« Previous | Main | Next »

CIA Report Blames Tenet for 9/ll Failure

August 21, 2007 2:22 PM

Ciareportblam_mn_2 Former CIA director George Tenet "bears ultimate responsibility" for failing to create a strategic plan to stop al Qaeda prior to 9/ll, according to a review by the CIA's inspector general that was made public today, more than two years after it was written.

The report says that while Tenet wrote he wanted "no resources or people spared" in going after al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, neither he, nor his deputy, "followed up these warnings and admonitions by creating a documented, comprehensive plan to guide the counterterrorism effort."

"I know now why Tenet worked so hard to kill this report," said former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke, now an ABC News consultant.

World News Video: CIA Failures Leading Up to 9/11 Exposed

In a written statement, Tenet, who received the Medal of Freedom from President Bush, said the report was "flat wrong." Tenet said the inspector general failed to interview him. "He fails to understand how intensely I pushed the counterterrorism issue," Tenet said.

The current CIA director, Gen. Mike Hayden, said the report was being made public "against his wishes" but as required by law. Hayden said he, like his predecessor Porter Goss, had no plans to punish CIA officials cited in the report.

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

In recounting intelligence failures prior to 9/ll, the inspector general said there was neither "a single point of failure nor a silver bullet" that would have enabled the CIA to predict or prevent the 9/ll attacks.

But the report concludes there were "failures to implement and manage important processes, to follow through with operations, and to properly share and analyze critical data."

The report says Tenet "did not use all his authorities in leading the IC's (intelligence community's) strategic effort" against bin Laden.

"That's not fair," said ABC News consultant Clarke. "Of course there was a strategic effort, and he did raise the issue at the highest levels of government."

Vote: Do you think Tenet is to blame for failing to stop al Qaeda before 9/11?

And the report provides new details of the CIA's failure to alert the FBI that two al Qaeda operatives, who would be among the 9/ll hijackers, had entered the United States.

According to the report, "some 50 to 60" inside the CIA read "one or more of six Agency cables" that reported the two men had flown through Bangkok to Los Angeles.

The cables "were read by overseas officers and Headquarters personnel, operations officers and analysts, managers and junior employees," the report says, but over the course of 18 months, no one from the CIA shared the information with the FBI or sought to put the names on the State Department's terror watch list.

"That so many individuals failed to act in this case reflects a systemic breakdown," the report concludes. "Basically, there was no coherent, functioning watch listing program," it says.

Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?

August 21, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (126)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why does this not suprise me? I'm sure it suprises some but watching this unfold for so many years, it doesn't suprise me one bit, being in government myself.

Posted by: J | Aug 21, 2007 4:03:34 PM

Too bad the FBI CIA did not share information. Hell even a FEMALE FBI agent had put it all together. The headstrong MALE leadership of the FBI just slushed it off as a female hunch.

Hmmm,... maybe there's something to this womans intuition, nope; she had all the names AND Facts

Posted by: Joe | Aug 21, 2007 4:10:14 PM

I just read through the left-wing chatter: Bush lied, good men died, blah, blah. If the libs were not so intent on blaming Bush, they may be able to realize that everyone, and I mean everyone believed the same intelligence data. Now the question is: who was responsible for collecting that data? Answer: George Tenet.

Posted by: Bob Corey | Aug 21, 2007 4:22:37 PM

maybe Bush can give Scooter Libby the medal of freedom too...can't wait until Jan 2009, don't let the door "slam-dunk" you when you leave the whitehouse, you lame duck...

Posted by: StaunchRepublican | Aug 21, 2007 4:23:02 PM

Well, it certainly clears Bush. Bush was in office only 7 months and the Al Quada were in place and fully trained before he even took office. Too bad Bush wanted to "change the tone" in Washington and kept Clinton's people in key positions when he should have striped all of Clintons failures out immediately. It is clear that Gorelick, Tenet, and Sandy Berger caused the problem. I still wonder what important documents Berger stole from the National Archives.

Posted by: Bill | Aug 21, 2007 4:23:56 PM

Who is to blame? How about the people that planned the 9/11 attacks, and those that implemented the plan.

I know it is tough for most whiners to do anything other than blame Bush for everything, but hey...most people are simple minded apes who can barely take care of themselves.

Posted by: Jack Mahogov | Aug 21, 2007 4:24:10 PM

I thought the terrorists were responsible for 9/11. Why doesn't someone write a report blaming them?

Posted by: Ralph | Aug 21, 2007 4:32:28 PM

Of course, in the world of look for another job if you don't tell Bush what he wants to hear, it is all Tenet's fault. I'm just surprised it has taken all this time for Bush to make the announcement. It won't be long now before my history books tell me that they did find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq right after we were greeted as liberators in a war in which

Posted by: Sara B. | Aug 21, 2007 4:38:06 PM

Wow, the idiot right are in full swing on this column! Blame Clinton, spare my country cowboy Preznit! Blame Clinton!

