BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Iraq War Takes Helicopters Needed for U.S. Disaster Missions
May 25, 2007 11:06 AM
While the Defense Department has pushed extra equipment to units in hurricane-prone states in part to compensate for what has been ordered to Iraq, an ABCNews.com investigation has found some Plains and western states have few if any helicopters on hand to respond quickly to a disaster.
And a backup system of sharing helicopters between states may not be as helpful as it's billed, experts say.
"We're on the ragged edge" in Nebraska, the state's adjutant general, Roger Lempke, told a panel of concerned U.S. lawmakers Thursday, describing the absence of helicopters in his state. Nebraska's contingent of Blackhawk helicopters are deployed in Iraq, leaving few aircraft for disaster relief missions at home.
The central and western United States faces a summer of predicted above-average wildfire activity and an unusually high spate of tornado activity.
Nebraska's situation is not unique. Arkansas National Guard can't count a single helicopter of its own in-state, although it is borrowing a few from neighbors. National Guards in Kansas, Texas and Montana report the vast majority of their helicopters are deployed out of state, mostly in Iraq and Afghanistan. Colorado's National Guard has deployed 17 of its 20 helicopters to Iraq, leaving three to help domestic missions like fighting wildfires.
In Iraq, the rise in ground attacks on U.S. troops has created a demand for helicopters to provide basic transportation. Fast, versatile and highly mobile -- those same qualities make them vital tools for disaster response. Helicopters can often reach disaster zones more quickly than ground transport and can go many places a truck or a humvee cannot reach. They can be outfitted to fight fires, evacuate casualties or move cargo or personnel.
When contacted by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, most state National Guard spokespeople said their equipment shortages would not hamper response to a disaster because they have agreements with neighboring states to borrow equipment.
But some disagree.
Such sharing agreements "are practically nullified" when multiple neighboring states lack the same vehicles or tools, said New Mexico adjutant general Melvyn Montano recently. "Where are they going to tap their equipment from if they've all been deployed?"
"In cases of natural disaster, an hour or two, or the 24 hours that it takes to fly a helicopter from New Jersey or Ohio or New York to Pennsylvania" could be the difference "between life and death," said Rep. Jay Carney, D-Pa., at yesterday's congressional hearing on National Guard readiness.
Not all state National Guard headquarters in the region contacted by ABCNews.com had bleak numbers. The Wyoming National Guard has eight Blackhawk helicopters on hand and more than 70 percent of its other authorized equipment, a spokeswoman told ABCNews.com. That is much higher than the national average, which currently hovers near 40 percent.
The Texas National Guard is also neatly outfitted, its lack of helicopters aside, from trucks to generators to night-vision goggles, its equipment levels were "comparable to redeployment," typically near 70 percent, according to a spokeswoman.
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross & the Investigative Team?
May 25, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (32)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
You evidently didn't keep up with foriegn policy over the last forty or fifty years. If we had a country friendly to us we overlooked their government. If they were unfriendly,we may have dropped a banana peel under one foot. JF Kennedy really got this going. Yes we supplied arms to Iran & Iraq. Trying to keep a balance between them. This in the hopes neither would win or neither would loose.
Documents taken pertained to a terrorist assessment from 2000, before George W. Bush was sworn in as president. These reports from the Clinton administration's response to terrorist threats. A secret assessment that may, according to some reports,be damaging to the former administration.
National Security Adviser Samuel Berger, who was convicted of taking classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, has agreed to turn in his license to practice law.
By giving up his law license, Berger avoids being cross-examined by the Board on Bar Counsel which may require further details of his theft.
GW never promised anyone he would find WMD. How convenient to slip them into Syria. Democrate talked this up for five years. We would have gone there regardless. Haven't heard of any plans that made sense for withdrawal.
Posted by: D. Wright | May 27, 2007 11:23:53 PM
"Deployed out of state - mostly in Iraq".
Well I guess Mr. Bush must think out of state, out of mind.
By the way, I seem to be missing the spare tire from the trunk of my car. Paging Mr. Bush....
Posted by: hdhouse | May 28, 2007 4:05:56 AM
Let's ignor them and they will go away. We are not fighting a country but an ideology. Most insurgents are from at least half a dozen other countries. This breeding ground began 10 years before we went to Iraq. Don't agree with everthing that has gone on. But don't be a talking head for King George Soros either. Guess you missed the story on National Security Adviser Samuel Berger and his monkeying with the records. Congress had the information on Iraq when they voted to go in and remove Saddam. We can't put him back and leave, word is he's deceased. Turned out to be a tougher task than we thought. Let's just go home. Democrats could make their opinions known on the campaign trail. It's costing at least 21 soldiers lives a month more but we need to exercise our first amendment. Job approval for congress is through the roof also.
