« Previous | Main | Next »

In Newsletters, 'D.C. Madam' Gave Advice, Scorn

May 01, 2007 9:31 AM

In_newsletters__mn Even call girls get performance reviews, at least the ones who worked for Jeane Palfrey's Washington, D.C., escort service.

"Without being overtly vulgar, a pair of tits and an ass, without accompanying brains, sophistication, LOOKS and carriage, just won't cut it in this business or at least, not with this particular agency!!"  wrote Palfrey in a monthly newsletter sent to the women who worked for her. 

Calling herself "Miz Julia"  or "the management,"  she regularly offered criticism, beauty advice and warnings about undercover police during the 13 years her business, Pamela Martin and Associates, was in operation.

D.C. Madam Affair Unfolds in Pictures.

In a January 1994 newsletter, she wrote, "Congress is back in session. This always helps to boost business."

In another edition, she complained, "That damn Monday night football...ruines [sic] business every single Monday night!"

Not all were racy. In several dozen issues reviewed by ABC News, much of the content would almost be recognizable to anyone who's pulled shifts in cubicle land: exhortations to improve organization and efficiency; handy tips for improving employee performance; updates on company policies.

"Nail color is to match the lipstick color. The lipstick color is to compliment a person's natural coloring," she advises, along with passing on details of a "fat cream for the thighs" and retin-A so "a gal of 40 can shave off 4-6 years realistically. Mgt. encourages such."

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

Palfrey was a stickler for punctuality.

"Organization and efficiency need to be, No, must be the bedrock from which the on-call escort service operates," reads one passage from 1993. In that particular article, Palfrey encouraged her employees ("girls," as she called them) to invest in cellular phones.

"Searching for pay phones in strange places and driving in circles when lost are extraordinarily exasperating and frustrating experiences, which need not be," Palfrey counseled.

Palfrey used her newsletters to instruct women in her employ to destroy all records or notes connected to the business, complaining about one of her girls arrested in a police sting in Alexandria, Va., "The bimbo kept records."  "Destroy the data immeidately [sic]!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" she wrote, while repeatedly demanding the women save all newsletters and adhere to the policies and procedures they dictated.

Prosecutors obtained a number of the communiqués and used them to build their case against Palfrey.  In one court filing, prosecutors used passages like "INTENSE SCRUTINY OF ANY DWELLING SPACE (HOME, OFFICE, HOTEL), VISITED BY PAMELA MARTIN, IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY ON-CALL!" to bolster their argument she was running a prostitution ring.

Palfrey maintains she ran a sexual fantasy business that was legal and that if any of the women who were working for her had sex, they did so in violation of her rules and without her knowledge.

In one newsletter,  she explains "adult service or fantasy escorts" command $200 an hour "because of the risky and sexual nature of these appointments. Obviously, the more liberal the booking or act, the more $ one makes." 

But she warned the girls they are "damned fools" if they think they can go on calls, "collect the $200 and 'just talk.'" "We do not sell social appointments, but adult fantasy ones here at Pamela Martin.  Anyone who believes otherwise, will find themselves unemployed."

In a clucking, sometimes sharply remonstrative third-person voice, Palfrey also issued directives on how to be a better escort.  Don't smoke before an "appointment" because "clients" complain. It's permissible to leave an appointment early if your "routine" ends before the allotted time, but try to stay for at least half of a 90-minute appointment. You can stay the entire time, if you like, but "there should be no feeling of obligation on your part to do so!" Palfrey counseled.

Employees' unfamiliarity with the Washington, D.C., area was a source of serious exasperation for Palfrey, the newsletters show. "The Agency recently hired a gal, who doesn't seem to have a clue in hell, as to how to navigate the roadways and streets of the metropolitan D.C. area," read one entry from 1994.

Partially blaming the girl's "poor sense of direction," Palfrey used the opportunity to chastise any of her women who had trouble answering the following questions:

"The streets of Washington, D.C. run 3 ways, i.e., east-west, north-south and diagonally. Which streets are designated alphabetically(?); numerically(?); have state names?" (In Washington, lettered streets run east to west; numbered streets run north to south; and streets named after states typically run diagonally.)

"North, South, East Capitol Streets and the Mall divide Washington, D.C. into 4 sections. (True or False.)" (True.)

"Of the streets designated by a letter, all letters are used except 3.  What 3 letters of the alphabet are not utilized, here?" (Trick question: Four letters never got their own streets. While Palfrey may have been recalling there are no X, Y or Z Streets in Washington, there is also no J.)

When Palfrey was in more charitable moods, she gave affirmative advice and tips. In another issue from 1994, she told her employees how to clean up their credit reports by asking credit agencies to remove negative information from their record.  In yet another, she tipped her girls off to the advantages of being a model at a hairstyle show ("free colorings and cuts").

In one issue, Palfrey even gave a product endorsement. "Victoria's Secret," she wrote, "is the only place a Pamela Martin girl shops."

May 1, 2007 in D.C. Madam Affair | Permalink | User Comments (110)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Now we will see how our pious, holy, family values congressmen have comported themselves.These times, and this century will rival that historical period of the industrial robber barons.
Prepare to vomit, America! The day of judgment is at hand.

