BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Troopergate Probe OK, AK Supremes Say
- Todd Palin Pushed Firing for Years, Probe Told
- Let's Get Ready to Rumble!
- Todd Speaks! (Kind of)
- Palin Aides to Testify
- Troopergate Heads to High Court
- Troopergate Suits Tossed
- Another Private Palin Email Account?
- Probe Challenges Head to Court
- Troopergate Suit "Political, Not Legal," Lawmakers Charge
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
Surveillance Battle: House Panel Aims at Telcos
October 02, 2007 4:07 PM
Telecommunications giants AT&T, Verizon and Qwest are facing a congressional inquiry into the industry's cooperation with a secret government surveillance program some say was illegal.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee gave the companies until Oct. 12 to provide answers to questions on "reported efforts by government agencies to obtain information about customers' telephone and Internet use," according to a release from the panel Tuesday announcing its investigation.
"Congress has a duty...to examine the difficult position of the phone companies who may have been asked by the government to violate the privacy of their customers without the assurance of liability protections," said committee chairman John Dingell, D-Mich., according to the release.
At least four other congressional panels have mounted investigations into the program, dubbed the "Terrorist Surveillance Program" by the White House. Those have mostly focused on the Bush administration's role in the program.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Verizon spokesman Peter Thonis said his company would respond "as best we can" to the panel's request. Qwest and AT&T did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Qwest declined to comment, although the company has previously stated it declined to participate in the program, despite overtures from the administration.
The House inquiry is the first time telco giants have faced public congressional scrutiny over the program since June 2006, when then-Senate Judiciary chairman Arlen Specter, R-Penn., vowed to subpoena AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth executives to testify on their companies' role in the program.
Specter scuttled the hearing at the last minute, after Vice President Dick Cheney intervened with private assurances the White House would entertain Republican-backed legislation to amend the program.
Telcos face several state and federal lawsuits over their role in the program. The firms have reportedly banded together with the White House to lobby Congress to pass a law to retroactively legalize all cooperation the firms have provided intelligence agencies.
Click here to read the letter to ATT
Click here to read the letter to Qwest
Click here to read the letter to Verizon
This story has been revised.
Click Here to Register for Blotter Alerts.
October 2, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (11)
is it true that dick cheney had the popular pinky and the brain spielsberg cartoon canselled because of the close likenes of himself as the meglomanic brain, and george bush as pinky?
Posted by: robert miller | Oct 2, 2007 4:54:25 PM
Its the Govts fault for going into the wiretapping and seizing of records. The companies thought that complying was the right thing to do. If the Govt contacted your firm and demanded access, would you argue, given their previous detention of people without any evidence or any trial for months or years in gitanamo? seriously.
Posted by: Noonie | Oct 2, 2007 5:40:19 PM
A large corporation is capable of defending itself and it's officers. Corporate accountability is necessary if we are to have a country of laws and not men. No ex post facto lawsshould be passed to expunge culpability. In the future, then, if the Executive branch wishes to exceed it's present authority,it will go to Congress and get the authority. If this to be a nation of lawsnot of men, those who break the law must be held accountable. The Fourth ammendment is central to ourliberty, and Liberty is ultimately our only security. The Founders understood that and soon, God willing , will the cowardly execs at SBC, I mean ATT.
Posted by: philip Berg | Oct 3, 2007 7:09:25 AM
How many other major U.S. corporations serve as front companies for the government/intelligence apparatus?
Posted by: John | Oct 3, 2007 11:11:27 AM
Must we be dragged into the swamp of
"we have been advised not to cooperate" republican reindeer games? issue an order for the attorneys involved in this issue on behalf of the companys -not the legal eagles involved in active cases- but the in house and outside review council (if any) as to the compliance ,or lack there of, with federal and state regulations. and laws, and have them explain what they have helped to do and remind them they can not refuse to do as instructed by supeona and that there is no grant of executive privledge or order from a federal agency or entity that can be used to excuse them from or shield them from compliance, and mandate the un-diluted production of any and all documents required by the committee.
LOCK UP A FEW CEO's and see how quik they cough up witnesses and paperwork.
Posted by: thomas williams | Oct 3, 2007 11:32:26 AM
Thomas Williams has the RIGHT IDEA! Threatening the Rich, Pampered, Lying, Dishonorable, Theiving, Deceitful BOYS WITH BUBBA IN A 6 X 8 CELL WOULD LOOSEN THEIR SNAKE TONGUES!
Posted by: Joseph Conrad | Oct 3, 2007 7:27:49 PM
So, since congress lacks the will to hold either the administration or themselves they want to hold the telcos responsible for not standing up to unlawfull government requests. How much "oversight" from the FCC would it take before a telco started losing money? I'm sure there were never any explicit threats just implications.
Posted by: BooMan | Oct 4, 2007 2:05:55 PM
So what the hell is everyone afraid of? Ah, we don't want the little lady to find out about (?) Come on people.. get over it.
Posted by: steve | Oct 5, 2007 7:11:01 PM
Actually, Qwest denied the NSA the records that they sought. Look what has happened to Qwest CEO as the result of that refusal. Typical Bush politics. Bush & Cheney should be impeached and then fairly tried and simply locked up for the rest of their lives.
Posted by: bob | Oct 13, 2007 9:21:54 AM
Dems caved again. Rockefeller and Fienstein agreed to grant immunity to w's telecom goons.
Posted by: wordvarc | Oct 19, 2007 10:40:17 AM
Steve, I really don't want to "get over" wondering whether this "average Jack" is under surveillance. In our corporate society where so much is controlled from closed-door boardrooms (like whether my phone company Verizon will make my email records available to NSA at my expense) and knowing that NSA has the technology to search out any "key words", and when bloggers accuse others of "wartime" treason and habeas corpus has been denied to some, I'm worried.
Posted by: Mike Maus | Oct 22, 2007 11:09:25 AM
Post a comment