You can't divorce religious belief and public service I've never detected any conflict between God's will and my political duty. If you violate one, you violate the other.
Jimmy Carter
Maybe morals don't have any place in politics.
Posted by: D. Wright | May 28, 2007 5:11:48 AM
Back to the subject of helicopters- There are large numbers of non-Guard /Military copters that are available for disaster relief. The states should make a deal with these commercial services.
Posted by: Lou | May 28, 2007 11:59:22 AM
No one complained when Clinton cut the defense budgetfor seven years and manpower by one third in the 90's. His whole plan was to have a citizen soldier. So he could say that he cut govt. spending and reduce the size of the govt. Depending on the State's Guard was Clinton's plan, not a smart one, but now we are having to deal with it, like it or not!
Posted by: GTP | May 29, 2007 5:54:40 PM
re The publication of forthcoming covert military operations in a time of war is treason.
Treason is illegally invading another country as was done In Iraq and is bein planned for Iran. When are you people going to stop the Treasonus deceit of this administration. You aren't fooling 75 per cent of Americans.
Posted by: iquin | May 29, 2007 9:24:24 PM
GEORGE W. BUSH IS DESTROYING THE U.$. MILITARY. HE'S ALSO BANKRUPTING THE COUNTRY AND MAKING AMERIKA A PARIAH ALL OVER THE WORLD.
NEVER HAVE AMERIKANS BEEN SO HATED AND DESPISED AS THEY ARE NOW. IT'S BOTH EMBARRASSING AND SOMEWHAT PERILOUS TO BE AN AMERIKAN ABROAD. WHEN I TRAVEL OUTSIDE THE COUNTRY, I NEVER SHOW MY PASSPORT UNLESS I HAVE TO... AND I DISGUISE MYSELF AS A CANADIAN BUSINESSMAN FROM EDMONTON. I EVEN WEAR CANADIAN T-SHIRTS AND CANADIAN LAPEL PINS.
THIS IS HOW BAD THINGS ARE FOR AMERIKANS ABROAD ROME IS BURNING IN IRAQ-NAM... WHILE OUR DRY DRUNK $OCIOPATHIC PRESIDENT RIDES HIS LITTLE BOY BIKE AROUND THE TEXASSS RANCH!
Posted by: GUY FOX | May 30, 2007 1:35:38 AM
This web site gives stats on the National Guard from 1982 through 1998 and the effect the Clinton White House had on their numbers.
http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/589_national_guard_summary.html
This one tells what unit was deployed and and from what state.
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/May2007/d20070523ngr.pdf
Posted by: Eduction Warrior | May 30, 2007 9:58:00 AM
The National Guard is financed by the states. They are suppose to be under the direction of the Governor. Now when returning National Guardsmen come back, the states have to pay them, but the US Govt has not given enough money to the states for this so those returning troops are broke, and will stay so for quite a while. The use of the National Guard in a foreign country is illegal.
But since another person has written about Clinton cutting the military, we are at Bush's whim, also since the Congress of the US is backing him. The National Guard should never have been used in this action, but oh, well. As I see it, our leaders in Congress have no back bone, and if the people of this country march against him they are deemed in the wrong. So we will fight to live another day.
Posted by: John | May 30, 2007 8:29:19 PM
Here's a thought, make
more helicopters. We can't
go on whining for the next 50 years that assets we need for stateside disasters-of-the-week are being used to combat radical fascist Islamists.
Posted by: oliverbcb | Jun 6, 2007 9:06:57 PM
"GEORGE W. BUSH IS DESTROYING THE U.$. MILITARY. HE'S ALSO BANKRUPTING THE COUNTRY AND MAKING AMERIKA A PARIAH ALL OVER THE WORLD."
_____________________________
Lyndon Johnson took out Social Security and paid for the Vietnam war and your bitching about Iraq.
Posted by: D. Wright | Jun 11, 2007 6:28:33 PM
In my opinion, the demagoguery of the great former President Jimmy Carter by the illegal President currently occupying the oval office George Bush and his corrupt and deceitful administration who in my opinion are attemping to place the American people under the rule of an oligarchy form of government in which a few persons hold the ruling power is pure despotism. In my opinion, President Carter who won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 has rightly criticized Bush for his inadequecy and dealings as the President of the United States in an array of statements and accounts conducted by this current Bush administration. The former President Carter has been quoted as saying : “ this Bush administration is had the worst adverse effect on the nation and the world in history”. And he went on and explained that Bush had overseen an “overt reversal of America’s basic valves”.
