BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
Old Spies Never Die; They Just Outlast Political Bosses
September 14, 2007 4:18 PM
A longtime CIA hand who resigned in November 2004 rather than bow to what he viewed as unprofessional management has returned from retirement to head the National Clandestine Service and to again work directly for the man who had resigned alongside him.
On Friday, CIA director Gen. Michael V. Hayden sent a message to the agency workforce heralding the return of Michael Sulick as director of the National Clandestine Service, the operational branch of the nearly 20,000-employee agency that is home to its approximately 2,000 spies and reports officers.
The 2004 resignation of Sulick, then an assistant deputy director for operations, was well-documented at the time, as was that of his boss, Steve Kappes, whose rank then was deputy director for Ooerations -- the same job Sulick will now hold.
Hayden's first very public move upon his appointment as head of the spy agency in May 2006 was to announce the return of Kappes. The move was widely viewed inside the agency as a statement of Hayden's intent to restore professionalism and morale.
At the time the resignations occurred, they were characterized in the press and by multiple ABC News sources as part of an open rebellion by senior- and middle-level intelligence officials against the manners and methods of then-CIA Director Porter Goss' hand-picked deputies, particularly chief of staff Patrick Murray.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
In addition to Kappes and Sulick putting in their papers, the confrontations also led to the resignation that November of John McLaughlin, a 32-year CIA veteran who was deputy director, the post Kappes now holds. McLaughlin resigned after warning Goss that Murray, a former Capitol Hill staff member, was "treating senior officials disrespectfully," the Washington Post noted.
Sulick's return comes following the internal announcement that Jose Rodriguez, the most recent head of the operational branch, has decided to retire.
Sulick has served the spy agency as assistant deputy director for counterintelligence, chief of station in New York and in Moscow and as head of a Langley-based "Russia House" that oversaw a variety of Soviet bloc operations.
"I am very happy to announce that Michael J. Sulick has accepted my offer to head the National Clandestine Service. A 25-year veteran of CIA, Mike is a familiar figure to many of you," a memo signed by Hayden stated. "He has spent more than a decade in assignments abroad for the Agency, including senior command positions. Mike has also excelled in crucial assignments here at Headquarters."
Since his retirement, Sulick has been a consultant to private business and has lectured on intelligence topics at universities, agencies and corporations, the memo noted.
"Mike will be a powerful addition," Hayden's memo said. "He knows that espionage demands constant change and adaptation. His commitment to the men and women who do the difficult job of intelligence -- his determination to create the conditions for excellence -- is profound and enduring."
Click Here to Register to Receive Blotter Alerts.
September 14, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (3)
Welcome back. Please find Osama.
Posted by: jim jones | Sep 14, 2007 6:38:31 PM
Well, that's two good moves at CIA in one day: the public announcement of a ban on waterboarding and the return of a widely respected pro who had resigned on principle.
One of the facts that gives me continued faith in the basic, underlying goodness of this country is that the CIA apparently had to interview almost three hundred of their own people before they found about 14 to conduct the "enhanced interrogation" program and, unless I'm mistaken, two or three of them have openly expressed regret and doubt in recent years.
Hopefully this all indicates a sensible sea change, a ray of adulthood in a dim sky of juvenalia.
Posted by: Kent Mueller | Sep 15, 2007 3:53:13 AM
Some questions:
I'm not sure how to tell the 'good' CIA guys–and intel folks from other agencies–from the 'bad' ones--I'm sure there are both. What's the difference between those ('good') who give the country proper intel vs. competitors and enemies, and those ('bad') who oversee the renditions of (fairly obviously) innocent foreigners to other countries for outsourced torturing? And depending on your level of cyncism, add drug running, domestic media manipulation, mind control, and so on. We had a load of old dirty laundry from the '60s and '70s and so on aired with the release of the 'family jewels'. What reason is there to believe any similar operations and activities now have stopped? In fact, don't we all generally assume they are continuing--isn't that what the controversy over domestic spying (a la the NSA) is about?
I DO see the return to a professional cadre as better then having politicized folks running the CIA(especially under Bush/Cheney's administration), but this also had the feel of a 'don't worry about the CIA, everything's back in the hands of "GOOD" guys' message to it. I'm sure there is a legitimate basis for this story, but 'feel good' reassuring stories about the CIA make me suspicious.
We have to remember that, although we need good, effective, professionally run intelligence agencies, GIVEN THEIR TRACK RECORD, we need to watch them very very closely.
Unfortunately, the better they are, the more that's so.
Posted by: Steve Hathaway | Sep 16, 2007 9:00:16 AM
Post a comment
