BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Al Qaeda Videos May Be Doctored
August 13, 2007 10:59 AM
Media and terrorism experts alike have remarked on the increasing sophistication of al Qaeda propaganda videos that continue to be released by the group's media wing, as Sahab.
One computer expert, however, has conducted extensive image analysis on many of the videos and concluded that in many cases the tapes were likely doctored to give a false impression of the speaker's location.
Neal Krawetz, founder of Hacker Factor, a computer security and consulting firm, created a computer program which he uses to analyze screen frames from various al Qaeda videos, including those of al Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al Zawahri and American al Qaeda commander Adam Gadahn. His software suggests that in many cases the sophisticated backgrounds were likely added after the video of the speaker was recorded.
Photos: See What's Behind al Qaeda's Propaganda Tapes
By looking at the error levels of the different elements in the still frames, or JPEGs, he can tell which elements are older and which are newer. In other words, he can tell which areas of the video were modified more recently.
For example, in one video of Zawahri released in July of last year, he appears to be seated in a news studio complete with a backdrop of images of the World Trade Center attacks and hijacker Mohammed Atta.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
News commentators at the time remarked on how Zawahri, who many assumed to be hiding in a cave, was able to record a video message from a high-tech newsroom.
Krawetz, however, says that background was very likely added after Zawahri filmed his message.
"That's the fakest one so far," said Krawetz.
Krawetz found six different layers on one JPEG from that video, implying the various background components were very likely added after Zawahri recorded his message.
Krawetz says an even more visible clue occurs as the video itself plays, when there is a subtle shifting of the camera. The image of Zawahri appears to move side-to-side as if the camera is shaking while the background remains still.
In another video of Zawahri released in August 2005, the same summer as the bombing attacks on the London subway system, Zawahri appears outside of a tent with his trusted Kalashnikov behind him. At the time, some in the media remarked at the brazen message delivered in broad daylight just a few weeks after the London attacks.
Krawetz, however, notes that while the sunlight moves against the backdrop, the light levels on Zawahri's face never change. Once again, this implies the background could have been added after the video monologue was recorded. While it may appear he is staring into the sun because of the reflection in his eyeglasses, Krawetz speculates he was actually seated in front of a spotlight.
On the eve of the 9/11 anniversary last year, Zawahri and American al Qaeda leader Adam Gadahn released a video in which Gadahn praised the hijackers and their mission. On the tape, Gadahn is seen seated in a white room with a computer and books behind him.
After analyzing the image, Krawetz determined the books were at different error levels and a different color spectrum than the rest of the room, implying they were added when the subtitles and as Sahab logo were added to the video. Whether this was an attempt to send a message to followers, an attempt to hide something else in the background or served any purpose at all remains unclear.
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
August 13, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (47)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Absolutely, the BEST fake video to check out is the "Osama Confession Video."
...
The problem with the video is that the speaker doesn't look like Osama, doesn't have a voice that SOUNDS like Osama, doesn't compose his thoughts like Osama and doesn't actually confess to ANYTHING. According to experts in Arabic, the U.S. government took improper liberties in translating the comments the ACTOR ! made on tghe tape.
Posted by: Wild Bill | Aug 15, 2007 12:39:55 AM
You people are not making the connections. If the video is doctored then it is obvious that we are allowing that to happen. For example, if a student faked a term paper and the professor knowingly allowed that... Well, it is not just the student who is guilty. The mere fact that pentagon affiliations have allowed this crap get absorbed into the media is evidece, alone, that it is done on purpose. You are being lied to by your own government who feeds you this spewage. Think for yourself. Don't let these disinformation fenatics sway your own opinion.
Posted by: edward | Aug 15, 2007 1:32:36 AM
This story WAS ORIGINALLY about how the company who brings these videos to the Pentagon and the American people...was adding the As-Sahab logo at the same time as their own logo on these videos...which is curious in and of itself. I wonder why ABC chose to leave that part out of the story? No wait...I forgot. Mainstream media. My bad. ;)
Posted by: Jeremias X | Aug 15, 2007 3:30:19 AM
Great Comments everybody I am surprised some of them have not disappeared down the 'rabbit hole' by now.
We should be on guard as the next 'un-constitutional UN/illegal war' is foisted upon us.
Check it for yourself -
The United States has decided to designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, the country's 125,000-strong elite military branch, as a "specially designated global terrorist. - The Revolutionary Guard would be the first national military branch included on the list, U.S. officials said -- a highly unusual move because it is part of a government, rather than a typical non-state terrorist organization.
WP. - Robin Wright
Posted by: Thulsadoom | Aug 15, 2007 5:26:20 AM
9/11 was an inside job, al-qaeda is nothing but a scare tactic to frighten the sheeple, simple.
But ok, if there are terrorists running around everywhere, and all the terrorists are muslim, as some seem to think (forgetting that the worst terrorists are in the white house) why haven't the attack on two muslim countries provoked any terrorism in the USA, from the millions of muslims living there??? Your security is better now you say?? Don't think so, cause recently some crazy kid shot and killed over 30 people over a 2 hour time period, so that can't be it.
You have been fooled, wake up.
Posted by: seraph | Aug 15, 2007 6:53:49 AM
I'm simply amazed at how these cave dwellers and evil ones produce these high quality videos from the caves of Afghanistan. You would think our the Airforce would bomb the power lines going to these caves.
Nevermind, they are actors on a stage whose strings are being pulled by western intel agencies to further the Hegelian Dialect to further the control of Western Asian resources.
