BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Document: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban
June 06, 2007 6:00 PM
NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces, in what the officials say is a dramatic escalation of Iran's proxy war against the United States and Great Britain.
"It is inconceivable that it is anyone other than the Iranian government that's doing it," said former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant.
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stopped short earlier this week of blaming Iran, saying the U.S. did not have evidence "of the involvement of the Iranian government in support of the Taliban."
But an analysis by a senior coalition official, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, concludes there is clear evidence of Iran's involvement.
"This is part of a considered policy," says the analysis, "rather than the result of low-level corruption and weapons smuggling."
Iran and the Taliban had been fierce enemies when the Taliban was in power in Afghanistan, and their apparent collaboration came as a surprise to some in the intelligence community.
"I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute, "even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy."
The coalition analysis says munitions recovered in two Iranian convoys, on April 11 and May 3, had "clear indications that they originated in Iran. Some were identical to Iranian supplied goods previously discovered in Iraq."
The April convoy was tracked from Iran into Helmand province and led a fierce firefight that destroyed one vehicle, according to the official analysis. A second vehicle was reportedly found to contain small arms ammunition, mortar rounds and more than 650 pounds of C4 demolition charges.
A second convoy of two vehicles was spotted on May 3 and led to the capture of five occupants and the seizure of RPG-7mm rockets and more than 1,000 pounds of C4, the analysis says.
Also among the munitions are components for the lethal EFPs, or explosive formed projectiles, the roadside bombs that U.S. officials say Iran has provided to Iraqi insurgents with deadly results.
"These clearly have the hallmarks of the Iranian Revolution Guards' Quds force," said Jones.
The coalition diplomatic message says the demolition charges "contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area."
"We believe these intercepted munitions are part of a much bigger flow of support from Iran to the Taliban," the message says.
The Taliban receives larger supplies of weapons through profits from opium dealing, officials say, but the Iranian presence could be significant.
"It means the insurgency in Afghanistan is likely to be prolonged," said Jones. "It would be a much more potent force."
June 6, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (907)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
so, Iran is supplying sophosticated weapons to Afghanistan....and the US do not fly F-18's and F15's and laser-guided missiles...!
Be real please!
Posted by: max2424 | Jun 6, 2007 6:49:01 PM
Please don't become part of the new neo con push for a new war in Iran. Check and double check your sources. We had far too much of the media serving as the mouthpiece for this administration leading up to the Iraq war. We don't need another media encouraged disaster.
Here's a fact to consider: the Iranian government is Shi'a. The Taliban are Sunni - hard core Sunnis. These people do not have a common cause. They have been at odds with each other since the 7th century.
Please check your sources!!
Posted by: John Hubers | Jun 6, 2007 6:53:49 PM
max2424 don't be silly. If the Iranians would use their sophisicated weapons against the US in the open battlefield...they would be destroyed. It's tough to fight an enemy that won't declare war against you. The Iranian's lie and then fund terrorists and they know that until we have hard evidence against them...there is not much we can do to retaliate. That is why they are so sneeky.
Posted by: Chris | Jun 6, 2007 6:55:17 PM
Doesnt anyone remember that we supplied Iraq during its war with Iran? That when we went back we left a lot of explosives ungarded after we found them. "We have seen the enemy and they is us".
Posted by: Tim Simpson | Jun 6, 2007 6:58:19 PM
Remember the saying "The enemy of my enemy is my friend"
Posted by: steve salter | Jun 6, 2007 7:02:52 PM
As soon as I see this reported by a reputable source that is not a member of the United States corporate media, I'll start believing it. ABC News, like the rest of the American media, helped the Bush Administration lie us into the quagmire in Iraq. The RAND Corporation, who they quote so freely, is run by people who stand to make BILLIONS off of the next war that we are lied into. Let me hear this from someone who doesn't stand to make a profit off of the next military misadventure.
Posted by: Tom | Jun 6, 2007 7:08:00 PM
The way this story is written, it gives absolute authority to the analysis of one senior coalition official. (unnamed!)
His analysis may be dead on, but to present one unknown official's opinion as absolute truth without providing the evidence behind his analysis is deceptive reporting.
I find it perfectly plausible that the Iranian government may be behind these shipments, (it also could be someone at a lower level or smugglers,) but to write this story in the somewhat sensationalist way you did offers alot more weight (without evidence) than this report should receive.
If the report has evidence that the Iranian government is behind it, then, sure, make that headline, but hiding behind "Report says" and analysis of unnamed official without evidence should no longer be acceptable reporting in this country.
Not after similar reporting contributed to the war in Iraq.
Posted by: mikevotes | Jun 6, 2007 7:09:46 PM
Read the article three or four times. You will see that both sources are SPECULATING that the Iranian government is inolved. COMPLETELY SPECULATING. So why does ABCNEWS say Iran was caught 'red handed'? Why is this disinformation being used on the American public? For what purpose are we being lied to? Why are the powers that be trying so hard to get another diastrous war started?
Posted by: Eric | Jun 6, 2007 7:19:27 PM
So.... the secret is out huh?I guess the small army that we "indirectly" fund against Iran isn't a big problem huh?
Lets look at history....
We supplied the afgans during the Afgan-Russia war. Now they are using that weapons against us.
We helped the Iraqis during the Iraq Iran war. Now they are using that weapons against us.
We supplied funds to overthrough governments. Now those people and govt. are against us.
