« Previous | Main | Next »

Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran

May 22, 2007 6:29 PM

Bush_authorizes_mnThe CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert "black" operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com.

The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the subject, say President Bush has signed a "nonlethal presidential finding" that puts into motion a CIA plan that reportedly includes a coordinated campaign of propaganda, disinformation and manipulation of Iran's currency and international financial transactions.

"I can't confirm or deny whether such a program exists or whether the president signed it, but it would be consistent with an overall American approach trying to find ways to put pressure on the regime," said Bruce Riedel, a recently retired CIA senior official who dealt with Iran and other countries in the region. 

Click Here to See Photos of the Players in Another Iran Operation -- the Iran-Contra Affair: Where Are They Now?

A National Security Council spokesperson, Gordon Johndroe, said, "The White House does not comment on intelligence matters." A CIA spokesperson said, "As a matter of course, we do not comment on allegations of covert activity."

The sources say the CIA developed the covert plan over the last year and received approval from White House officials and other officials in the intelligence community.

Officials say the covert plan is designed to pressure Iran to stop its nuclear enrichment program and end aid to insurgents in Iraq.

"There are some channels where the United States government may want to do things without its hand showing, and legally, therefore, the administration would, if it's doing that, need an intelligence finding and would need to tell the Congress," said ABC News consultant Richard Clarke, a former White House counterterrorism official.

Current and former intelligence officials say the approval of the covert action means the Bush administration, for the time being, has decided not to pursue a military option against Iran.

"Vice President Cheney helped to lead the side favoring a military strike," said former CIA official Riedel, "but I think they have come to the conclusion that a military strike has more downsides than upsides."

The covert action plan comes as U.S. officials have confirmed Iran had dramatically increased its ability to produce nuclear weapons material, at a pace that experts said would give them the ability to build a nuclear bomb in two years. 

Riedel says economic pressure on Iran may be the most effective tool available to the CIA, particularly in going after secret accounts used to fund the nuclear program.

"The kind of dealings that the Iranian Revolution Guards are going to do, in terms of purchasing nuclear and missile components, are likely to be extremely secret, and you're going to have to work very, very hard to find them, and that's exactly the kind of thing the CIA's nonproliferation center and others would be expert at trying to look into," Riedel said.   

Under the law, the CIA needs an official presidential finding to carry out such covert actions. The CIA is permitted to mount covert "collection" operations without a presidential finding.

"Presidential findings" are kept secret but reported to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and other key congressional leaders.

Check out the Brian Ross Webcast: More on CIA's 'Black' Operation in Iran

The "nonlethal" aspect of the presidential finding means CIA officers may not use deadly force in carrying out the secret operations against Iran.

Still, some fear that even a nonlethal covert CIA program carries great risks.

"I think everybody in the region knows that there is a proxy war already afoot with the United States supporting anti-Iranian elements in the region as well as opposition groups within Iran," said Vali Nasr, adjunct senior fellow for Mideast studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

"And this covert action is now being escalated by the new U.S. directive, and that can very quickly lead to Iranian retaliation and a cycle of escalation can follow," Nasr said.

Other "lethal" findings have authorized CIA covert actions against al Qaeda, terrorism and nuclear proliferation.

Also briefed on the CIA proposal, according to intelligence sources, were National Security Advisor Steve Hadley and Deputy National Security Advisor Elliott Abrams. 

"The entire plan has been blessed by Abrams, in particular," said one intelligence source familiar with the plan. "And Hadley had to put his chop on it."

Abrams' last involvement with attempting to destabilize a foreign government led to criminal charges.

He pleaded guilty in October 1991 to two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from Congress about the Reagan administration's ill-fated efforts to destabilize the Nicaraguan Sandinista government in Central America, known as the Iran-Contra affair. Abrams was later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush in December 1992.

In June 2001, Abrams was named by then National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to head the National Security Council's office for democracy, human rights and international operations. On Feb. 2, 2005, National Security Advisor Hadley appointed Abrams deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor for global democracy strategy, one of the nation's most senior national security positions.

As earlier reported on the Blotter on ABCNews.com, the United States has supported and encouraged an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, that has conducted deadly raids inside Iran from bases on the rugged Iran-Pakistan-Afghanistan "tri-border region."

U.S. officials deny any "direct funding" of Jundullah groups but say the leader of Jundullah was in regular contact with U.S. officials.

American intelligence sources say Jundullah has received money and weapons through the Afghanistan and Pakistan military and Pakistan's intelligence service. Pakistan has officially denied any connection.

A report broadcast on Iranian TV last Sunday said Iranian authorities had captured 10 men crossing the border with $500,000 in cash along with "maps of sensitive areas" and "modern spy equipment."

A senior Pakistani official told ABCNews.com the 10 men were members of Jundullah.

The leader of the Jundullah group, according to the Pakistani official, has been recruiting and training "hundreds of men" for "unspecified missions" across the border in Iran.

May 22, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (1652)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I for one appreciate ABC's courage in letting Americans know what the government is up to. It's the present insane US government, not the Iranian, that's a threat to US citizens.

Posted by: janet | May 22, 2007 6:57:50 PM

You people should be arrested, tried and convicted as the treasonous scum that you are. And ABC's rebroadcasting license should be revoked.

