BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Blackwater: Shoot First, Face Questions Later, Committee Says
October 01, 2007 5:16 PM
Blackwater USA personnel have injured and killed Iraqi civilians and often fired without provocation, in apparent violation of U.S. laws and government guidelines, according to a memo released Monday by investigators for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
According to Blackwater and State Department reports, Blackwater security personnel in Iraq are the most violence-prone of all military contractors working for the State Department in Iraq, the committee found. The firm's president will face a hearing before the committee Tuesday.
Blackwater, one of three private military contractors working for the State Department, "reports more shooting incidents than the other two contractors combined" between January 2005 and May 2007, the committee said in the memo.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
Overall, the firm's soldiers-for-hire, working on contract to the U.S. government, have engaged in at least 195 shooting incidents in Iraq since 2005, the committee said. In 84 percent of such incidents, the committee said, Blackwater personnel fired first. The other firms, Dyncorp and Triple Canopy, reported shooting first in 62 percent and 83 percent of their incidents, respectively.
State Department policy and U.S. law requires contractors to "engage in defensive uses of force" only to prevent "imminent and grave danger" to themselves or others, according to the committee's memo. But "the vast majority of Blackwater weapons discharges are preemptive," before the company's guards receive any incoming fire, the committee found.
Blackwater did not respond to a request for comment on the memo. A company spokesperson told ABC News on Friday that comparisons between his company and other security contractors were not valid because Blackwater escorts more convoys than other firms and do so in more dangerous areas.
Asked to comment on the memo, a Triple Canopy spokesperson said in an e-mailed statement that "Triple Canopy's mission is to protect lives and property with minimal use of force and the company always operates with this principle in mind."
Veritas Capital, owner of Dyncorp, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The committee said its new findings are based on a review of internal State Department documents and Blackwater records. The panel, chaired by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., is scheduled to hold a hearing on Blackwater's activities in Iraq and Afghanistan Tuesday, Oct. 2. Blackwater president Erik Prince is expected to testify, according to the committee, along with several State Department officials.
Since 2001, Blackwater has received more than $1 billion in contract work for the U.S. government, most of which it was awarded without competitive bidding, according to the committee. Blackwater's record, compiled by its own staff, reflect at least 16 confirmed Iraqi casualties and 162 incidents of damaged property as a result of their employees' actions, the committee found.
Click Here to Register to Receive Blotter Alerts.
Those figures do not include the Sept. 16 shootout involving Blackwater personnel which left at least 10 Iraqis dead and several wounded. Blackwater said its personnel were fired upon, and they responded in self-defense, but evidence cited by Iraqi police appears to contradict the claim.
Before that clash, which led the Iraqi government to attempt to bar Blackwater from operating in its country, the firm's personnel had been involved in several other violent and even fatal clashes, the committee said.
A State Department e-mail said that in June 2005, Blackwater personnel were involved in shooting an Iraqi man in the chest, then failed to report the incident and tried to cover it up, the committee found.
In October 2005, a Blackwater employee on a protection mission near Mosul inadvertently shot a bystander while trying to stop an advancing car, the committee's memo details. Blackwater reported the "shooting and probab[le] killing," the committee memo states. Blackwater did not respond to an inquiry regarding these incidents or the fates of the personnel involved.
In another incident which has been previously reported, an allegedly drunk 26-year-old Blackwater employee shot and killed a security guard to the Iraqi vice president on Christmas Eve in 2006. Blackwater fired the man and flew him home the next day, one of 122 employees who once worked on State Department contract which the firm has fired, according to the committee's statistics.
"As of today, nine months after the shooting, no charges have been brought relating to the killing of the Iraqi Vice President's guard," the committee’s memo states.
At a press briefing Monday afternoon, State Department spokesman Tom Casey declined comment, saying he had not seen the memo.
This post has been updated.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
October 1, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (38)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Navy SEALs are considered an elite force. The connections between Blackwater and Navy SEALs seems to be a concern for some people. Are Blackwater personnel sticking to core SEALs values?
More on this in the article ...
"Navy SEALs, Marines use positive human traits and virtues for success"
Posted by: Hammo | Oct 1, 2007 7:39:24 PM
Those who have covered-up for Blackwater in the State Dept. seem to think the Blackwater victims don't matter - because they are Arabs. It's that type of institutional attitude by the US government that leads to many Arabs hating us in Iraq and elsewhere.
Posted by: Chris Baker | Oct 2, 2007 12:29:12 AM
Checks and Balances, remove them and you have yourself an uncontrolable entity, like a teenager without supervision.
Posted by: not in | Oct 2, 2007 7:43:45 AM
Considering there are more contractors in Iraq than military personnel, this is just another example of the giant gravy train that is the war in Iraq. We have paid Blackwater over $1 billion? That is a lot of money people. Can you say re-distribution of wealth? From us to them. Nice.
