The Nuclear Loophole: U.S. Still at Risk

July 20, 2007 6:24 PM

Brian Ross Reports:

Thenuclearloo_mn Despite the more than $2 billion spent by the Department of Homeland Security on radiation detection devices, leading scientists tell ABC News the country remains wide open to terrorists who might try to smuggle nuclear material into the country.

In a familiar scene at the port of Los Angeles today, senior U.S. officials demonstrated yet another new, expensive machine that supposedly can detect nuclear material hidden in shipping containers.

The DHS has claimed this device is 95 percent accurate, and today Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff had high praise for it.

Photos Nuclear Material Bypasses Radiation Detection Devices at U.S. Ports in 2002

"This is great," he said. "This is the wave of the future."

Despite Chertoff's praise, a government investigation by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) concluded the new machines "fell far short of the 95 percent level of performance."

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

At best, the GAO found the machines were 45 percent accurate, sometimes as low as only 17 percent accurate.

"It is very frustrating when we pour billions of dollars into our homeland security, and yet we see so many of those dollars being wasted," Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, which has been a key oversight committee for the radiation detector program, said.

That's why Congress now wants a new round of tests before they will allow any more money to be spent on the system.

"Today we learned that in fact it is riddled with inefficiencies that could in fact make it possible for al Qaeda to bring a nuclear bomb into a post in the United States," Congressman Ed Markey, D-Mass., said.

It has been five years since ABC News first demonstrated the ease with which uranium, shielded in lead pipes, could be smuggled into the country in a shipping container, past supposedly state-of-the-art detection machines.

But today leading scientists say the new machines are just as ineffective. 

"There are many, many ways of defeating the system," said Dr. Tom Cochran of the Natural Resources Defense Council, "and they are ways that would be known to people who know how to manufacture an improvised explosive device."

In Los Angeles today, Secretary Chertoff acknowledged the need for more testing on this latest generation of equipment.

"As we're entering the field testing phase, we ought to kick the tires very hard," he said.

Scientists say about the only real proven improvement in the new machines is a lot fewer false alarms. The old ones would go off if they detected kitty litter or bananas.

That no longer happens, but they still can't detect well-shielded nuclear bomb material.   

Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?

To Blotter Homepage

July 20, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (13)

User Comments

What is it exactly that the Conservative’s want to conserve?

Posted by: just sayin | Jul 20, 2007 8:17:40 PM

Your article is very weak and rather naive. Do you really expect politicians or bureaucrats to be able to effectively test these systems or even understand them?
Do some research and thinking on your own man. The talking head from the Natural Resources Defense Council brilliantly displays his ignorance on the subject when he compares it to manufacturing an IED. Good grief man, if this is the best you can do get a different job!

Posted by: Rob | Jul 20, 2007 10:47:26 PM

I believe that there are many concerns with this systems. Unfortunately the inspection is slow and therefore impractical for the task at hand. Who conducts the test really is not an issue, the issue is measured performance and reliability. A $2 billion investment should definitely yield a good measure of both. Next, there is more concern that an attack will occur via small boat(s) like the Destroyer Cole. We need to seal our off-shore borders, and that is going to take partipation of the American Citizen as 'observers.' There is just too much shoreline and too many opportunities for attack - crowded beaches, on-water entertainment, shore side office buildings and condos. 102 people made it on shore in a boat without detecton - could have been a flock of suicide bombers. Think about it.

Posted by: Dave | Jul 21, 2007 8:06:03 AM

The Dept of Homeland Security is just an expensive joke. Much of their time and effort are spent harassing air travelers in and out of the US while our Southern border with Mexico remains wide open. It is just another useless government dept now with a lobby to work for more of our tax revenue.

Yes, we have a real terrorist problem and we are at risk of a nuclear terror attack but Homeland Security is like trying to defend America with the Post Office, utterly incompetent.

Since the Feds have failed in this regard, maybe the states and major cities should take over this job with private agencies. Cities like New York, DC and others are at reak risk here.

Posted by: Ron Holland | Jul 21, 2007 9:00:09 AM

The only thing I can think of is for our Government to hire more inspecters to serch for nukes and open every container and barrel to check inside. There is no better way to do it than man himself. It would probably cost an arm and a leg to do it this way but think what it will cost us in life and property if even one nuke sliped though and those bad guys hit the trigger. If that happened I would suggest that our Government send 1 or 2 hundred nukes to the Arab states and blow them off the map! Can you think of a better way to handle this? If so, let's hear it. Al

Posted by: Al Reiller | Jul 21, 2007 11:14:15 AM

Dear Ross and Team: This story to detect nuclear products...is this going to help us in the long duration of war..I know we have to take steps but what about our men over there...Most people are not seeing the longterm, the stance to protect our infrastructure with personne who can stand and be very diligent to aid this nation...How are Americans and others trying to come to the table of every community...tell us more of what each state is doing to hire and bring forth people for employment for federal jobs...we need people for this proetection...Apachecheynne

Posted by: Apachecheynne@Yahoo.com | Jul 21, 2007 1:42:17 PM

Brian Ross, I haven't seen an idiot like you. You call yourself as "Investigative Journalist", don't you? Instead of reporting loopholes in US's security, for a change why don't you report, for once where Bin Laden and Jawahiri is? From where they are releasing those video and audio messages to AQ's terrorists? Can you do that? Do you have that much guts, courage and intelligence to investigate that and report that? Reporting loopholes in US's security is not a big deal, any tom-dick-harry who claim to be an "Investigative Journalist" can do that. Try reporting about AQ's terrorists and Hesbollah terrorists, then you will understand what "Investigative Journalism" is. Do you have what it takes to go into the remote regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan and "investigate" how these AQ terroirts operate there? How the local tribes are helping them and more importantly how, Pakistani army and Pakistan's Intelligence Service ISI is helping them? Do you have what it takes to find out how ISI is protecting senior AQ and Talibaan leaders? Try doing that for a change and then you can claim that you are an "Investigative Journalist". Can you do that?

Posted by: Tom Weisman | Jul 22, 2007 10:22:19 PM

They (the $tatus quo) has been telling us for decades that nuclear technology is clean and safe. Therefore... we have nothing to worry about if al Qaeda gets their hands on some nukes. Right?

Posted by: GUY FOX | Jul 23, 2007 5:12:06 AM

Guy Fox, that post is just incredibly silly, man....

Posted by: Jazz | Jul 23, 2007 10:57:25 AM

Nukes do not have to be smuggled INTO the country. Detonation in s small plane,cargo container,or on ship off shore near a port, or city would be simple, secure and highly effective. With all our heigthened security tons of drugs still get in. and then there are the nukes the USSR claims to have planted in the US during the "Cold" war...Sorry stil not ready to give up freedom for security. Not Scared Yet.

Posted by: Col Ed | Jul 24, 2007 1:04:18 AM

I am not surprised by the waste of money, politicians don't think the money they are putting in their pockets is wasted. Like republicans, they consider the trickle down effect, they steal it, spend it and the economy thrives. What really gets me is their total lack of concern of the citizens of this country. We as a nation need to put our petty differences aside and let the politicians who run this country find out who really runs this country, the people!

Posted by: william fearn | Jul 24, 2007 1:54:25 PM

I thought the people spoke in 2006...

Posted by: Jazz | Jul 26, 2007 10:22:27 AM

"Do you really expect politicians or bureaucrats to be able to effectively test these systems or even understand them?"

Do you know what the GAO is?

Posted by: Justin | Jul 26, 2007 6:05:24 PM

Post a comment