is courtesy of the Department of Commerce. This post has been updated.
May 1, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (27)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Well now that most of you have killed this person even before he gets to trial, what the hell do we need the court systems? Now, don’t get me wrong I’m not supporting this guy, but what happened to “innocent UNTIL proven guilty”?????????? What happen to lets ‘see all the facts’ to make a conclusion? It seems it only apply to non- Republicans! And yes, there is a double standard today in our country’s political beliefs. I see it the voices on the web and in the news media. Even George Tenet stated in his newly released book, Iraq according to their information HAD WMD’S before we went to war! So sad so many people jump to conclusions without ALL the facts!
Posted by: Christine | May 2, 2007 10:23:22 PM
I wonder what the out cry would be like here if Sandy Berger had worked for Bush instead of Clinton and did what he did with stealing 'what could have been' very IMPORTANT National material? I do wonder what the out cry would be here and on other sites like this? I wonder!
Posted by: Christine | May 2, 2007 10:40:00 PM
Being an anti-fraud official, he probably figured his office would be the last place they'd be looking for fraud. Is it my immagination....or is all this corruption getting worse?
Posted by: Dave | May 4, 2007 3:36:08 PM
It is fraudulent for an anti-fraud official to be involved in fraudulent activity. But I like the syntax nonetheless.
Posted by: Germanized | May 4, 2007 6:50:41 PM
I worked for the U.S Government and few of my co-workers were currupt. Unfortunately, the one's who were, were the ones who controlled the purse and also the ones who had the power to fire the rank and file if they learned any of us were liable to blow the whistle. We had morgages and kids and couldn't afford to lose our jobs, especially when we knew no one would ever hire a whistle blower.
That's why so much of our tax money gets stolen. If we could just spend half of the amount that's stolen on insulated, protected auditors who are paid enough so they are not tempted to join the thieves, we could at least be sure the other half of the money would be available for what it was meant to do. These auditors should be an elite corp answerable only to Congressional committees staffed with equal numbers of Democratic, Republicans, and independants. But I guess that would be too logical and full proof and, of course, lobbyists would refuse to allow THEIR representatives in Congress to go along with it.
Posted by: jan | May 5, 2007 1:16:36 PM
Take it from me, an actual insider (now retired), the DOC IG office has been morally backrupt for decades.
Johnnie's predecessor, Frank DeGeorge, pleaded guilty in 1998
to criminal conflict of interest because of jobhunting activities with a major gov't contractor. That was probably the least of Frank's moral lapses. Like a true Republican bueracrat, he thought rules/laws were for other people.
Back when Johnnie was merely a manager, he was notorious for arranging audits in shopping paradises like NYC, where he mysteriously disappeared during the day while his auditors did the actual work.
Posted by: Former-DOC-IG | May 9, 2007 2:00:47 PM
As another former DOC-IG employee for many years, I totally agree with my fellow former colleague. It became so depressing working there that after many years I finally moved on. The culture was to promote people that you like rather than on experience and merit. I am so glad that this investigation is underway, I hope it really shakes things up. I also applaud the courage of those current and former employees that have turned Johnnie in.
Posted by: Another-Former-DOC-IG | May 11, 2007 11:00:26 AM
Post a comment
