BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
20 Heavily Trafficked Bridges in Urgent Need of Repair: Is Yours on the List?
August 02, 2007 8:17 PM
Twenty heavily trafficked bridges "may need to be replaced" because they are structurally deficient, according to national bridge inspection data. These bridges scored a lower structural integrity rating than the I-35W bridge in Minnesota before its collapse.
According to the 2006 National Bridge Inventory, the Minnesota bridge received a "50% sufficiency" rating. The Federal Highway Administration says any bridge with a rating of 50 percent or lower is considered "structurally deficient" and "may need to be replaced."
The Minnesota bridge carried an average of 180,000 commuters per day. An ABC News analysis of the National Bridge Inventory data reveal that at least 20 other bridges carrying more than 190,000 daily commuters are in even worse structural shape.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Half of the 20 bridges are located in New Jersey and California, including the famous San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (pictured above).
The New Jersey Route-21 Bridge over the I-80 corridor is the busiest, with more than 518,000 daily commuters and a 49 percent sufficiency rating. The lowest rated bridge is the Raritan River Smith Street Bridge in New Jersey which 208,000 commuters drive across daily. It earned a rating of only 20 percent.
The Federal Highway Administration's sufficiency rating serves only as a guideline and does not mean that a bridge is necessarily unsafe.
20 Most Deficient, Heavily-Trafficked Bridges (Source: 2006 National Bridge Inventory, Federal Highway Administration):
20.2%. New Jersey: Raritan River Smith St. Bridge over the Garden State Parkway. Daily commuter load of 208,000.
23.6%. New Jersey: Elizabeth River Bridge over the Garden State Parkway. Daily commuter load of 198,200.
27.2%. New Jersey: Port Reading Bridge over Grove Avenue. Daily commuter load of 191,530.
32%. New York: Lee Avenue Bridge (Section A) over Route I-278. Daily commuter load of 202,650.
32.1%. California: San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (Ala-Oak) over I-80. Daily commuter load of 277,700.
32.1%. Hawaii: Kapalama Canal over Halona Street. Daily commuter load of 211,528.
34%. New York: Joralemon Street Bridge over Route I-278. Daily commuter load of 202,650.
35%. Illinois: Stewart Avenue Bridge over I-90. Daily commuter load of 238,500.
36%. Colorado: South Platte River Bridge over I-25ML. Daily commuter load of 208,353.
42.5%. Virginia: Boundary Channel Bridge over Shirley Memorial Highway. Daily commuter load of 210,993.
46.3%. Georgia: Banberry Road Bridge over I-75. Daily commuter load of 266,060.
NOTE: The sufficiency rating of this bridge was raised to 73.9 percent after a Georgia Department of Transportation inspection on March 28, 2007.
46.3%. California: San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SF section) over I-80. Daily commuter load of 204,900.
46.3%. New Jersey: Elizabeth River Bridge over Garden State Parkway. Daily commuter load of 198,200.
47%. California: 5th Avenue Bridge over I-880. Daily commuter load of 240,000.
48%. California: Noakes Street Bridge over I-710. Daily commuter load of 240,000.
49%.New Jersey: Route-21 Bridge over I-280. Daily commuter load of 518,100.
49%. California: Bayshore Viaduct over Rte 101. Daily commuter load of 256,700.
49%. New York: Lee Avenue Bridge (Section C) over I-278. Daily commuter load of 202,650.
49%. Massachusetts: Cape Cod Canal over Route 28. Daily commuter load of 195,000.
50%. California: Metrolink over I-710. Daily commuter load of 235,440.
Some bridges are listed twice with different sufficiency ratings because civil engineers divide these bridges into separate sections.
This post has been updated.
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
August 2, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (101)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a professional engineer working in a state DOT position. I can say that typically nearly all bridges are safe. The problem is funding. What I feel our ecomony needs is the $500 billion spent in Iraq. A typical 900' steel beam high level bridge with design and construction will run about $20 million. That equates to 25,000 new interstate bridges across the country. An econimic engine would start and run this country for sometime if only that money were invested on our OWN soil.
