BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Withheld Report Faults Bureaucrats' Fancy Travel
September 13, 2007 10:58 AM
Department of Commerce employees may have spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars on improper first- and business-class travel, according to a report obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com.
In a survey of several dozen premium-class trips taken by Commerce officials in 2005 and 2006, roughly two out of three were not properly authorized, the agency's inspector general concluded.
The report was completed in March and distributed to congressional offices but was not made public. The office released the report Thursday, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by ABC News. The public version of the report is unredacted, and no explanation was given for why it was withheld.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Commerce officials took 630 business-class trips from October 2004 to May 2006, costing a total of $2.8 million, according to the report. Department officials also took 11 first-class trips, although the inspector general's report does not disclose the cost of that travel.
Reviewing a sample of 63 trips, auditors found only 14 were properly authorized. The others were approved by officials without authorization to do so, were improperly justified or lacked the proper paperwork, the investigators found. The report blamed "poor internal controls" and "outdated...guidance" for the problems.
In its response, the department agreed with those findings and said it was taking steps to correct those issues.
Ironically, the inspector general responsible for discovering the improper travel, Johnnie E. Frazier, resigned in June, facing multiple investigations into numerous allegations of abuse and mismanagement, including that he fraudulently charged the government for improper travel. Frazier has declined to comment on the charges.
Commerce Department officials are not the only government employees who have been found to have taken improper premium-class trips.
The State Department did not properly authorize or justify nearly two-thirds of $140 million in premium-class travel for its officials between April 2003 and September 2004, the Government Accountability Office concluded last year.
In a separate study, the GAO also found problems with nearly all of the Defense Department's premium-class travel for 2001 and 2002, which cost taxpayers almost $124 million.
Click Here to Register to Receive Blotter Alerts.
September 13, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (10)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
It's Bush's fault again--I think he should look at every expense report the government has and sign off on it. Everything else is his fault, right Dems
Posted by: brian | Sep 13, 2007 11:39:44 AM
typical of our government. of the peope for the people...yeah right!
Posted by: alporfido | Sep 13, 2007 12:24:48 PM
Pretty much right on Brian...your side has failed badly so admit it...OK????
The symbiotic relationship between the airlines and the government(big business also) is a fascinating story of little marketing gimmicks like this. They love each other so much that bushbaby helped the airlines avoid the tragic publicity that the airlines were responsible for the airport security on 911 in Boston, Portland, and everywhere in the USA. Anybody notice????
Posted by: daddy | Sep 13, 2007 12:33:50 PM
Anyone whose job requires Senate confirmation should be flying business class as a matter of course, and that includes flag officers.
Cattle class is uncomfortable and impossible to work in most times. Obviously not all, but most people at that level will either use the time to work, or rest for the next meeting.
Posted by: ntsc | Sep 13, 2007 12:43:58 PM
daddy
re your comment that the airlines were responsible for airport security.
So what? There is no evidence any of the hijackers were carrying anything contriband. The week after 9/11 I checked my carry on (in 2000 I did 100,000 miles plus) and discovered three knives. I only knew about one of them, the others were in office or tool kits.
Posted by: ntsc | Sep 13, 2007 1:59:49 PM
So the Inspector General who uncovered this fraud and abuse resigned after allegations of his own fraud and abuse?
Sounds like typical Bushie payback to me.
Posted by: PTF | Sep 13, 2007 4:09:27 PM
of course its Bush's fault. He has loyal "Bushies" in all the major positions in the commerce department, and after 6+ years you would think by now they could get the corruption out, but nope.
Posted by: Steve Savage | Sep 14, 2007 4:31:35 AM
Dear ABC! What is this..the more you find the more you unskirt..be careful for what is there...many of us citizens who have learned the hard way of those who destroy the little guy...just a woman who looks at this, as much as I believe in You beaware I have grown tired of the contacts of said government that lacks worth and trust..when one finds themselves being beaten up, their are more powerful forces to exclude independance and trust...take a look at what I tell..its based on your revealing the truths that signal what we have become in today's world with so lkittle help! Exposing the lies, the sins of men..soesn't really shake us down again...we are so aware..so intuitive and resilient to keep our dreams and hopes aware that this government has fallen down...BE AWARE! Apachecheynne! Good Coverage!
Posted by: Apachecheynne | Sep 14, 2007 10:36:38 AM
Loyal "Bushie" Johnnie E. Frazier was appointed on July 20, 1999, which, I guess, would make him a loyal "Clintonista". According to his official government bio:
"Mr. Frazier’s presidential appointment as Inspector General caps his more than 3 decades of distinguished public service, during which time he has helped shape the full range of OIG activities and operations—performance and financial audits, domestic and international inspections, program and systems evaluations, as well as serving in key leadership and management functions."
That's three decades of "distinguished public service".
Abuses of this nature usually are committed by government careerists who, after watching elected officials come and go through the years, somehow feel they are above the rules they write for everybody else. The civil service system provides a fertile field for such abuse.
Posted by: SukieTawdry | Sep 14, 2007 2:25:00 PM
As an overseas USG employee required to travel frequently, there is another side to this story. I do not condone skirting the regs; however, please know that travel lasting for 10, 15, 20 hours can be torcher, and that's before adding a few kids, and body ailments to the equation. Business-class, in this regard is not luxurious, it only makes it more bearable. Also assignment and termination travel generally requires one to check and carry on lots of extra baggage. In addition to traditional hand luggage, we must also hand-carry all important documents, e.g. school and medical records, x-rays, birth/marriage certificates, travel docs, etc. Overseas employees sacrifice a lot living in foreign countries that CONUS USG employees take for granted and we shouldn't be judged unfairly when legitimately utilizing business (never 1st) class travel within regulatory parameters. Some agencies don't allow premium travel ever-- regardless of length of flight, etc, so, many employees-- myself included-- choose to upgrade ourselves and our family members at own expense even though we on traveling for officisl business. Because we don't maintain US residences year-round just for bi-annual home leave visits, we also spend thousands in hoteland car rental, and food expenses. I detest "fraud, waste, and abuse," but believe me when I say, it's almost always the regular guys who lose because the higher ups abuse.
Posted by: Liz | Oct 2, 2007 8:54:08 PM
Post a comment
