BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Book: Wanted Criminal Flew U.S. Supply Missions in Iraq
August 21, 2007 12:53 PM
The U.S. government paid a wanted international criminal roughly $60 million to fly supplies into Iraq in support of the war effort, a new book alleges.
Intelligence officials have considered arms merchant and international trafficker Viktor Bout one of the greatest threats to U.S. interests, in the same league as al Qaeda kingpin Osama bin Laden. Interpol has issued a warrant for his arrest; the United Nations Security Council has restricted his travel.
Yet from 2003 through at least 2005, Pentagon contractors used air cargo companies known to be connected to Bout to fly an estimated 1,000 supply trips into and out of Iraq, according to "Merchant of Death: Money, Guns, Planes, and the Man Who Makes War Possible."
It could have been worse, the authors report. Shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, Bout -- whose arms shipments to the Taliban regime in Afghanistan were believed to have aided al Qaeda -- pitched the CIA a multi-million dollar proposal to help rout the Taliban from the country and capture Osama bin Laden, according to Douglas Farah and Stephen Braun.
Farah is a former reporter for the Washington Post; Braun is a national correspondent for the Los Angeles Times.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
The deal never came together. But Bout found business with the United States in 2003, flying supplies into newly-invaded Iraq as a subcontractor to U.S. military contractors, including Fluor and Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR), the authors say, citing military flight records as evidence. The flights continued even after President Bush signed an order banning Americans from doing business with Bout or his associates, the authors report.
A spokeswoman for KBR acknowledged to the authors the company had hired a Bout-connected cargo firm through an intermediary, but that it had no knowledge of the ties at the time. A request for comment to the Fluor Corporation from ABC News was not immediately answered.
In a January 2005 letter to Congress, then-Assistant Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz admitted the Defense Department "did conduct business with companies that, in turn, subcontracted work to second-tier providers who leased aircraft owned by companies associated with Mr. Bout."
Defense officials were busy making sure Bout's planes no longer flew for the United States, he wrote. Nine days after Wolfowitz's letter, a Bout-controlled plane touched down in Mosul, Iraq, according to the book's authors.
Bout's work in Iraq first became public in a May 2004 article in the Financial Times newspaper. CIA officials in Washington secretly warned colleagues in Baghdad of the ties in fall 2003, the authors report. "It would appear...that it did not make its way to the correct folks," the two quote an unnamed CIA official as saying.
In an interview with the Blotter on ABCNews.com, Farah said he and Braun calculated the number of flights by Bout-owned planes by reviewing U.S. Air Force fueling logs, military flight records and interviewing U.S. military officials and private air cargo contractors.
Bout didn't just walk away with millions of taxpayer dollars, the authors found. The military issued Bout's pilots supply cards allowing them to gas up their planes for free when landing in Iraq. A Defense Department spokesman confirmed to the authors that Bout's fleet made off with nearly 500,000 gallons of fuel from the Baghdad airport courtesy of the U.S. Air Force.
Bout made his fortune in the 1990s selling Soviet-era weaponry to Third World despots and insurgent groups. Using a "veiled, complex corporate structure," Bout dispatched fleets of Cold War-era Soviet cargo planes to some of the most inhospitable corners of the earth, running guns for dictators, including Liberia's Charles Taylor and Zaire's Mubuto Sese Seko, as well as rebel leaders in Angola, Sierra Leone and beyond. By 2000, U.S. government officials considered him one of the leading threats to the United States, on par with Osama bin Laden and global warming.
Bout was the inspiration for the 2005 film, "Lord of War," starring Nicolas Cage as an international arms dealer who will sell to all sides of any conflict. Bout reportedly rented his planes to the movie's producers for use in the film.
Bout's net worth is not known, Farah told ABCNews.com, but a conservative estimate is "in the tens of millions of dollars." Bout now lives in Moscow, Russia, he said, and travels on false passports because of an international travel ban. An e-mail to Bout's lawyer for comment was not returned.
"Bout pulled off the ultimate metamorphosis," the authors write, "from hunted international criminal to the U.S. military's secret deliveryman."
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
This post has been revised.
August 21, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (32)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Oh good. We are paying them over there so we don't have to pay them over here.
Does anyone else think that the current Republican regime isn't quite up to the task of protecting America? At this point, I wouldn't trust a Republican to walk my dog.
Posted by: bobby stickers | Aug 21, 2007 1:14:53 PM
interesting
Posted by: disabledvet46 | Aug 21, 2007 1:32:28 PM
I am not surprised by this. Our government has a history of supporting dictators and murderers when it is in our interest to do so. Doesn’t anyone remember that at one time we were supportive of Saddam Hussein when it was in our interest to do so? Doesn't anyone remember when we supported Manuel Noriega when it was in our interest to do so? Some more integrity would be nice, but it all appears to depend on whether or not the bottom line is profitable for us and expediency.
Posted by: Brian, Decatur, GA | Aug 21, 2007 2:00:12 PM
Wow, makes me feel real good, knowing our country wants to protect us this much!
Posted by: Michelle | Aug 21, 2007 2:29:06 PM
What's the big deal!!! We got a VP who when he was CEO for Haliburton had a subsidiary open an office in the British Cayman Islands to circumvent the US embargo against Saddam. If we can have a VP do that, what the big deal about this guy.
And let's look at the Carlyle Group. They sell to both sides and have investors all over the world. And GW on the board. Bush Sr was a paid consultant. This is how the Bin Ladens and the Bush family became friends.
