« Previous | Main | Next »

Dems Take Aim at Lawmakers' Potential for Insider Trading

May 18, 2007 4:24 PM

Dems_take_aim_a_mn Democratic lawmakers are pushing a new bill that would bar members of Congress from using their inside knowledge of congressional action to profit from investments. But experts doubt the move.

The bill, reintroduced Wednesday by Reps. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., and Brian Baird, D-Wash., would ban lawmakers from using nonpublic information to buy and sell stocks. Slaughter said that since members of Congress have access to market-moving information before the public does, "the potential for abuse is very real."

Slaughter pointed to the 2005 Securities and Exchange Commission probe into whether someone in former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's office shared inside information with Wall Street investors. Stock prices of some companies with asbestos-related liabilities rose just before Frist proposed a $140 billion public trust fund for asbestos liability claims.   

Frist has denied any wrongdoing. An SEC spokesman refused to comment on the probe or Slaughter's pending legislation.

Frist faced questions from the Justice Department and the SEC in 2005 about another allegation of insider trading stemming from his sale of stock in his family's hospital company, HCA Corp, one month before its price fell sharply.    

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

Last month the SEC closed that probe without charging Frist. The former Senate majority leader  maintained throughout that he got no insider information and that he actually began laying the groundwork for the sale of HCA stock by making inquiries to lawyers and to the Senate Ethics Committee well before the transactions took place.

Political watchdogs say Slaughter's proposed rule would be nearly impossible to enforce.

"Is the SEC really going to do an insider trading investigation every time a lawmaker makes a trade? That's an impossible amount of investigating," said Melanie Sloan of the Washington, D.C.-based Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Sloan also said the bill is unlikely to pass. 

"Members of Congress never want to crack down harder on themselves. I frankly don't think this is going anywhere," she said.

The bill also cracks down on efforts by private investors to beat the market by buying inside information on what Congress is likely to do.

Hedge funds and other investment firms have reportedly found Washington to be a gold mine of information that affects the market. Some firms are hiring lobbyists to give them the inside track on upcoming trade regulations, Medicaid reimbursement, corporate tax legislation and other information to guide their investments.

"There are a handful of law and lobbying firms that have developed a good reputation and market themselves in the investment community," said lobbyist Matthew "Mac" Bernstein of the prominent Washington, D.C. lobbying firm DLA Piper.

The new bill would require such firms to register their "political intelligence" clients the way they register their traditional lobbying clients.

"Anytime any investor uses nonpublic information to gain advantage over everyone else, it undermines the integrity of our stock markets," said Slaughter.

May 18, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (7)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Like 'put options' on American and United Airlines?

Posted by: Hill Bicks | May 19, 2007 12:20:37 AM

Stock market integrity, who's whoing who? After Enron, Qwest communications, Price Waterhouse and countless other "scandals" prove that the stock market has no integrity now, and probably never has had any? Politicians should be barred from owning stocks, all stocks should be in a blind trust before they take office, and not touched until two years after they leave office

Posted by: brian | May 19, 2007 2:33:58 AM

Politicians are two faced...most are out to line their own pockets as if they are not paid enough to start with..they vote themselves a pay raise. How many American citizens get to do that...what happened to the raise in minimum wage? Ie doesn't bother them how long it takes cause it doesn't affect their paycheck. I think it is disgusting that they use inside information to gain more for their own pocketbook.That goes to show you how much they care about the average citizen. It all about greed and power. They would all go to jail if it were left up to us. Not many trustworthy politicians left that we can depend on to look out for US!

Posted by: CJ | May 19, 2007 1:24:29 PM

Let's start off talking about CIA insider trading on 911.

Posted by: UomodiRispetto | May 20, 2007 9:57:51 PM

Ban Congress's potential for using insider info to make money?!

How cruel can they get?

Posted by: amenhotep_V | May 21, 2007 3:58:09 PM

JOHN GOTTI WAS AN HONEST PERSON COMPARED TO OUR POLITICIANS..
PROVES THE POINT THAT ALL LAWYERS ARE CROOKED..

Posted by: John Adamas | May 22, 2007 8:47:21 AM

I agree with the concept of insulating Congress from the stock market, say with blind trust accounts that can't be accessed for a period of time after leaving office, but how could that really work? A crook can always find a way, through a middleman ("associate", if you will) or a ghost company, offshore. I say, get corporate money out of elections, ban offshore companies (now Halliburton)from doing business with the U.S. government, and enforce the laws we already have on insider trading. But I don't think people will ever really trust the market after Enron and Quest, do you?

Posted by: bob crawford | May 26, 2007 9:18:17 AM

Post a comment