So on and so on.... Tell me who is spreading terrorism... us or them?
I guess this is what our elders mean when they say "Your digging your own Ditch" Hmmmm...
Posted by: the one who sees | Jun 6, 2007 7:20:22 PM
Mr. Hubers,
Even your own US government (whose current policies you seem to have contempt for) has made deals with devils to protect more pressing politcal priorities and goals. "The enemy of my enemy is also my friend."
Have you ever pointed out to anyone that the United States in the past provided assistance to Bin Laden and Saddam? If so, then you are well aware of such tactics and are likely too wrapped up in your own political viewpoint to consider the story on the merits of the facts which have been cited.
"Please check your souces!!"?
Alas, if only you had posted your sage advice to Dan Rather before it was too late.
It's cute that you think it matters.
Also, if you know anything about Mr. Richard Clarke, you'll know he is no fan of the current administration or it's foreign policies.
Posted by: Tyler Durden | Jun 6, 2007 7:20:37 PM
If you don't think Iran is supplying anything to anyone that opposes the US, you live in a dream world. Get real.
Posted by: Robert Hicks | Jun 6, 2007 7:21:04 PM
This message board is evidence of the chit chat that will occur among liberals after Iran supplies terrorists with a nuclear weapon that goes off in a U.S. port city.
"We really don't know who's to blame" the liberals will whine.
"After all, we brought it on ourselves because we are so unkind to other people in the world" the liberals will add.
It's time to use some bunker busters on Iranian nuclear sites. We need to slow down this bunch of renegades.
Posted by: Robert L. Barney | Jun 6, 2007 7:21:36 PM
Here's what it's come to:
The conservatives see a liberal media, and the bias that comes with it, and the liberals see a 'corporate media' and think they're in league with the Bush Administration.
Meanwhile - what's the truth? Let me ask all of you this: Do you honestly think that Iran's government isn't doing this? This has been Iran's behavior since 1979. When haven't they been supplying arms to someone? This hasn't changed whether the administration has been Republican or Democrat.
At what point is taking on Iran the right thing to do instead of liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat?
How many more have to die - do we wait until Iran takes out Israel w/a nuke?
Posted by: Brian | Jun 6, 2007 7:21:47 PM
To the utopians and Bush-haters who believe Iran is not a threat and not supplying arms; please, WAKE UP! Hating Bush is one thing, but closing your eyes is another.
Iran won't supply to the Taliban because they are Shiite and the Taliban are Sunni? Iran is supplying the Sunni resistance in Iraq too! Why? Simple - the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Once we are gone, they can control the Taliban who wouldn't be worth spit if not for their help. They want to be the super-power in the Mid-East and the world and they'll do anything to accomplish it.
They didn't do anything to us so why should we bother them? Germany and Italy didn't do anything to us either. Nor did Bosnia. Didn't stop us then. The truth is we must stop them before they become too entrenched and then decide to attack Israel and steal the oil of Iraq and other Gulf states. Think oil is expensive now? How about $200 a barrel meaning $10 a gallon!?
WAKE UP! We must draw a LITERAL line in the sand!
Posted by: boB | Jun 6, 2007 7:23:14 PM
"Red-handed" in Babylon,
or, "China Bats Last"
Is "the U.S.", the world's biggest arms dealer, also determined to be the planet's ONLY source for implements of self-defense?
How it looks to me, remembering all the blabla about U.S. "daisycutters" and bunker-busters, and shock and awe, is that anything the Afghanis can get hold of to throw back at "the U.S." is just A-OK.
It's not a crime to fight back against Cheney-Bush. On the contrary: it's starting to look kind of heroic.
Something tells me the next target of neo-con weapons-wrath will be ... Russia.
Posted by: @T | Jun 6, 2007 7:23:18 PM
just look at the iranian presidents comments about israel. "wiped-off the map" "its destruction is nearing".
these are not comments of a nation seeking nuclear energy, but nuclear bombs!
Bush its time to go in n start the bombing! THE WHOLE USA is behind you.
Posted by: Jeff Pimple | Jun 6, 2007 7:23:43 PM
THESE PEOPLE, even though they don't have a common relgious cause (sunni/shiit3), they have a very COMMON cause - to wipe out the USA and the WEST
Posted by: ripetid | Jun 6, 2007 7:24:15 PM
If not from Iran, Syria, or North Korea, where else could this be coming from?
Mordor?
Only complete morons could so flippantly dismiss the Iranian threat.
(Not the people of Iran but the regime in power there)
Time for some JDAAMS in Iran?
Posted by: Roy R | Jun 6, 2007 7:24:24 PM
It amazes me how quick people are to bash the current administration and cry fowl on the war. You clowns just don't get the fact that these people want all of us DEAD. They hate our way of life, they hate our democracy, they hate our religious beliefs. Don't ever forget the fact that these radical muslim regimes that you so defend, would not think one second about cutting your throat...........and the throat's of all in your family.
Posted by: Jugdish | Jun 6, 2007 7:25:07 PM
This story is about as true as all the other stories that have reported the success of the US military within Iraq since Sadam was removed from power. You liberals are funny. You have to deny any evidence that suggests otherwise.
Besides, the US should have already taken out the Iranian leadership. As someone who has lived in Iran for the last 3 years, the new neo con's in Iran want it anyway.
Posted by: Chad Splat | Jun 6, 2007 7:25:35 PM
Post a comment
