BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
ALERT: A New Message From Osama Bin Laden Is on the Way
Legal Powerhouse Olson Will Take W.Va. Court Case to SCOTUS
Panel OKs "Boot Camp" Bill
Oil Giants to Appear Before Congress
Bush Signs CNMI Immigration Bill into Law
Embattled Official Defends Pricey Hand Towels
Shock and Awe on M Street
WEWS Cleveland: Natural Gas Boom Has Hidden Danger
Lobbyists Making Even More Money Than Ever
Thanks to You, the Blotter Marks Second Year With More Success
White House Ousts Top Official Accused of Political Favoritism
Second Trial for Boeing Whistleblower
Undercover Investigation: One-Stop Shopping for Steroids
Report: U.S. Anti-Corruption Efforts Looking Good (in Iraq)
CIA Tape Probes, Still Chugging Along
Ex-KBR Workers to Testify on Contract Fraud
McCain Aided Arizona Businessman
Duke Briber Hasn't Made Bail, Judge Says
Rezko out on Bail
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
Congress Serves Up 9/11 Bill with Pork Stuffing
July 27, 2007 3:24 PM
Who says the age of the earmark is over?
Democrats swept into power on Capitol Hill last November promising to curb earmarks -- those one-line provisions federal legislators slip into bills to funnel money to their pet projects.
But earmarks have continued to thrive. Lawmakers of all stripes have requested an eye-popping 32,000 this year, according to House Appropriations Chairman David M. Obey, D-Wisc. And they're popping up in unlikely, even daring, places.
Senior lawmakers and their colleagues managed to slip earmarks into the landmark Sept. 11 security bill, which the Senate approved late last night.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Buried in the legislation, which is not a spending bill, Congressional Quarterly found language diverting $18 million for homeland security-related research at three universities: Mississippi's Tougaloo College, championed by House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.; New York's Long Island University, thanks to House Homeland Security Committee ranking member Peter D. King, R-N.Y.; and the University of Connecticut, pushed by Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ranking member Joe Lieberman, I-Conn.
The schools will be part of a "National Transportation Security Center of Excellence" consortium. The bill directs the schools to study transportation security and develop training methods for "transportation employees and transportation professionals."
"We know lawmakers like to make sure their schools are well-endowed, but they shouldn't be doing it with taxpayer funds," said Keith Ashdown of the Washington, D.C.-based watchdog, Taxpayers for Common Sense. "If there's any bill that should be sacrosanct from earmarking, it's a homeland security bill. This worries us."
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
July 27, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (19)
I'm badly disgusted with current spending, unfulfilled promises that are forgotten before the ballot ink is dry, and incumbents that flip and flop like politicians without money. Screwemall. It's my country, my money, and I want em both back. I'll never vote for another incumbent. They must go.
Posted by: Tar and Feathers | Jul 27, 2007 4:31:08 PM
I agree tar and feathers. Now lets see if we can get others to do the same.
Posted by: claude westervelt | Jul 27, 2007 5:23:02 PM
Our leaders are clearly corrupt. Rather than being upfront with their pork, they hide it in important legislation. The president adds to the problem by just signing away. We need to replace them all. I will never vote for a sitting legislator again. Out with them all.
Posted by: Don | Jul 27, 2007 5:31:03 PM
Oh My goodness. ABC News just put out a story that was somewhat critical of Democrats.
Stop the presses.
Posted by: Dan Green | Jul 27, 2007 5:43:14 PM
It's essential to get Congress to pass mandatory disclosure of who sponsored ear-marks, in order to link ear-marks to campaign contributions and lobbying activities. That will allow the ethics committee's and federal investigators to investigate potential improprieties. Any member of Congress who doesn't support mandatory disclosure of ear-marks should be voted out of office!
Posted by: Chris Baker | Jul 27, 2007 9:01:05 PM
Disgusting! I too will not vote for any encumbants!
Posted by: AC | Jul 28, 2007 3:55:22 PM
Critical of Democrats? Please. You've managed to name one Southern Democrat, one Republican, and Lieberman. Not a true Democrat in the bunch.