Posted by: Matt Schulz | Aug 3, 2007 7:50:03 AM
With the concern of bridge safety I wanted to let you know of another bridge that puts "scary thoughts" each time it is crossed. It's known as the Madison-Milton bridge that links Madison, IN to Milton, KY. Madison lies on the Ohio River between Cincinnati, OH and Louisville, KY. Madison is about fifty miles east of Louisville and no bridges exist between the two cities. Cincinnati is upstream about 60 miles and there is a bridge about 20 miles from Madison toward Cincinnati. The Madison-Milton bridge (US 421) was built in 1921 which is two-lane and narrow. It had a new roadbed installed about ten years ago at a cost of $10 million dollars. There have been talks of replacing the bridge for many years and it appears that will be a potential consideration in another 5-10 years. The amount of traffic is obviously significant but with the number of semi-trucks that travel across the bridge each day is alarming. When the bridge was bult in 1921 this kind of traffic flow wasn't even conceived of. Every time I cross the bridge the thought enters my mind "is this the moment we'll go down".
The event in Minneapolis sure puts these thoughts into reality.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment.
Vernon
Posted by: Vernon Pyles | Aug 3, 2007 8:05:25 AM
now listen youse guys israel needs weapons a lot worst than we need bridges.rember(they are the chosen ones) we have to spend all of our money on dubya revenge war.doh-doh.
Posted by: farrakahn | Aug 3, 2007 8:13:57 AM
Some idiot spokesman on the news stated that over 80,000 bridges in this country have been declared sructually deficient but that does not mean they need to be torn down. No it doesnt but if it doesn't pertain to something that demands immediate attention then the words stuctually deficient are even more deficient then the bridges. Lets face it all of the infastrucure money has been wasted on the stupid war or by our elected officials.
Posted by: Bob Young | Aug 3, 2007 8:20:19 AM
We just have to be patient but keep on fixing our infrastructure. True it cost a lot of money to fix them but we need it. If we just use all those money that is spent on Iraq, we'll have more than enough to do the job.
Posted by: marc | Aug 3, 2007 8:53:19 AM
Wow, I need to get out of New Jersey now!
Posted by: Sam | Aug 3, 2007 9:02:13 AM
Its a shame how much integrity the USA has lost. Not just within, but all over the world. Most of the 'administrations' have grosely neglected this country and its people, and now we're paying the price for it. Not only in this country, but paying the price for other countries as well. Have we, lost our minds? Wait till you see whats coming.
Posted by: Wait till you see whats coming | Aug 3, 2007 9:11:48 AM
Looks like th folks in Jersey have been "on the cheap" with their bridges. Those folks have a big price to pay now. Get to work, Jersey!
Posted by: phildziki | Aug 3, 2007 9:29:49 AM
Sounds like we should send more troops to the Middle East
Posted by: Tim | Aug 3, 2007 9:31:11 AM
everyone is so upset about the bridge and the war in iraq but what everyone is forgetting is the bush did not start this war terrist did when the killed all those people in the 911 bombing what kind of a president do you all want one that will fight to protect this country or one that will hide behide the white house doors and say "i don't want to go out there this world is full of bullies." the bridge collape is the worst i have seen in my life but it didn't happen because of the war in iraq i watch the news everyday and i see how much money comes in to our states for this funding and that funding and frankly i blame the state it self for not putting all this money into the right place. the bridge between arkansas and greenville ms. is old and shakes like crazy and is a danger to lives everyday but arkansas and ms. are contrusting a new brige now that is safer all the states in the usa need to find the money they are spending on things that are not that important and use that money to fix the bridges in their states that are in need of repair or replacement and the usa would be safe and leave bush only because he is trying to protect the usa from terrist
Posted by: chris | Aug 3, 2007 9:37:55 AM
Not to make light of this subject, but we will probably import the re-placement bridge from China. It is a shame what has happened to this country. We have gone from the world's producer of goods and services to one that is bent on consumption while not taking care of our internal needs.
