Army Threatens Critic Over Blog Policy

May 09, 2007 12:01 PM

Justin Rood Reports:

Army_threatens__mn The U.S. Army has apparently threatened a government secrecy expert for posting online a new unclassified Army policy document, just days after he was quoted criticizing the policy itself as "outrageous."

From the Washington, D.C., offices of the Federation of American Scientists, Steven Aftergood publishes "Secrecy News," a Web site and newsletter on government secrecy, his area of expertise.

A Wired News article last week quoted Aftergood disparaging the Army's new, more restrictive regulations intended to keep service members and civilian contractors from disclosing sensitive information about troop movements or operations.

Some fear the new rules, which appear to require that communications in any form be reviewed by senior officers or advisors, will silence military bloggers and others communicating from war zones in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

"Outrageous," Aftergood said to Wired News about the requirements, which state that writing about innocuous details like the number of cars in a parking lot or the frequency of orders from a pizza restaurant could violate operations security, or OPSEC.  "That's not OPSEC, that's stupidity."

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

When Wired News published the unclassified policy document on its Web site, Aftergood downloaded it and posted it on his own site, along with dozens of other reports, studies and statements from Pentagon offices and other government agencies.

Two days later, Aftergood received an e-mail that appears to be from the U.S. Army.

"You have Army Publications hosted on your website illegally," stated the e-mail, which appeared to be from an Army publications employee Cheryl Clark. "There are only 5 Official Army Publications Sites, and you are not one of them."

The e-mail stated that Aftergood could link to Army publications but could not host the documents on his own computer. What's more, she noted that the document, while unclassified, was stamped "For Official Use Only," meaning it was "not intended for public release."

"Please remove this publication immediately or further action will be taken," the e-mail concluded.

Unclassified government documents generally are not restricted in their use under law and are considered publicly owned. While it may be a violation of Army rules to disclose the internal document, Aftergood -- a civilian -- is not bound by those rules.

Yesterday, Aftergood replied to Clark that he would not remove the document. "Our publications are not illegal nor in violation of any applicable regulation," he wrote. He offered to add a disclaimer to his Web site "indicating that ours is not an official U.S. Army web site."

Wired News, which also offers the controversial Army policy document on its Web site, confirmed to ABC News Tuesday afternoon that the U.S. Army had not asked them to remove it.

"I don't know if it's a clumsy attempt at intimidation, but it's not persuasive," Aftergood told ABC News on Monday. He said he believes the note was "some combination of zeal and ignorance."

Neither the Army public affairs office nor Clark responded to requests from ABC News to comment for this story.

To Blotter Homepage

May 9, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (16)

User Comments

The army is censoring the blogs of its personnel?

No different than how ABC treats their patrons.

Posted by: JelloBiafra | May 9, 2007 1:30:03 PM

By the way, who gave Justin Rood 'Delete Post' permissions?

Whoever did was dumb. It lost you thousands of viewers.

Posted by: JelloBiafra | May 9, 2007 2:05:49 PM

Anybody in the military KNOWS you're not supposed to indicate troop movement, or any other sensitive information that could jeopardize the execution of the mission and the safety of personnel (especially in combat). Most soldiers in combat would kick your a** if you put them in danger...whoop dee doo...big story...

Posted by: Jazz | May 9, 2007 2:11:56 PM

Vietnam redux. We need new civilian _and_ military leaders.

Posted by: wwz | May 9, 2007 5:10:05 PM

Aftergood also pointed out to the Army that their "regulation" was, by law, not copyrighted. It was, therefore, a public document with absolutely no restriction of any kind.

The Army guys need to thank their lucky stars that Aftergood isn't an attorney. Getting a temporary injunction against them would have been about 5 minutes worth of work. A permanent injunction against the entire U.S. Army would have taken just a bit longer. But usually when you file a complaint that refers to a Federal Statute, it's not complicated.

Judges usually have no problem at all issuing an injunction which requires the respondent to abide by the law.

Mike

Posted by: Mike | May 9, 2007 5:25:59 PM

I am so freaking tired of our stupid government and its desire to morph into the old Soviet Union. Are we seriously supposed to support such idiocy with the blind zeal Bush and his lap dogs demand? Stories like this are becoming all to frequent.

Posted by: clint | May 9, 2007 8:06:53 PM

Clint, this country is a LONG WAY OFF from being anything like the USSR..."I'm so tired of our stupid government" might have gotten you imprisoned under Breshnev...

