« Previous | Main | Next »

U.S. Intel Official Faces Critics Over Spy Satellites

September 06, 2007 8:52 AM

Usinteloffici_mn_2 The Homeland Security Department's top intelligence official is expected to face a tough audience on Capitol Hill Thursday when he testifies on a plan to expand the domestic use of spy satellites to aid counterterrorism operations, law enforcement, emergency response efforts and scientific research.

DHS Chief Intelligence Officer Charles E. Allen has insisted that all of the "relevant committees" in Congress were briefed on the plan to create a permanent office for sharing satellite data with federal, state and local officials operating within the United States. Since 1975, such satellite data has been shared selectively with officials who make specific requests for the information.

But some who should have heard about the program say they discovered it only last month from reading the newspapers.

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

"Unfortunately, I have had to rely on media reports to gain information about this endeavor," a chagrined Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, wrote DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff two weeks ago. He called the situation "unacceptable."

Allen is expected to assure Thompson and the committee the proposed new office will safeguard Americans' privacy and civil liberties. Daniel W. Sutherland, the department's top civil liberties official, will testify in support of Allen's claims, according to an advance copy of his testimony obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com.

Thompson and the committee will hear from a skeptic as well. Lisa Graves, a former Justice Department official, will testify to her serious concerns about the proposed office.

The special commission whose 2005 study recommended the office had some provocative ideas that deserve closer scrutiny, according to Graves, now an expert with the nonpartisan Center for National Security Studies.

The commission criticized concerns over "individual civil liberties" and the protection of intelligence sources and methods as hallmarks of a "risk-averse" environment, according to Graves.

The commission came out in favor of using satellite technology to allow U.S. authorities to conduct warrantless "aerial searches of private property," sophisticated aerial mapping of building interiors and other surveillance, according to an advance copy of Graves' testimony obtained by ABCNews.com.

Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?

September 6, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (9)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Math puzzles most Americans which is why they don't understand that the octogenarians they keep counting on starts at 71 years of age. I say buy all the stock of DEPENDS company you can get, sprinkle it with defense and war profiteer companies and ladle it down with pharmaceuticals and tell your children...FUTURE????...what FUTURE???? have you not heard of the RAPTURE yet?????

Posted by: daddy | Sep 6, 2007 10:52:22 AM

Hey, let them look at my back yard. It's like driving down the street and peeping in my yard. Also they can follow my car to the grocery store, I don't care. Only if I was going to do something illegal would I care. If this will help protect me, then yes, spy away!!!!

Posted by: DJ | Sep 6, 2007 11:44:57 AM

National Review has written an editorial regarding the National Applications Office

Posted by: Jeff | Sep 6, 2007 12:17:23 PM

If Homeland Security can see the interior of buildings inside the United States from satelliets than why were told we had to invade Iraq because they were "hiding" the WMDs inside
buildings and bunkers which we supposedly could not penetrate with our satellite technology?
Why doesn't the news media investigate
exactly what this technology can and cannot do because we keep getting conflicting information from the government depending who they want to spy on with this stuff.
The news media never asks why
Iraq was so "impenetrable" to US spy satellites if we can see what Joe six- pack is hiding in his basement
with no problem.

Posted by: rex | Sep 6, 2007 1:41:56 PM

We've ample evidence that any new power we give the state will be abused. This real-time satellite imaging stuff is like giving the government god-like power to watch over you at any time, wherever you go.

Squeenter can see this as being a worthwhile tool in certain circumstances, like for border patrol and in cases where police already have a search warrant and are planning a raid, but I suspects this program will be abused in the same ways other powers the gov't has assumed since 9/11 have been.

There are many power-drunk officials who aren't the least bit concerned with violating your rights. Do you want the crooked local official with a grudge to be able to spy on you at all hours, without any legitimate reason at all? Do you trust the government?

If this technology is to be used at all, it should be highly restricted to certain types of cases, and it should require a warrant from the relevant court.

Posted by: squeenter squillo | Sep 7, 2007 12:52:52 AM

I hate when people say things like only if you are going to do something illegal should it matter. That is a cop-out and you all know it. I am a former US Marine and I live my life by the codes I was taught while in the service. HONOR, COURAGE, COMMITMENT! I took an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic! So did all of these elected officials at some point in their careers. So did the president! The constitution is the Supreme law in America and it can be changed and shifted but, it was never meant to be gotten rid of and executive orders and bills like this erode at the very core of this already rotting society. Wake up ladies and gentlemen its time to exercise your rights and SPEAK OUT AND FIGHT IF NEED BE!

Posted by: Ezra | Sep 7, 2007 4:28:01 PM

I think it is a absolute disgrace that the NBC "To Catch A Predator" sting is under fire. I am sick and tired of hearing about the rights of obvious criminals.
If there is to be a zero tolerance stance on anything in this country it should be on child predators and child pornagraphy. How dare DA John Roach dismiss charges on all those animals! I believe Roach should be immediatly removed from his position. The people who he serves should be outraged!
Even if the talk with Chris Hansen during the sting was for television, it served an important purpose, especially in Murphy Texas. Because of Roach, these pigs would have walked free to molest other children without their identity being exposed. At least the chat with Chris Hansen exposed them to the country, their family and friends for who they are. Hopefully their lives are ruined.
And one more thing. The assistant d.a. (the person who was supposed to protect our children) that shot and killed himself did the children and people of this country a big favor. The nerve of anyone to say this went bad!

Posted by: John | Sep 8, 2007 8:54:38 AM

US Intel is already illegally spying on millions of Americans within the privacy of their homes.

The NSA has been doing so since the early 1980's, through its Signals Intelligence progam, and committed the most egregious violations against the 4Th Amendment ever documented.

Posted by: American TI | Jul 8, 2008 12:45:18 PM

The FBI is also involved in such extensive and treasonous criminality.

A truly garbage organization.

Posted by: Jim | Jul 8, 2008 12:48:45 PM

Post a comment