Posted by: aeskylos | May 1, 2007 10:16:46 AM

Palfrey was running an illegal business, on which she most likely did not pay taxes. Her long winded "explanation" about why she is releasing the names of the johns makes no sense unless she hopes/thinks doing so will cause the powers that be to convince the prosecution to stop prosecuting her for fear of embarrassing more "important" men. Palfrey took a chance doing illegal acts and got snagged. And?????

Posted by: karen | May 1, 2007 10:23:03 AM

There is also no "B" street - it's Independence avenue south of the Mall and Constitution Avenue north of it.

Posted by: DC | May 1, 2007 10:27:46 AM

Smart business woman. You gotta admire that. As for the politicians who were stupid enough to use Madam Palfrey's 'service', well, as long as they haven't spent their careers promoting 'family values' or trying to 'restore dignity to public office' in response to the 'immoral Clinton years', let them deal with their wives while the rest of us stay out of the way. The hypocrites, on the other hand, should pay dearly for their sins.

Posted by: spleen | May 1, 2007 10:28:16 AM

Wanna make bets on which party they will belong to? You know, the family values party. Karma is such a sweet girl.

Posted by: GR | May 1, 2007 10:30:00 AM

Don't assume it was just congressmen, simply because congress was in session (when business was good, according to Ms. Palfrey's comments).

There are a lot more Congressional staffers, lobbiests, and of course Bush Administration officials than there are M.C.'s.

Posted by: Richard Green | May 1, 2007 10:37:12 AM

well...your sins will seek you out...and it stinks...i think we'll find that a man's human nature far transcends politcal boarders. but for those of you who did preach 'moral values' you make people who struggle to live by them look bad. we all make mistakes...but if there's a written record on your mistake...sorry but it's time to fess up. i think we'll find pretty much a 50/50 split in the political spectrum of who's on the call list. the human nature to lust is present in everyone...so it's going to be an embarrassing time for our leaders overall. bring back real values...not your soapbox, feel good, sound good stuff.

Posted by: ns | May 1, 2007 10:43:29 AM

I wonder how many times Billary will show up on that list.

Posted by: Anon | May 1, 2007 10:47:17 AM

she ran her business a lot better than the republicans are running the governments. She is on trial. how about putting some of her clients on trial?

Posted by: semiramis | May 1, 2007 10:49:42 AM

This is one smart lady.By going public with the names she is betting on the named people testifying on her behalf that they did not have sex,and therefore winning her case.

Posted by: Texas Bubba | May 1, 2007 10:58:16 AM

In response to ns: I agree with you overall, but my point about hypocrisy is that it takes a really corrupted soul to use one's power at the pulpit to actively preach the high road while taking the low (especially so specifically). In my opinion, the lies and hypocrisy are as bad as - if not worse than - the sin itself. As for your 50/50 prediction, sorry, but something tells me that the Republicans have, until the last election, felt they were invincible. There is a clear arrogance that has taken over the Republican party. Arrogance leads to carelessness. I would be willing to bet that most of the Dems looking for a little lovin on the side were a little wiser about covering their tracks.

Posted by: spleen | May 1, 2007 11:02:19 AM

I don't know why so many people are assuming her clients were primarily Republicans. She's operated in DC since 1993 -- that's more Clinton years than Bush years, isn't it?

BTW, if you look at who was arrested at Julie's NYC a couple years back, at least two men were prominent left-wing lawyers in Manhattan.

Posted by: Manny | May 1, 2007 11:16:54 AM

The importance of hypocrisy is overrated. Just because a fat smoker tells you that being fat and smoking is a bad idea doesn't mean it's a good idea. Traditional family values aren't false or wrong because people who espouse them struggle and fail like the rest of us.

Posted by: Leo | May 1, 2007 11:18:39 AM

Sophisticated? Victoria's Secret is so tacky!

Posted by: Marisa | May 1, 2007 11:24:15 AM

OMG! Sex in Washington D.C. ? So what else is new? It must be a slow day for media to feed at the same bowl as the supermarket tabloids. There must be something more important to write about, lets see; Iraq, gas prices, the economy, candiates for president, aids, world hunger, and so on and so on and so on.

Posted by: Jerry Grogan | May 1, 2007 11:26:03 AM

A woman could not be a women with out some dirty men around. It's OK for men to do the same thing but not women. Tell me WHY?

Posted by: Edie | May 1, 2007 11:27:12 AM

Yes, Leo, but the fat smoker who is CRITICAL of others who are fat smokers - who goes out of his way to encourage others to look down on 'struggling and failing' fat smokers...well...

"Hypocrisy is overrated." Wow. A perfect message for our children. Let's teach that in our schools and get America back on the right track.

Posted by: spleen | May 1, 2007 11:29:13 AM

Spleen, people always triumphantly pounce on the sexual misconduct of social conservatives as if that vindicates social liberalism. It doesn't.

Posted by: Leo | May 1, 2007 11:33:17 AM

Once again, Leo, it's not about the sexual misconduct. It's about the hypocrisy.

Posted by: spleen | May 1, 2007 11:36:34 AM

Just to clarify a comment above. Dick Morris is not a democrat. While he did work to help Bill Clinton win re-election, the vast majority of his clients are Republicans and conservatives.

Posted by: Jason | May 1, 2007 11:43:11 AM

Post a comment