Posted by: stinger | Jul 28, 2007 7:23:13 PM
I wish you would quit living your lives vicariously watching Faux News. I'm a democrat. If you have read my thoughts you know I don't blindly defend democrats. I don't see a worthwhile leader in ether party. This is more data to support my contention playing party politics is a continuation of the problem. Both parties do a great job of letting Americans down. Ether party will secure our boarder. They sell America jobs out. They see their job as buying off contributors for the next election. Hilary tops the list in contributions from the health care industrial complex.Fienstien's husband as cut a fat hog from defense contracts. See, liberal try to be balanced.
Posted by: Mike Johnson | Jul 28, 2007 11:57:40 PM
All Pork Stuffing should be made public befoe the presidential election. Democracts and known to use such methods as well as Republicans to buy votes. The Democracts claim to be reformers on Congress.
The public needs to know so that such information will be posted in the media during election time.
Posted by: Syl | Jul 29, 2007 6:51:59 AM
Congress is totally irresponsible, and continues to demonstrate their lack of fiscal responsibility, continues to fail to correct the excesses of the judicial system, and continues to give themselves raises, while denying raises to citizens.
Both political parties serve their own interests, and not the interests of the citizens.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | Jul 30, 2007 10:54:59 AM
It's true - both Republicans and Democrats are disappointing to me. We need to make two immediate changes in Washington. First, kick out all the lobbyists and special interest groups, and second, FORCE congress and the senate to pass term limits for themselves like they have for every other branch of local, state and federal government.
Posted by: Dave F | Jul 30, 2007 11:44:49 AM
$18 million for homeland security-related research at three universities is bathering too much.
Educational research grant to university is subject to university's accounts and audit process.
Who will question over $7.00 Billion gone for WTC reconstruction.
Tallest Building in World of UAE costs $1.00 B only.
Posted by: Hector | Jul 31, 2007 2:43:53 AM
Dems, or Reps.......it doesn't matter. Politics opens the door for coruption. I read of a pork project years ago, where 6 figures was awarded to some university for the purpose of studying how fast ketchup flows out of a bottle. There is no difference between the politician that slips the waste through via piggy-backing or disguising as something else......and someone like Ted Stevens.
Posted by: Dave | Jul 31, 2007 4:32:51 PM
Gee, I agree with Tar 'n Feathers, AC, Don, and Claude. So that's five of us. Who we gonna' vote for?
Posted by: JeanClaudeNeuf | Aug 1, 2007 11:32:00 AM
Replace all Capital Hill's seat warmers. A friend of mine new to the Hill told me that on average, each member spends 17 days out of the month doing the people's (us), work and the rest making appearances to stock the coffers for the next election.
VOTE THEM ALL OUT and start fresh!
Posted by: Tom A | Aug 2, 2007 10:58:09 AM
I agree. There's not a dime worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats anymore. They are all corrupt and out to line their own pockets. We desperately need to resolve to send them home, start over and hold them responsible for their votes.... Will we do that? If we don't we are all lost.
Posted by: Jim Scott | Aug 3, 2007 12:00:48 PM
Vote tham all out!
Posted by: Jim Scott | Aug 3, 2007 12:02:26 PM
Vote them all out ? Removing the incumbents without changing the system will make matters worse. New (and inexperienced) members of Congress will be easy pickings for the experienced lobbyists with their free "information" and for the entrenched bureaucrats who control the information and the operation of the government.
Posted by: Dick Hesse | Aug 7, 2007 3:20:55 PM
All of you declaring the Democrats as bad as Republicans are full of dodo. Yeah, no one is perfect. Even if any one of you were elected, you would have preferences and favorite projects and positions that others would disagree with. Lets weigh the positions/projects of each candidate with respect to their positive impact on the poor, the marginal citizens of this country, and on racial, gender, sexual, and class justice and equality. Keeping in mind PEACE, healthcare, security, and economic stability. We are all TOO selfish, too bigoted, too closed minded.
James T. Brown
Posted by: Dr. James T. Brown | Aug 9, 2007 1:29:25 PM
Post a comment