This out right attack by Bush and his administration that Carter is irrlevant is to me demagoguery at its worst. For Bush and his administration to slander a former President of the United States in this manner is repugnant and disrespectful in my opinion, and it is unamerican for anyone to denounce a person of such high morals, great intellect, and a person who has shown the world his devotion to world peace throughout his career and his love for this country and his dedication to the service of humanity. Former President Carter when compare to Bush on any level of intellect, morality, or place in history is quite self explanatory. Bush is the son of a former President who rode the coattails of his father’s political might to become the Governor of Texas. Bush used his Governorship and the help of his father and brother in his quest for the Presidency of the United States. In my opinion Bush did not win the office of the President. He with the help of the elite rich, powerful, greedy, and corrupt individuals and corporations who form the despot Republican Party of the United States stole the Presidency by corruption, fraud, and abuse of the U.S. election laws and the down right deceptions at the voting place thoughout the country. This election process was twarted by the United States Supreme Court which was controlled by the Republicans when they in affect appointed Bush to become President. The comparison between Bush and Carter is like trying to compare a grain of sand with the vastness of the cosmos, there is no comparison. Bush who for the better part of his pre-politician existence was a wild egoist individual who often times bragged about his escapades of drinking and chasing after pretty women. There have been reports of him sniffing cocaine and being caught for driving under the influnce of alcohol as well as being AWOL from military duty. Of course all these things have just been reported and as of this date none have been substantiated or proven, but does cast a shadow over his over all worthiest as an individual.
Comparing former President Carter to the current President Bush is almost laughable if not for the position they are or were in. The former President Carter has recieved the Nobel Peace Prize, an a remarkable record in service to his country and to the world, a President of the United States, a nuclear physics, a carpenter, a poet, and many other thing that are to numerous to list in this short article. Former President Carter’s recent comments concerning the Iraq war being a “major tragedy” hit the nail on the head and was jusified in saying so. These despot Republicans in my opinion are aborminable, loyal, blind, and apparently subservient to Bush and his administration. This Bush administration and his Republican coharts has plunged this country in the biggest mess in history. The press and the TV talking heads is trying to cast all the focus onto Prime Minster Blair of Great Britain to minimize the role of the Bush administration part in the Iraq war. George Bush the “Decider” and his Republican coharts are using as one of their defenses, is to be more correct in their actions because the world thinks because Great Britain is backing them when in reality Great Britain has a vested interest in Iraq going back many years and that interest is the same as the United States, oil, oil, oil..... and that is what this war is about plain and simple. Anyway anyone twist the facts it is these elite, rich, and power hungry despots Republicans and their coharts who will go to any extreme to justify their greedy thrist for power and the almighty dollar. President Carter is right that the combination of Bush and Blair giving their support to this tragedy in Iraq has strengthened in efforts, and has made opposition less effective and has prolonged this war and increased the tragdy that has resulted. Bush and his administration’s environmental policies are quite distrubing faith-based initiative funding has made a mockery of the environmental issues and separation of church and state. These U.S. Congresspersons that are currently serving in Congress sure are not doing much to hold this administration’s feet to the fire in my opinion, and it sure is nice and past time for someone to speak out and tell the truth about the going on in Washington D.C. and within this corrupt Bush administration.
This Bush administration has taken this country in my opinion, on a radical departure from all previous administrations policies by the endorsement of the concept of pre-emptive strike against another country, and has usurp the power of Congress to declare war in violation of the U.S. Constitution in my opinion. Former President Carter has honestly and rightly criticized Bush and his administration for having a “zero peace talks” in Israel and have “ abandoned or directly refuted” every negotiated nuclear arms agreement, as well as evironmental efforts by other President.
It seems this Bush administration policies are quite different than President Carter’s administration by currently allocating funds to religious institutions, even those that channel those funds exclusively to their own particular group of believers in a particular religion. It seems to me that Bush as President does not honor the premise that all prevously elected Presidents have honored that of separation of church and state. Back in the 1970’s when Carter was President he proposed a ten year program that would eliminate this country’s need for foreign energy supply and dependence. If this nation and the American people had the foresight back then to implement this ten year program we would not be in this terrible mess we’re in today depending on people that hate us to provide us with energy such as gas and oil. I salute former President Carter far all his has done for America and the world. He is a great man, and much much more, and George Bush the “Decider” can’t hold a candle to him, or for that matter every rise to the greatness of Jimmy Carter. William in Alabama.
*** ( This Material herein above may be published, broadcast, rewitten, or redistributed by anyone who so desires )***
Posted by: william | Jun 12, 2007 7:48:53 AM
Post a comment