Posted by: Roy | Aug 21, 2007 2:38:22 PM
Have we had any planes flying in to US airspace illegally with arab kamikaze pilots killing mass numbers of American citizens here recently? Nope, have not had any dirty bombs exploding in LAX, MIA or LAX.....no bilogical terror happened since 9-11. Still sleeping in my bed safely at night knowing in my heart that obviously someone is doing their job right! This is just another liberal media gimmick to get liberal democratic voters feathers ruffled and to start spouting off obscenity's at the Bush Administration and conservative Republicans as a whole. Thank you ABC,CNN and CNBC for yet another biased one-sided article. I only take what you all write with a grain of salt. Now to go back to Fox News....i can only take so much of you all.
Posted by: becca | Aug 21, 2007 2:53:41 PM
So what? In war you sometimes have very strange bedfellows. Who do you want to get the arms in, FedEx? This is a guy that has experiance doing what he does and he does it very well.
Posted by: Jeff | Aug 21, 2007 2:54:40 PM
If he doesn't do it, someone else will. It's a revolving door.
Posted by: MediaLady | Aug 21, 2007 3:19:00 PM
The republican party is corrupt to the very core. Specifically, this administration, to which they cling, is nothing short of the FIRST US coup d'état since we stole this place from the natives.
Posted by: George Kause | Aug 21, 2007 3:24:15 PM
I wouldn't trust any politician to clean my toilet.
Posted by: Patriot 2007 | Aug 21, 2007 3:26:54 PM
bobby stickers-I agree about the Republicans but unfortunately for the USA the Democrats are also incapable of it either. Neither party has anyone who can be called a leader. They are all just politicians.
Posted by: Txguy | Aug 21, 2007 3:27:21 PM
This Republican administration knows exactly what its doing, (from Rumsfield to Cheney to Bush to Rove). The insiders are making millions for themselves and their families without a care to us 'less fortunate folks'. Unfortunately we can't depend on the Democrats to clean up the mess as I fear they almost as unethical and morally corrupt. Otherwise Polosi and others in leadership would be calling for impeachment NOW.
Posted by: ken | Aug 21, 2007 3:37:33 PM
and you would trust a liberal democrat, bobby stickers??
They won't even prosecute those in OUR country currently breaking the law (ILLEGAL immigrants)
I'm not saying the current situation in Iraq is ideal, but I doubt the dems could do any better.
Posted by: STEVE | Aug 21, 2007 3:50:51 PM
Bobby, If you would let any politican walk your dog you just don't think much of your dog.
Posted by: Johnny | Aug 21, 2007 4:05:13 PM
"I'm not saying the current situation in Iraq is ideal, but I doubt the dems could do any better."
I don't remember any Democrats manufactoring evidence to lie us into a war? Maybe you are right, an occupation of Iraq was bound to end in failure, but doesn't that just mean that a competent administration would have kept us out? After all, it is not as if they were any kind of a threat.
Posted by: bobby stickers | Aug 21, 2007 4:52:39 PM
"and you would trust a liberal democrat, bobby stickers??"
I tend to trust trustworthy people and not trust untrustworthy people, so I guess the answer is yes.
This kind of sums up the difference between Liberals and Conservatives. Liberals look at all the Republican politicians going to jail and being indicted and say "see the Republicans are corrupt". Conservatives look at all the Republican politicians going to jail and being indicted and say "see they are all corrupt". They then go on to complain about hispanics, mexicans, illegal immigrants, and one of the Clintons (depending upon who is in the news).
I say, let us go with the facts. Even one accepts the premise that the process of dedicating oneself to public service makes one corrupt, it is hard to argue with the facts that the amount of corruption among Democrats is a tiny, tiny, fraction of the corruption among Republicans. What is the current figure, about a hundred corrupt Republicans for each corrupt Democrat? That is not just a statistical anomoly.
Posted by: bobby stickers | Aug 21, 2007 5:20:59 PM
"I only take what you all write with a grain of salt. Now to go back to Fox News....i can only take so much of you all. Posted by: becca"
Yep, pretty addictive Kool-aid, huh, becca?
Posted by: elmerg | Aug 21, 2007 6:50:22 PM
I'm going to start watching Fox News as soon as Tony Snow, the master of tall tales, returns to the network. Fox has a way of portraying and spinning all the dirt uncovered in this Administration in a positive and optimistic light. Rather than criticize and hammer away at Mr. Bush at every opportunity, we should adopt the fairly tale illusionary world of Fox News and praise and worship the Commander in Chief.
Posted by: mongo100 | Aug 21, 2007 7:36:59 PM
Yes, we all know plenty about Victor Bout. It's one more reason why we have been shaking our heads in disgust for the past six years.
Why has RICO not been applied to the Bush Regime? Obviously because the entire US Government is corrupt and needs to be replaced.
But it stays in place because central bankster gangsters control all of the western political world through fiat myth-money.
Posted by: Tom Lowe | Aug 23, 2007 1:50:31 AM
Is the Osama BL the same guy who was reported dying in a Mid East hospital of kidney failure, by the cia, who then nipped over to a cave in Afghan and shut down the half trillion dollar US air defenses with his laptop, so his incompetents wouldnt NOT be intercepted. Anybody talking bout Osama BL today in th is context be a govt misinformer..
Posted by: ThomasT | Aug 23, 2007 10:08:35 AM
Post a comment