Posted by: Sean Northrop | Aug 3, 2007 9:44:24 AM
Wow, I live in NJ. The worst state in the union!!!!!! We have crazy blood sucking politicians and we are on the list several times...great job NJ!!!
Posted by: Terri B | Aug 3, 2007 10:09:04 AM
Yep! "Chris", "Terrists" started the whole thing! We never did anything wrong (or anything you could understand as wrong). And it's not Mr. Bush's fault. His faults are other, too few to mention, and yes, obviously have little to do with bridge collapses.
Chris: International bridges have collapsed also! (Those are bridges over in the "Terrist" countries) and yes,
"Terrist" are to blame for that too.
Specially Iraki "Terrist" which attacked us with WMD's, lucky for us we had president Bush, Cheney & Rummy prepared, and they destroyed Irak first!
You are another perfect citizen molded in the image of your flawless leader.
Posted by: Ray | Aug 3, 2007 10:28:11 AM
If one wants to look at crumbling infrastructure one only has to visit the Army Corp of Engineers dams built by the WPA in the early 1930's. These dams have had no appreciable work done on them since around 1968 and many are about ready to collapse. I live near 11 of them and each one leaks during normal rains.
Posted by: Digger | Aug 3, 2007 10:32:31 AM
Our whole system of infrastructure design and repair is based on the "how many people died" equation. To get a stop sign, to get a traffic light, to get a highway or to get a bridge. Forward thinking is todays environment only gets claims of "Boondoggle", "Pork", or "Overengineering." In the USA in today's political environment be it Republican, Democrat or any other, there is NO INCENTIVE to do the right thing before something blows up in our faces. Unfortunate, but true.
Posted by: Rooscow | Aug 3, 2007 11:05:14 AM
Does anyone else find it strange that traffic camera video of the bridge collapse was made available within hours, yet the traffic cam videos of the plane striking or flying toward the Pentagon have not been made available for six years?
Posted by: Willie | Aug 3, 2007 11:10:03 AM
"Tha fact that any have collapsed, is too many! There is no reason for these to have happened"
So the arguement is, if we throw enough money at a problem, then accidents will never happen? The point that was lost to many is that because of the good work that is done by both state and federal agencies, your chance of being killed in a structural failure of a bridge is around 1 in a TRILLION! And to suggest that I somehow lack empathy with those who lost their lives or their families is a cheap arguement, used by those with cheap points to make that can't hold water on their own. And for those who talk of the deficit, the projection is that the Federal Deficit will be 0 by next year, due to large increases in tax revenue gained during the strong economy.
Posted by: Retired_subsailor | Aug 3, 2007 11:18:52 AM
A bridge collapse near election time? It makes me wonder if it was staged to mask some other evil doing by the government. Or maybe it's staged to make Mr. U.S.A. look like a hero for his help with the rebuilding. Some of the comments above are completely understand. This country is so corrupt, they love to scare(government via media). The nursery rhyme "London Bridge is Falling Down" signifies the fall of their queen. Oh how I wish this bridge collapse signified the falling (not by death) of our head of state.
Posted by: L. Foster | Aug 3, 2007 11:23:48 AM
Katrina, Minnesota.
Your tax cuts at work.
Posted by: Janel | Aug 3, 2007 11:32:05 AM
Here comes the media blamers and the Political Cronies. Everytime a tragedy occurs the Dems or Repubs come out to blame each other and push their own agendas. That includes the political controlled media. Lets concentrate on ignoring these fools and just address the problems in our own states. No normal human beings want to deliberatly harm each other. Let the political crap that breeds on these posts go.
Posted by: Ted Dobson | Aug 3, 2007 11:35:05 AM
Post a comment