9/11-inside job?
Posted by: SwingDangler | Aug 15, 2007 10:04:51 AM
HA! What a joke! It's been known for a long time that many of the videos released by the 'terrorists' are nothing more than re-edited, re-hashed, re-released versions of the same footage. Not to mention the outright fake Bin Laden tapes released. This piece is nothing more than a weak attempt to put people off the trail of the real culprits behind all of these perfectly timed propaganda pieces. Do a google search on fake Bin Laden or fake Al Quaeda videos and you'll see exactly why this piece is running here and now.
Posted by: John | Aug 15, 2007 10:26:26 AM
Ahhh!
It's so refreshing to see more and more Americans waking up to the "Big Lie". It's about time!
Thanks ABC for helping the less informed finally begin to connect the dots. Are some Disney execs finally starting to get fed up with the fraudulent WOT too?
Posted by: George F | Aug 15, 2007 10:34:06 AM
if you dig deeper and read other articles instead of relying on idiot tv to spoon feed you. the other logo was a third party CIA affiliate,but your to busy smartin' off, trying to look cool on the internet. you'll be the one ready to commit suicide when the market crashes and the dollar collapses, oh but that doesn't exist either. neither does the foreign troops when they come knockin' on your door.
Posted by: getaclue | Aug 15, 2007 11:27:40 AM
this isn't about photography but image compression algorithms.
the software developed can tell what applications were used to doctor the pictures.
interestingly, it was found that the official logo of a private US intelligence firm was doctored into the videos with the same software as other portions of the video were doctored.
Posted by: Bard | Aug 15, 2007 11:28:21 AM
This article should be posted only if it confirmed that the videos are genuine.
I think, by default, terrorist will doctor their videos to hide their recording location.
Posted by: Pamela Anderson | Aug 15, 2007 12:49:20 PM
Al-CIA-Duh strikes again. The last Bin Laden video was five year old footage that anyone who is not a government teat sucking slave moron can go back and find on their own. In fact not only are almost all of the Bin Laden vids re-edited footage from OLD Bin-Laden Videos, but Military Intelligence and the CIA have supposedly killed several of the so called Al-Quaeda leaders five or six times without the media asking a single question about how one man can be repeately killed. New-Speak to be sure, but you morons will ask no questions and bow to our Lords and Saviours Bush and Hillary like slave Dogs. 1984 indeed.
Posted by: freeordie | Aug 15, 2007 1:22:05 PM
IT'S LIKE PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING, FOLKS!
Some believe it's real, others realize it's all show - like sports entertainment.
Posted by: Brent Mack | Aug 15, 2007 2:17:47 PM
Wow, abcnews.com really scooped this one!! Terrorist's doctoring photo's for their own purposes, and the news media eating them up without checking, details at 11!! These people are sad!! This was old news months ago for anyone who gets out of the ABC/NBC/CBS cradle!!
Posted by: Retired_subsailor | Aug 15, 2007 7:50:02 PM
The US is the real terrorist. Allah Akbar.
Posted by: N2 | Aug 16, 2007 2:19:53 AM
N2, yea yeah, God is great...we know...but the people of the ME have to start thinking about developing peace among themselves. Who is killing Iraqi's? The answer: Iraqi's. What happened this week in northern Iraq? Iraqi's slaughtering hundreds of Iraqi's...
In Gaza, Hamas' policies leave their own citizens starving (while the US offers aid to the Palistinian people).
And what about Darfur...who's doing the terrorizing there? Who's kidnapping and killing Philipino's on Mindanao (answer: not the US)
If you are referring to the American people as being terrorists, then you are way off, my friend (to a comical extent).
N2, I think you want to do right for the people of the world, but I think that you are just another suburban American teenager without much knowledge of the world or it's condition...when you are old enough to get a passport and venture out on your own, join an NGO and travel the world, providing tangible help to the human race...
Posted by: Jazz | Aug 16, 2007 9:51:48 AM
When are these "9/11 conspiracy theorists" going to give up? For one thing, eyewitnesses saw the planes crash into the towers! For another, the collapse of the freeway ramp caused by the crash of a propane truck in Oakland a few months ago proves that an intense fire can heat steel to the point of softening and losing structural integrity, and that a petroleum fueled fire can be that intense. I could go on, but what's the point? They're going to believe what they want to believe no matter how many facts stand in their way. All they are proving is, to paraphrase an old cliche, "You can lead a fool to knowledge, but you can't make him THINK"!
Posted by: rickhavoc1 | Aug 28, 2007 1:11:18 PM
Because a burning propane truck under a bridge could cause steel to weaken doesn't mean kerosene burning in a skyscraper designed to withstand several jet crashes at once will cause structural failure. Eyewitnesses saw the planes crash into the towers, but that proves nothing about who was piloting the planes and why they were crashed into the WTC, or why there are so many other glaring inconsistencies between the official story and the observed facts. But feel free to go on about it.
Posted by: NoOneYouKnow | Aug 30, 2007 1:08:39 PM
In the words of a famous prognosticator, I say "Wolf, Wolf!"
Posted by: bob | Sep 1, 2007 7:40:06 AM
"an intense fire can heat steel to the point of softening and losing structural integrity, and that a petroleum fueled fire can be that intense."
Actually, no, burning kerosene (jet fuel) comes no where near the melting temperature of structural steel. C4 plastic explosive...different story.
Posted by: bob | Sep 1, 2007 7:44:07 AM
Post a comment