Posted by: rewire1 | Oct 2, 2007 8:56:11 AM
Blackwater has had over one billion dollars in no-bid contracts with the US government. That's quite a return on their campaign contributions to the republican party.
Posted by: gmanj7 | Oct 2, 2007 9:30:45 AM
Blackwater is providing a service that is a necessity in Iraq. That being said there is no excuse for these actions. I believe there should be some major investigations into how they have received these contracts. I am willing to bet that someones pockets on capital hill are getting fat. That will answer the questions to how these actions have been swept unfortunately swept under the rug!
Posted by: Jeremyt | Oct 2, 2007 9:42:13 AM
Its called getting the job done.
We're not there. They are.
.
Posted by: havoc888 | Oct 2, 2007 9:44:55 AM
Corruption, handing out No bid contracts, no accountability, no respect for the people, wasteful spending... I could just go on.
This government is more of a threat to the US people than Iran or Syria.
Is there a law that says if both the executive and the legislative branch of the govt. fail to represent the people then we get to kick them out and hold them responsible for their actions?
Posted by: Kilroy was here | Oct 2, 2007 9:47:16 AM
Blackwater - Mission not accomplished! For 1 Billion Dollars my expectations would be that Osama would be incarcerated today. The task seems to be too much for this group; killing innocent individuals and covering up is not acceptable. Mission not accomplished!
Posted by: sue from texas | Oct 2, 2007 9:55:05 AM
This Blackwater thing is going to end up big. There is far more to it than meets the eye...
Posted by: DaveM | Oct 2, 2007 9:55:10 AM
What about all the other contracted killers we have there? As guilty as Blackwater is, I think they are being made a scapegoat while the SAME THING CONTINUES with other murderous corporate outfits.
Posted by: RW | Oct 2, 2007 9:57:40 AM
Blackwater's problems should not be a reflection on the military service's their employees happen to come from. It seems they haven't been doing a good job of checking references for some of their hire. The star shooter in the famous/infamous "An Najaf Turkey Shoot" Video was a case in point.
He was kicked off the Navy Seals and is an embarrassment to the Special Forces community by promoting himself as such.
When there is one bad apple that shouldn't have been in the basket, would expected to be more.
Posted by: Joe | Oct 2, 2007 10:12:37 AM
Well, first let's ask ourselves a question? Who are the insurgents or terrorists, whatever you want to call them. Are they the americans or arabs?
Who blows up people, cars and buildings?
Posted by: Kathy | Oct 2, 2007 10:33:16 AM
I have an uncle who was a NAVY SEAL and at a recent reunion my uncle learned that he has little in common with the modern NAVY SEAL. I heard the sadness in his voice and now i get to see a picture of one of these modern day seals...bark like a seal torture grease...
Posted by: daddy | Oct 2, 2007 11:10:22 AM
Sounds like these Blackwater executives should be brought up on war crimes and murder charges.
Posted by: Chris | Oct 2, 2007 11:17:24 AM
As a two-time US Marine Corps combat veteran, I think its laughable that "Monday Morning Quarterbacks" who have never placed themselves in harms way would have the audacity to question the actions of some that has. In no uncertain terms to condone the alleged criminal behavior of Blackwater Personnel, many of whom served in the Special Operations community. Just as the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) governed their conduct while they were in the military, federal law should govern their conduct as civilians. Violate and suffer the consequences. In short, don't be so quick to judge.
Posted by: USMCInfantry | Oct 2, 2007 11:25:16 AM
Hire mercenaries, get thugs.
Posted by: Jordan | Oct 2, 2007 12:13:59 PM
I would not believe one word presented by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Mr Waxman is a chronic whiner, he and Schumer, Levin, Fiengold, Fienstein, Boxer and the rest of the whiners should be impeached. I guess this clown Waxman did not realize it was Blackwater personnel that protected him during his visit to Iraq. Next time just give him a gun and let this clown defend himself.
Posted by: Jake | Oct 2, 2007 12:16:44 PM
Most of the comments here are from people who don't have a clue as to what they are talking about. All they know is what they have heard from bias news media reports, and propaganda from all types of unreliable sources, one of which being the so called 'reporter' Jeremy Scahill who wrote the book about Blackwater USA. Most people don't know that he is a confirmed left wing Socialist, working for the Socialist media outlet 'The Nation'. I think before you Hammer Blackwater so hard you should see where all this is coming from and why...It really doesn't have a whole lot to do with the way Blackwater specialist protect their diplomats, but more the political means to suit the desired result that can be played by the left.
Posted by: PROTECTION SPECIALIST | Oct 2, 2007 5:49:34 PM
these people are in a war torn country and yet you want them to act like they were in the USA?
come on now.They are defending people and themselves when anyone can walk up to them with a bomb strapped to themselves.
sorry, this is a non story.bet if it was a abc reporter over there depending on these people to protect them, they wouldnt be so biased against them.
Posted by: darknessesedge | Oct 2, 2007 8:08:16 PM
Post a comment
