« Previous | Main | Next »

Secret White House Manual: How to Stop Anti-Bush T-Shirts

August 17, 2007 12:16 PM

Apr_scotus_rank_070817_mn The Bush administration has agreed to pay $80,000 to a husband and wife who were ejected from a presidential rally because of their anti-Bush T-shirts.

The settlement ends a suit brought by a Texas couple and the American Civil Liberties Union, claiming the couple's First Amendment rights were violated when they were arrested and removed from a taxpayer-funded event featuring President Bush because their shirts read "Love America, Hate Bush" and "Regime Change Starts at Home."

Jeffery and Nicole Rank refused directions from event staff and law enforcement to cover up their shirts at a July 4, 2004, West Virginia rally featuring President Bush. The pair were arrested, detained and charged with trespassing. The charges were later dismissed.

Brian Ross Investigates: Campaign Rallies Against Wrong T-Shirts

The settlement, in which the government admitted no wrongdoing, came after the disclosure of an allegedly "sensitive" Presidential Advance Manual, which laid out the White House's meticulous efforts to protect the president and his public image from dissent.

"As a last resort, security should remove the demonstrators from the event," the manual instructs. The government turned over a heavily redacted version of the manual to the ACLU in the course of the lawsuit.

Pres_manual_070817_main The first step to keeping demonstrators out of events, the manual tells the president's event staff, is to encourage the Secret Service to "ask the local police department to designate a protest area...preferably not in view of the event site or the motorcade route."

Watch Brian Ross' '04 Investigation on "Good Morning America"

Inside the event space, the manual advises, White House advance personnel should preposition "rally squads" that can swarm any protesters at the event and "use their signs and banners as shields between the demonstrators and the main press platform."

The rally squads can be formed using "college/young republican organizations, local athletic teams, and fraternities/sororities," the manual notes.

The squads can "lead supportive chants to drown out the protesters (USA!, USA!, USA!)," it suggests.

In a 2004 investigation, ABC News found such tactics were apparently used by the Democratic Kerry presidential campaign as well. In that investigation, ABC News producers wore T-shirts featuring the opposing candidate to campaign-sponsored rallies. Bush aides instructed producers to leave the presidential re-election rally; at a Kerry rally, they were surrounded and followed by a team of dancing Democratic campaign workers with large signs.

The manual is stamped "SENSITIVE – DO NOT COPY." Its cover warns readers that "it is a violation of Federal law to duplicate or reproduce this manual without permission. It is not to be photocopied or released to anyone outside of the Executive Office of the President, White House Military Office or United States Secret Service."  It is currently posted on the ACLU's Web site, and available here.

Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?

August 17, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (71)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is not a partisan issue. When President Bill Clinton was at a public appearance in Chicago a husband and wife were arrested because they shouted "You suck" in his direction.

Posted by: jmurphy | Aug 17, 2007 10:49:47 PM

Hey if he wants to get rid of the shirts why don't he just quit and go back to Texas nobody will miss him .

Posted by: darkfall | Aug 17, 2007 10:54:17 PM

AS FOR THE T-SHIRT ISSUE THE SHOULD HAVE WORN ONE THAT SAID "I USED TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!" AS FOR THE TAXPAYER'S PAYING THE $80,000 WHO DO YOU THINK WILL FOOT THE BILL FOR THIER JENNA'S WEDDING AT THE WHITHOUSE IF THEY HAVE ONE THERE? HMMMMMMMMMMMM????

Posted by: brian | Aug 17, 2007 11:54:24 PM

I'M GONNA "IMPEACH" BUSH AND CHENEY SO FAST, IT'LL SOUND LIKE A ROCKET BREAKING THE SOUND BARRIER !!!!! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH FROM THESE 2 BIT IDIOTS WHO ARE NOTHING BUT LIARS AND CON ARTISTS !! WERE TIRED ALSO OF TONY SNOW, PULLING A SNOW JOB ON AMERICA,HOPE LIGHTINING STRIKES HIM !!!!

Posted by: JETRANGER | Aug 18, 2007 12:18:33 AM

"Hate Bush"?

Sounds like "hate speech" to me. Last time I heard, some moron decided that's not covered by the First Amendment.

Hmm.

Make up your minds.

Posted by: MZ | Aug 18, 2007 12:31:52 AM

The entire United States is a "free speech zone". Not some place well away from the sight of the Shrub. It is, as stated earlier, in the first amendment to the Constitution. It is wrong for either side to use that tactic. However, when it comes to dirty tricks, they became a new force with Tricky Dick and were improved upon by Karl Rove. They are wrong and should be a class A felony.

And, to JLS, I live in Florida, and, yes the election was stolen. People were not allowed to vote, just as in Ohio in 2004. Voter registration lists were scrubbed, removing thousands of voters who were legally allowed to vote. And even with that, when the voted were recounted, in most of the scenarios used in the recount, Gore won. I would like to suggest you turn off Rush (the drug addict) and watch something other than Faux News for a while.

Posted by: KSpurgeon | Aug 18, 2007 12:47:13 AM

The whole purpose of the filtering is to aid in protecting the president. It would be easier for some one seeking to kill the president to hide in a group of protesters since they are more apt to be disruptive.
The same thing was done when Clinton was president, and Bush 1 as well. I never got near any Reagan rallies, or Carter either.
Its easier to protect the president's life when you keep discenters back. Supporters aren't going to try to kill him, and neither are most protesters, but the odds of a protester reporting some one preping for an assination attempt are slim. In fact, I'd bet most of the posters here, and ALL of the folks at dailyKOS would not report or try to stop an assasination attempt on Bush. Even at the thought of Cheney in the oval office.

