BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
'Classified' Iraq Corruption Report Posted Online
September 27, 2007 10:51 AM
The State Department thinks the Iraqi government is larded with corrupt officials who protect their own at the expense of their country. But they don't want you to know they think that.
Amid a clash with Congress over details on the problem of corruption in Iraq, the State Department classified a previously unclassified new report which details the pervasiveness of fraud, intimidation and misdirection within Iraqi ministries.
However, the "Secret" stamp appears to have come down too late: a watchdog group obtained an early version of the report, stamped "Sensitive but Unclassified," and published it online.
Iraqi officials' malfeasance undermines the legitimacy of the Iraqi government and hamstrings its anti-corruption efforts, according to the version of the State Department report posted by the Federation of American Scientists, the group which made the document public.
"Currently, Iraq is not capable of even rudimentary enforcement of anti-corruption laws," it states.
How bad is it? The anti-corruption advisor to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki refuses to disclose his own financial holdings, the report says. Routine investigative reports by government anti-corruption watchdogs "cannot be trusted to truthfully reveal criminal activity against anyone protected by the violent or the powerful."
The report, which was first disclosed by the Nation magazine, details problems in nearly two dozen Iraqi government ministries as well as nongovernmental organizations.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists said he had not been contacted by the State Department about the report, which he posted to his group's Web site on Wednesday.
"No one has asked me to take it down," Aftergood told the Blotter on ABCNews.com, "and in the absence of a persuasive security rationale, we wouldn't."
The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The department classified the report in the middle of a spat with House Government Reform and Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif. Waxman has been pressing the State Department to make several documents and officials available for a hearing on corruption in Iraq, including the anti-corruption report.
Waxman has postponed his hearing on the topic to Oct. 4.
Click Here to Register to Receive Blotter Alerts.
September 27, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (48)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The most glaring thing about this is that the failed STATE DEPARTMENT could say the exact same things about the loser in the WHITEWASH HOUSE, and his regime. So I guess we have the trickle down theory in play here...
Posted by: daddy | Sep 27, 2007 11:52:25 AM
Internal memo from FX: "We're starting to look like full-fledged idiots in our support for this moron. Let's turn it down until the bad new passes."
Posted by: Murdoch | Sep 27, 2007 12:26:08 PM
The drive-by media ought to stop publishing all this Anti-Iraq stuff soon...otherwise the Democrats that y'all support will be mighty angry if they take office in 09'. CAUSE GUESS WHAT...they ain't pulling out of Iraq...they've known this all along! The Democrats and the drive-bys have duped millions of you foil-hat wearing fools!
Posted by: Gunpowder | Sep 27, 2007 12:26:14 PM
They should really look-up to the current US asministration for lessons on anticorruption. /sarcasm
Posted by: tony hart | Sep 27, 2007 12:38:48 PM
Their congress is full of corrupt rich people looking out for their own personal interests? Big surprise! Look who they're modeled after!
Posted by: Guy D | Sep 27, 2007 12:41:39 PM
Is there any wonder why? After all they have had the best of those who have perfected corruption to learn from.
Posted by: GC | Sep 27, 2007 12:45:28 PM
I'm sure those in Washington are quite experienced with corruption.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | Sep 27, 2007 12:55:57 PM
"Our administration is concerned about deficits, and the way they deal with deficits is you want to control spending. And I hope Congress lives up to their words. When they talk about deficits, they can join us in making sure we don't overspend. They can join us and make sure that the appropriations process is focused on those issues that -- those items that are absolutely necessary to the American people. I'm pleased that members of the Congress are talking about deficits. It means they understand their obligations not to overspend the people's money."
President Bush
The Cost of Iraq War calculator is set to reach $456 billion September 30, 2007, the end of fiscal year 2007. The Cost of Iraq War calculator is occasionally reset based on new information and new allocations of funding. The numbers include military and non-military spending, such as reconstruction. Spending only includes incremental costs, additional funds that are expended due to the war. For example, soldiers' regular pay is not included, but combat pay is included. Potential future costs, such as future medical care for soldiers and veterans wounded in the war, are not included. It is also not clear whether the current funding will cover all military wear and tear. It also does not account for the Iraq War being deficit-financed and that taxpayers will need to make additional interest payments on the national debt due to those deficits.
Question: Where are the bad guy(s)?
Iraq is a mess!
