BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Troopergate Probe OK, AK Supremes Say
- Todd Palin Pushed Firing for Years, Probe Told
- Let's Get Ready to Rumble!
- Todd Speaks! (Kind of)
- Palin Aides to Testify
- Troopergate Heads to High Court
- Troopergate Suits Tossed
- Another Private Palin Email Account?
- Probe Challenges Head to Court
- Troopergate Suit "Political, Not Legal," Lawmakers Charge
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
'Mystery' Money Groups Hide Money Trail, Watchdog Group Says
June 25, 2007 11:29 AM
As Congress cracks down on lobbyist loopholes, it's hard to imagine a single dollar of a political contribution could still slip into the system anonymously.
Yet hundreds of thousands do, says the political money watchdog Center for Responsive Politics, through what it says is a loophole in need of closing.
Under current rules, House and Senate lawmakers can create a particular type of campaign finance organization to take in money from lobbyists, special interests and other major donors -- up to $5,000 per contributor per year -- and spread that money to the campaign coffers of other lawmakers.
They are known as leadership political action committees. And unlike other money-raising organizations, they don't have to tell the public which lawmaker controls them, allowing many to obscure the path of potentially influential cash into federal politics.
Candidates "raise money in Washington for their leadership PAC, and they raise money at home for their campaign," campaign finance expert Brett Kappel told the Blotter on ABCNews.com. "Many would much prefer their constituents at home never know they had a leadership PAC." Much of the money raised for leadership PACs comes from lobbyists, Kappel said.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
By giving chunks of that money to their fellow House and Senate members, "ambitious lawmakers can gain clout among their colleagues and boost their bids for leadership posts or committee chairmanships," CRP notes on its Web site, OpenSecrets.org. They can also "hire additional staff -- sometimes even family members," with the money, the group said.
Such was the case with likely GOP presidential hopeful and ex-Sen. Fred Thompson, whose leadership PAC paid out nearly $180,000 to his son Daniel before it was shut down earlier this year.
Thompson made no secret that he controlled the group. He named it the "Fred D. Thompson PAC."
But others don't. In the 2006 election cycle, 35 anonymous leadership PACs raised more than $1.2 million, without a single mention in a press release or public filing of the lawmaker which controlled them.
If Congress approves a proposed bill by Rep. Walter B. Jones, R-N.C., the groups would be required to report which lawmaker controls them.
Until then, CRP has enlisted the public's help in tracking down the lawmakers which control the mystery organizations, in what they've dubbed their "Mystery PAC" effort.
So far, private citizens, reporters and other government watchdog groups have helped identify the lawmakers behind 10 of the anonymous leadership PACs, CRP reports on its Web site.
"This has already been a success as far as we're concerned," said CRP president Sheila Krumholz of the group's effort.
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
June 25, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (2)
Why isnt anyone reading and commenting on this? If all of congress and the senate are stealing america blind it wont MATTER who we elect unless they clear both out not to mention reworking the FBI, CIA, DEA and FDA!
Posted by: Jennifer | Jun 26, 2007 11:05:37 AM
What happened to the Public Database that Obama and Frist got passed last year in summer of 2006 to list where/what of the “pork barrel” money is being spent and by whom? Why can’t all of the money used for political purposes / lobbying be listed on such a database as part of public records?
Posted by: dreek53 | Jun 27, 2007 1:40:55 PM
Post a comment