Posted by: Jerry | Aug 18, 2007 9:51:11 AM

"can i wear a shirt that says "I'm muslim"? or a shirt that that says "i'm a jew" at a presidential rally?"

as long as it says you support Bush you can.

after all the constitutions just a "goddamn piece of paper" thats a quote from King George.

Posted by: Tom | Aug 18, 2007 11:31:26 AM

"If you disagree with them then you are a racist, or a bigot, or a zionist pig, or warmonger. Before you criticize Bush, perhaps you should take a long look at the suppression of free speech that goes on at many left-wing events. All I hear in this blog are hypocrites."
Posted by: James

The right just hates it when they get called out on the errors of their ways, they automagically resort to playing the victim. Look James, the GOP had it made a few years ago, a massive majority, a compliant media, a diciplined message, etc. Now look at where you are. Playing the victim after screwing yourselves over, isn't going to win you compassion anymore. The republican party looks to be in its last throes these days with all their wailing.

Posted by: elfantasma_delosrepublicanos | Aug 18, 2007 12:34:54 PM

Bush has NEVER appeared in front of anything but carefully hand-picked crowds of supporters. The only place where he's ACTUALLY received without massive protests and cherry-picked crowds is Albania...one-twentieth the size of Texas.

Posted by: wilder5121 | Aug 18, 2007 1:38:07 PM

It never ever ever will cease to amaze me how ANYBODY ANYWHERE can still claim to believe that Bush being elected pResident and that Bush hasn't lied us into a miserable mess! Does anyone actually require more proof that the Republican Neocon Bush-backers only see what they weant to see and/or hear what they want to hear as opposed to what is real and true?!!!

Posted by: Darrie | Aug 18, 2007 3:06:08 PM

Bush's election to the Presidency WASN'T fraudulent and Bushco DIDN'T LIE us into an ugly illegal war?!!! LOL-I'm amazed that Bush-backer sheeple can still spout that drivel with a straight face! LOL---If it wasn't so repulsive that those STUPID people are still trying to be taking seriously, I'd laugh non-stop...but as it is, it's not really a laughing matter since we are stuck with the awful freedom crushing government Bush installed and the bloody, useless war he is killing our people and other nations people with. UGGGGH! How sickening!!

Posted by: Darrie | Aug 18, 2007 3:13:01 PM

The problem with all you REPUBlICANS is you think anyone who disagrees with you is anti american !!!!!

Posted by: Rick | Aug 18, 2007 5:22:57 PM

"All politicians are greasy, and this is a reflection thereof"

Once again, proof is uncovered relating to corruption or anti-American activities on the part of Republicans or the Bush regime, and as usual, someone out there says "see, everyone does it". I don't think that I need to point out is that only Republicans have been shown to arrest or persecute people for the "crime" of being Americans. Why don't we just go with the facts instead of letting personal prejudices and biases extrapulate crimes by Democrats and other politicians? Let us get rid of the ones we know are guilty before we start blaming ones that some wish were guilty.

Posted by: Tammy stickers | Aug 18, 2007 11:01:05 PM

Remember all the times that Bush told us that 'they' hated us for our freedoms? Seems they no longer have any reason to us...thanks Bush/Cheney, job well done!

Posted by: Shawn Fassett | Aug 19, 2007 12:16:58 AM

My Mom went to one of these rallies for Bill Clinton back in the 90's and the letter of invitation went so far as to tell people that anyone wearing anything
that could be considered incendiary would not be allowed in to the event.
Sadly, there is nothing new about our
elected leaders inability to deal with a
little public criticism.
People, we get what we pay for. So long as we continue to elect people based on how they make us feel, we will continue to elect people who make us feel embarrased.

Posted by: Patbgawne | Aug 19, 2007 1:24:05 AM

I like Bush and Channey they need to get rid of Lou Dobbs and Jack Cafferty on CNN for the being the bigwigs and anti-americans for hating on immigrants calling them all criminals so nonsence and misleading the public on the BUsh admin I'm sure Lou Dobbs is behind the T=shirt's sound like a Lou Dobbs thing.

Posted by: Gloria | Aug 19, 2007 4:57:41 AM

The horrendous thing about the decision behavior implicit in the instruction book is that is that the people implementing it -- under the diretion of the White House -- have set a horrible roll model for citizens of the united states and particularly kids in colleges, high schools and more. It sends a message that if someone has identified a problem that needs to be solved -- one can not go to the President of the University. I know this, because that is what the President of the University of Michigan has done to students here. Shame on you, for setting such a bad example. Is the model of democracy we wanted to set for the rest of the world? There is a time and place for everything But suppose these people had an urgent matter to be addressed. Trespassing? It doesn't matter who started it. 'At least Ronald Reagan's Press Secretary made it clear --- his publc appearances were photo oppportunities only.

Posted by: tecunalom | Aug 19, 2007 5:58:54 AM

Here's a radical idea on how to mitigate dissent, be honest with the American people and address our concerns. If our resources were used honestly after 9/11 to address the true terrorists there would be no need to manufacture support for Pres Bush. I'd be willing to bet if Americans thought we were truly dealing with real issues there would be no need for the Bush Admin to constantly explain the war. I think crowd control would be needed to contain the energy of support for our policies.

Posted by: pfrmny | Aug 19, 2007 11:56:16 AM

The question is moot that these people have NOT PROTECTED OR DEFENDED OUR CONSTITUTION.

Instead the question is this:

WHAT are the people going to do about it?

Posted by: Yellowbird | Aug 19, 2007 2:11:14 PM

Post a comment