Freddie at 3:28:07 PM: "Qaeda didn't master mind that attack in the 7 month Bush was in office...Clinton was worthless, look at all the attacks on AMERICA starting with the World Trade center in 93... and they did nothing....." What "all the attacks" are you talking about?!?!?!

You idiot. Bush and his "gubnit" were asleep at the wheel their entire first year and 9/11 happened. Instead of blaming Bill Clinton, how about holding your savior's feet to the fire and be a little more skeptical rather than sheepish.

Posted by: KTM | Aug 21, 2007 4:38:45 PM

And, why? Why did the Iraq Study Group only look back ten years for motives or esprit de corps between Saddam and Anti-American radicals? Al Qaeda?

Still wonder how any Democrat or anyone can contribute or support Hillary's candidacy for the reason that she was the mother hen sitting on our homeland political nest when the nineteen moved-in, moved-on, set up home and careers all to seemingly receive the same "you can have your American Dream" blessing from Clintons? After Pearl Harbor those who were sitting in charge at times of planning were removed; isn't sitting in times of plan initiation and evolution of plan more faultful than just being new presider? I for one, especially in light of this story, cannot believe Hillary's word choices today.

Posted by: jphogan | Aug 21, 2007 4:42:25 PM

With any large organization, like the Bush Administration/ White House... what the Top dog or vice-dog want or express as a desire, trickles down. It is only obvious that Bush/ Chaney were caught flat footed on 911, not taking any information from the outgoing administration seriously until it was too late. They used the tragedy of 9-11(undoubtedly with Roves help) to their political advanage...then, grossly abusing the peoples patiotic outrage, going into Afghanistan as only a stepping stone to get Saddam Hussein.

Posted by: Ed Reynolds | Aug 21, 2007 4:43:36 PM

Another fall guy for the Bush administration?

I guess "just following orders" is not an acceptable defense.

Posted by: bobby stickers | Aug 21, 2007 4:48:59 PM

On Bush's watch, he ignored the daily briefing he received, didn't alert anyone and continued his vacation-as he has taken more than a YEAR off in the last six years, it seems there is NOTHING that will get this guy's attention-not KATRINA, not the WAR, not the ECONOMY-he's pretty blase' about most things-if Al Gore had been permitted to serve as he was elected to do, he would have been CRUCIFIED for such disregard of American security.

Posted by: jeanruss | Aug 21, 2007 4:50:05 PM

Hopefully we've learned from our failures, but it's ignorant to say it was one person's fault or to believe we are not at risk from another strike.

Al Qaeda is to blame for this attack, just as Japan was to blame for Pearl Harbor.

Sometime in the future Americans will be harmed again, whether in the US's borders or outside it. We should be thankful for our liberties, our way of life, and our prosperity. Of course we should try to prevent this kind of attack whenever we can, and learn from any mistakes we make, but we should avoid the politics of fear and revenge from destroying the ideals that made America the great nation it is.

Posted by: seth | Aug 21, 2007 4:51:07 PM

Yeah? They were caught flat footed on 9/11, they were caught flat footed when Katrina hit, they were caught flat footed on Iraq... where does it end with this administration? The sixteen months can't go by soon enough for me.

Posted by: Looken | Aug 21, 2007 4:54:43 PM

So did Bush award Tenet for allowing 9/11 to happen or to keep him quiet?

Posted by: bobby stickers | Aug 21, 2007 4:56:28 PM

inside job!
inside job!
inside job!
When will people OPEN their EYES!
The best place to hid stuff is "In Plane Sight"
Arabs with box cutters are not at all responsible. The real terrorist is the shame of a president we have. 7..yes 7 of the so called terrorists are ALIVE! Pentagon was hit my a MISSLE not a plane...planes dont leave 16 foot holes.

Posted by: samantha | Aug 21, 2007 4:56:40 PM

This is a new low for the Bush administration.... or rather what's LEFT of the Bush administration. Anyone falling for this ought to be shot.

Posted by: Troy Street | Aug 21, 2007 4:58:35 PM

Clinton should have fired Tenet when he made no effort to kill Osama after Bill ordered him to. But why would Bush fire prosecutors he appointed yet keep a left over CIA director? It smells bad, like there's something we don't know...

Posted by: born_7-4 | Aug 21, 2007 4:59:12 PM

Yup..that darn Tennet. Remember when he canceled the weekly Terrorism meetings in the White House and assigned Terrorism to FEMA? It was just such actions that set up OBL. I remember when he howled "Wag the Dog when BC was chunking cruise missiles into Afghanistan in attempt to kill OBL. Remember his "phony issue" comment? Yup, it was all his fault and HINT HINT..Clinton appointed him.

Posted by: Richard | Aug 21, 2007 5:11:33 PM

Post a comment