Posted by: tjt | May 22, 2007 7:01:18 PM

Thank goodness for Brian Ross, a very brave reporter in this nation of sheep.

Posted by: Peter | May 22, 2007 7:01:40 PM

How can you possibly air something like this in the middle of a war? We are under attack from Islamic Jihadists, many of whom are funded through Iran and you have the unmitigated gall to put our men and women defending our country at risk? What country gives you your "freedom of the press"? Do you even care any more how you constantly undermine our own country's ability to defend itself? Do you not know we are AT WAR??????

Posted by: Ed Eubank | May 22, 2007 7:02:31 PM

I commend you for continuing to keep a watchful eye on our government.

Posted by: Ryan | May 22, 2007 7:02:59 PM

You shouldn't even call yourself ABC anymore. Why don't we just call you EBC, Extremist Broadcasting Corporation.

No care for the nation your company takes its name from. If you read Iran Daily (which is Gov. controlled), they leak NOTHING to risk making their government look bad.

American news companies no longer care about America.

Posted by: Adam O. | May 22, 2007 7:03:04 PM

The programing editors are idiots. Stop buying products advertised on ABC WORLD NEWS today!!!

Posted by: Taylortucky | May 22, 2007 7:05:00 PM

Great reporting ABC. Democracy relies on a well-informed populace, and I'm glad to see that you're bringing important things like this to the public light. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: C. J. | May 22, 2007 7:09:51 PM

Thats it! I'm done watching abc news! I'll be the first to join you Stephen!

Posted by: Dave | May 22, 2007 7:10:09 PM

What is it about "secret" that ABC does not understand. It is shameful to put out a story revealing National secrets. We have enemies in Iran that would like to kill Americans all over the world. You should think before you act. Someone should be arrested for revealing this information. I hope the Justice Department acts.

Posted by: Al | May 22, 2007 7:11:25 PM

My husband and I are disappointed again that ABC News would put their own commercial interest ("scooping" a story)above America's national security. Wouldn't we rather be fighting a covert war to destabilze Iran than a war in the streets? If we were fighting a war in the streets in cities of Iran ABC would be bringing us the "dreadful" news every night.

Posted by: Susan H | May 22, 2007 7:13:56 PM

I totally agree with the overwhelming consensus of the message posted. ABC news by reporting this has shown its blantant anti-Bush bias and more importantly its willingness to betray America in pursuit of this agenda. If such traitorous and vile media had existed in WWII, we would still be fighting that war, if not lost it altogether.

Posted by: Johnny D. | May 22, 2007 7:14:58 PM

who thinks abc news and others are part to blame for our soliders being killed for leaking to m u c h information.. think about it, dont you think the bad guys watch and read this crap?

Posted by: stephen | May 22, 2007 7:15:02 PM

Charles Gibson and the fine people of
ABC news obviously are not concerned about the welfare of our country. Have you forgotten about 911? Maybe you're not worried because after all, this is "ratings"... you have just shown how desperate you are. SHAME on you.

Posted by: kittykc | May 22, 2007 7:15:10 PM

I am deeply disappointed that your alleged news organization would broadcast to the enemy, an islamic state who hates freedom, Christians, and most of all, Americans. "Treason" is too kind of an adjective to apply to brian ross. I dare say you are no more American than the disgusting kouric wretch.

I would like to call you all a lot of bad names. Where is that imus guy when he might be of some use?

mes

Posted by: M.E. Simpson | May 22, 2007 7:15:37 PM

First Amendment rights, once again, trump any other rights. Such as: the right to LIFE, for many people, the right and responsibility of a government to do all in its power to protect it's citizens.

Yes, there needs to be a free press in order to have a democracy. But a free press SHOULD have the integrity and moral courage to know what should not be broadcast, rather than being driven by the insatiable lust for ratings.

I was once a devout ABC news fan. Recent storeis, including this despicable bit of reportage, have drastically lessened my opinion of the organization.

This is just over the top!!!!

Posted by: Phillip Lomblo | May 22, 2007 7:16:05 PM

You have to be one ignorant sucker to not have known the US was already in Iran. Bush and his criminal politicos are fostering giant increases in terrorism in the US. Just wait and see. He has caused more harm to the US than any other president in history. Now, we'll all pay for it. God what morons these neo cons turned out to be.

Posted by: Esteban | May 22, 2007 7:16:45 PM

I trust that ABC News will not be intimidated by the opinions of a few frightened ignoramuses who would surrender their First Amendment rights to a gang of "patriotic" criminals like Abrams and Hadley. Sincerely, a Korean War veteran who continues to value the Constition and laws he swore to defend.

Posted by: Richard Young | May 22, 2007 7:18:16 PM

we want responsible news networks like fox news!!!!!!!! they would never stoop this low.

Posted by: stephen hare | May 22, 2007 7:18:28 PM

ABC News is irresponsible in reporting secret documents and must be paying a lot to get information leaks. There is a difference in being a news reporter rather than a commentator, however both require patriotic integrity, which both Brian Ross and Charles Gibson appear to be lacking. If you are citizens of the United States then act like it.

Posted by: K.C.Adamek | May 22, 2007 7:19:03 PM

Post a comment