Posted by: Jazz | May 9, 2007 10:08:33 PM

Jazz, it's not as LONG WAY OFF as you think - here's questions to answer: Which country imprisons more people than any other? In which country is prison-building, maintenance etc. a multi-billion dollar industry and growing? And, who are the people in the prisons of that country? Are they the wealthy and powerful? Why do you think there is so much crime in that country? Is it because people are content and satisfied with their life there? Take a hard look, my friend - we're on the eve of . . . .

Posted by: St Ann | May 10, 2007 2:13:42 PM

The document is not secret and it's not protected by copyright. If the Army didn't want it published, they shouldn't have published it.

The Army is not only wrong, but stupid. No wonder the Iraq War is lost. These people can't find their ass with both hands.

Posted by: William Wilson | May 10, 2007 11:16:28 PM

St Ann, gotta disagree with you...we're on the eve of...what...tomorrow? uhh, anybody comparing the USSR (Soviet Azerbaijan, Byelorussia, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Russia, etc) with the US today doesn't have any clear idea of what life in the Soviet Union and is just ignorant of the truth.

The Soviet government established its economic priorities through central planning, a system under which administrative decisions rather than the market determine resource allocation and prices, UNLIKE the capitalist system of the US.

Yes, the US has a big prison industrial complex - the biggest in the world. That still doesn't equate our system with the Soviets. The PIC is built on capitalism...capitalism, not hard line communism.

There's so much crime in the US because we live in a free society. You know that people are in prison mostly because of drugs...I've spent a HUGE part of my life in poverty and in the hood...it's really not necessary to take the criminal route out. It is a choice. Our system (as opposed to the closed system of the Soviet Union) allows for options...mobility...opportunity. You can take what you have and run with it, if you want to. Many people in the hood living on public assistance (socialized living - the second "S" in USSR) do not know how to live otherwise. They are the ones who think they have to be dependent on government in order to survive. THAT is a socialist model.

Anyway, the article above is about the military, not the exclusive private sector...

get a clue, kids...

Posted by: Jazz | May 11, 2007 8:09:23 AM

Jazz, StAnn is much closer to having truth than you. Most people could say things against government. In certain places, maybe KGB is nastier, but most places was not a problem to talk.

Captailism and Communism are not so different. People at top get everything they want, people at bottom get only enough to survive. That is important part. Everything else is like color of paint. You must be loyal to OUR color of paint, or we punish you. But still it is only color of paint.

Posted by: Natalya Pozdnyakova | May 11, 2007 8:54:00 AM

People at the bottom CAN get to the top in this country. Of course 95% of the wealth is owned by 5% of the population (or a close approximation thereof). You gonna take that lying down? Or are you going to fight for your life to aquire wealth (if that's what you're into)? It's your choice...you can get with this or you can get with that...

And I don't buy into the paint color analogy; I'm loyal to myself...

Posted by: Jazz | May 11, 2007 9:52:03 AM

Interesting discussion comparing Eastern European countries to the US. As under the USSR era, you were only allowed to pledge a belief in their government. Our ACLU will make that become a reality before long. That society paid a dear price with no moral basis for their country. Now in Eastern Eupropean countries like the Ukraine, they teach the bible in PUBLIC CLASSROOMS because they now know you can't live without God. I pray the US doesn't have to find that out the hard way as well.

Posted by: Lori | May 11, 2007 1:09:01 PM

In light of the fact that the fort dix six were going to use a pizza delivery guy to attack a base, perhaps it isn't so "stupid" to restrict posts about "...innocuous details like...the frequency of orders from a pizza restaurant..." I was in the army and know that all this just comes with the territory. If you don't like it, go find yourself another job where you can post all you want. God Bless America!

Posted by: luis | May 11, 2007 1:33:17 PM

Ah, freedom of speech.
You can kill for it.
You can die for it.
But heaven help using your right to exercise it.

Posted by: Zach | May 12, 2007 2:53:20 PM

what a sad world we live in when people are asked to die for something when they cant even use it themselves.... another example of how fear driven this government/administration is... all critics will be silenced. all we need now is someone like Joe Stalin in government... oh we have him... its dick cheyney.... the next administration needs to clean house through every single branch of government including the military.

Posted by: sk8boardgrind | May 16, 2007 9:09:03 PM

Post a comment