BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
New Video of Plane Crashes; $63 Million Plane 0 for 49 in Tests
June 12, 2007 3:24 PM
Members of Congress watched videos today of what they got for $63 million spent on an experimental aircraft the military did not want: repeated crashes and significant failures.
Video: Watch Congress' $63 Million Investment Crash
The plane, designed to take off like a helicopter and then fly at high speed, failed to remain in the air for more than a few seconds in 49 separate tests last year, according to John Kinzer of the Office of Naval Research.
"None of these attempts resulted in controlled hover for more than a few seconds," Kinzer told members of the House Committee on Science and Technology.
Photos: See the Aircraft That Can't Fly
See the San Diego Union Tribune Cartoon
The videos played for Congress today show the plane's prototype lifting off and then crashing within a second or two.
"The good news is that when it crashes, it only crashed from a foot or two off the ground," said subcommittee Chairman Brad Miller, D-N.C..
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Kinzer told Congress the Navy had no plans to extend the testing when current funds run out at the end of the year, even though Congress has appropriated another $6 million.
Since 1986, Pentagon analysts have consistently rejected the aircraft design as "technically flawed," but Congress has continued to pour money into the project.
Congressman Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., has led the effort on behalf of a hometown company, DuPont Aerospace.
In testimony today, Hunter said he considered the investment "prudent from a financial and risk perspective."
"One would be hard pressed to argue that a technology that could deliver greater speed and greater stealth capabilities has no military utility and is not worth some investment," Hunter said.
Hunter has received at least $36,000 in campaign contributions from the owner of the company, Anthony DuPont. Both men deny the contributions are connected to Hunter's continued support for the aircraft project.
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
June 12, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (52)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Duncan Hunter takes $36K from the President of the company building this plane, but says continued support6 for thius piece of junk has nothing to do with him supporting the company of the man investing $36k for his campaign! And the Navy doesn't want it!
Posted by: Warren B | Jun 12, 2007 4:15:06 PM
don't we already have an airplane like this: Harrier?
Posted by: don | Jun 12, 2007 4:16:45 PM
As a past operational test engineer for the Air Force - this is not the first or last "doomed-to-fail" pork-barrel project I've seen hawked by a senator or congressmen to strictly benefit some local industry. Congressman Duncan Hunter, R-Calif. you should apologize and then resign. You are not a patroit but instead a greedy enemy of the state.
Posted by: Bill | Jun 12, 2007 4:20:20 PM
No we dont, the harrier is a british plane
Posted by: Juan | Jun 12, 2007 4:23:50 PM
Your headline is very misleading. This was a GOP controlled congressional pork/kickback/boondoggle, championed by Republican congressmen. Don't indict the whole current branch of congress for past GOP crimes.
Posted by: Terrence Nicholson | Jun 12, 2007 4:28:23 PM
The Harrier is British - but I believe the Marines utilize it in their operations
Gene
Posted by: Gene | Jun 12, 2007 4:30:06 PM
Hmmmm...
There is a "-R" behind the Congressman name. I think that means he is a Republican. And also, aren't most of the Congressmen incumbents.
Conclusion: They are watching videos of what they got for $63 million.
Posted by: Frank | Jun 12, 2007 4:39:37 PM
It was never meant to fly. It's a cover for a black project. This is how they do it. You will never see your money again.
Posted by: Proud American Liberal | Jun 12, 2007 4:42:22 PM
Why don't we just pay the congressman $36,000 and no one says anything and then he doesn't screw us out of $6 million. It might be the best money the US ever spent.
Posted by: ROB | Jun 12, 2007 4:42:58 PM
We tend to blame our senators and representatives for these types of projects. But who keeps electing them.....
Posted by: Mike | Jun 12, 2007 4:45:30 PM
A Republican behind it all... why am I not surprised? And speaking of fiscal irresponsibility.... this congressman lobbied for the company to build this plane for 63 million....and all he got was 36k??? Honestly, I think we could take up a collection, raise 50k, get someone elected who would work for us, and save 63 million....
Posted by: normanx | Jun 12, 2007 5:07:33 PM
A US manufacturer has the license to manufacture the Harrier.
This thing looks like a pig that can't fly. Those thick wings couldn't go more than 400 knots.
Posted by: Bob | Jun 12, 2007 5:08:46 PM
Yes, the United States Marine Corps uses the AV8-B Harrier, perhaps this project is about a transport "heliplane", not a combat like the Harrier. The nearest aircraft to that description would be the V-22 and variants, which is pretty efficient. Just slower than the "expected" speed of that thing but -hey, the V-22 Osprey flies!
Posted by: Thierry | Jun 12, 2007 5:19:42 PM
Just think the money wasted on this plane might have been used to get our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan the equipment they truly need. Shame on
Congressman Hunter. Now can you claim to support our troops when you waste money like this on something the military tells you they don't want? Explain that to my son and his fellow soldiers.
Posted by: Taldan | Jun 12, 2007 6:03:38 PM
This cracks me up. I work for a legitimate Disabled Veteran Owned Business and wrote Mr. Hunter about the inequities in government contracting (the company I work for is a small company)and for some helpt/guidance for him to take to Capitol Hill. Needless to say I never received a response. I guess the fact I have not provided at least $36,000 in money to his campaign says that until I do, there is no fair representation. If I had that much marketing money to spend on one person I doubt we would be a small business. Thanks politicians for showing your true side!
Posted by: steve | Jun 12, 2007 6:25:27 PM
ABC has politicized the issue but this is not limited to the Republican or Democrat party! Earmarks are an institutionalized "right" that our "leaders" utilize to bilk us out of billions every year. Look it up!
The President (yes, an "evil Republican") called for either the elimination of earmarks or transparency into the process. However, this has been resisted by almost ALL members of Congress (both sides) because they have never been held accountable for their actions.
Posted by: rodrigo | Jun 12, 2007 6:30:23 PM
A previous post indicated this as cover for a "Black Ops" project - good call they must be overstocked on $400 toilet seats.
Posted by: Gene | Jun 12, 2007 7:30:54 PM
As an aeronautical engineer I can look at this "project" just for a few minutes - configuration and a few other details - to
identify it as a hoax. Tax payer have been
taken on a ride with the assistance of a
congressman! Is this not this Hunter guy
who wants to run for president?
Posted by: Peter | Jun 12, 2007 7:30:57 PM
$63 million over 20 years is nothing compared to Hunter's other boondoggles.
What about that "60 mph boat" he is so proud of or the Affordable Weapon that just got canceled for not meeting cost and performance objectives? Both are managed by Titan (now L3), a company that pleaded guilty to three felony international bribery charges and agreed to pay a record $28.5 million in 2005. Google Titan and Abu Ghraib for a nice character reference. HUNDREDS of millions have been earmarked for those programs.
I hold you SoCal residents accountable for continuing to elect these crooks (Cunningham, Hunter, Cox, Rohrabacher, Feinstein, etc.)! Quit bitching about Dupont and start voting the REAL problems out of office!
Posted by: FastEdd | Jun 12, 2007 9:05:13 PM
Political pork goes across party lines and we pick up the tab. There are no bounds to the greed and incompetence of congress in nearly all areas. Public financing of campaigns and term limits are the only answer out of this horrible situation.
Posted by: remoran | Jun 12, 2007 9:50:00 PM
Post a comment