Posted by: sue from texas` | Sep 27, 2007 1:15:12 PM
Uhhh, Gunpowder....I hope you're not really serious with your comment. Of course the Democrats will not be able to fully pull out of Iraq. We, as a nation (Democrats,Republicans and Independants )are stuck in Iraq. Because we were led into what the administration thought would be an easy victory we are now stuck there and cannot pull out and leave them to their own devices. It would be immoral for us to do so, and a serious startegic mistake. We made this mess, and now we must pay. The real dilemma here is that we have placed ourselves in jeopardy as a nation. We know we are going to have to face a real battle (possibly nuclear)with the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Pakistan and Shia fascism in Iran. We have squandered our valuable resources (our brave men and women serving in a volunteer military), not to mention the billions of dollars that could have been used to solidify our military force in the face of these new challanges. We're also lucky that North Korea has backed down for the time being. So hey! Have some common sense will ya? It's got nothing to do with political party affiliations, and everything to do with knowing that the Iraq war strategy has been a total failure. We replaced a stable, sectarian middle eastern country (totalitarian yes, but stable)with a corrupt and an unstable beeding ground for Islamofascists. But hey, at least our contractor are making some money.
Posted by: Dave Davenport | Sep 27, 2007 2:18:50 PM
I don't know which is worse. The fact that the White House has been caught lying once again, or the fact that they are classifying reports for political purposes to keep us from finding out that they are lying to us.
Posted by: Tammy Stickers | Sep 27, 2007 2:56:03 PM
Now our boys an girls in Iraq, who are being maimed, know they are at least throwing their lives and futures away for more than one corrupt government. That should be of some small consolation to their parents and Fox News.
Posted by: geneonlbk | Sep 27, 2007 3:04:59 PM
We MUST start making plans NOW on how to get our troops out of Iraq safely, and plan what to do after they withdraw. I would like to see a full diplomatic effort to try to broker some kind of deal between the various Iraqi factions and I would like peacekeepers placed in Iraq to help protect the innocents as our troops withdraw. I would be willing to support US military as part of peacekeeping unit (to help clean up the mess WE made), but I do not support a continuation of the present course.
Posted by: Marilyn | Sep 27, 2007 3:07:49 PM
Lets get it straight who's lying and whose just covering their tails. This is a report made by THE STATE DEPARTMENT, not President Bush. If it had come form him, it would have his name all over it. The first failure here is of officials not knowing what to classify and when. Frankly, there are a lot of things the public DOES NOT NEED to know. All deference to my good bud Stevie After-your-goods, but making a living off of leaking info, whether that info has any relevance or causes an embarassement to the government or not, well,... too bad he couldn't have gotten a real job all those years ago.
Posted by: Don | Sep 27, 2007 3:26:27 PM
Bush and Cheney are war criminals, plain and simple. We didn't go into Iraq for any purpose any nobler than to control the oil in the region. That was what Osama bin Laden wanted to do; it's why Saddam Hussein could never have been an ally with OBL, and it is why there are now 14 permanent bases built or being built in Iraq - we are never leaving. . As an honorably discharged Army veteran, it is very hard for me to have to say that.
Posted by: bob crawford | Sep 27, 2007 3:27:13 PM
When we see the people of Myanmar marching in protest against a corrupt and inept regime, many of us think of ourselves as being far removed from the events depicted in the news. The truth is that our own government treats the law and citizens of this land with complete disdain. If we will not march in the streets in protest, at least we can hope that more than 50% of the US voters will turn out next year and prevent our leaders in Washington from forgetting who they represent.
Posted by: Diogenes | Sep 27, 2007 3:32:53 PM
It is an easy read if you stay away from the MAINSCREAM media and ferret out your own news. NEWSFLASH-shelf life on embassy being built in Iraq???? 30 years...Years before the Downing St.Memo is reported again by the MAINSCREAM media...don't hold your breath...number of scares reported by MAINSCREAM media before November 2008????...don't want to know and counting...
Posted by: daddy | Sep 27, 2007 3:38:25 PM
Could it be that our beloved "President" has lied to us AGAIN? How shocking.
Posted by: eric donovan | Sep 27, 2007 4:22:07 PM
Let Bush explain.
Posted by: eric | Sep 27, 2007 4:39:12 PM
Fox News finally calls it a day. Get out the puppets.
Posted by: Murdoch | Sep 27, 2007 4:48:17 PM
I cannot brook those who parrot the "We can't leave Iraq because... yadda, yadda, yadda." Like hell we can't leave.... Matter of fact, just enact compulsory military service and we'll be out of there so fast it'll make your head swim. But, as long as we can sit on our fat, lazy arses here at home and it's only the "volunteers" who are coming home in boxes... we'll continue the same old boloney. Get out now! There is nothing in the Mideast (oil and Israel included) that are worth the life of my next door neighbor's kid.
Posted by: Dutch | Sep 27, 2007 4:50:30 PM
Post a comment
